Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / March 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Canon, EF lenses and Canon digital SLR

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
matt - 10 Mar 2006 20:19 GMT
I'm currently considering buying a Canon EOS 350D (Digital Rebel XT in
the States) and am puzzled re lenses.

Firstly, will the following EF lenses be compatible with the 350D -

EF 35-80mm f/4-5.6 III
EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III

Also, re the 1.6 cropping issue when using an EF lens on a digital SLR
- am I correct in saying that when using the EF lens with the 350D I
still see what the lens sees, ie whatever I *see* through the
camera/lens and photograph will be exactly the same as what is
recorded on the digital media? Logic tells me this is the case seeing
as it's SLR, but I want to be certain. :-)

Thanks
Tundris - 10 Mar 2006 20:46 GMT
"matt" <mattgyma@hotmail.com> wrote
> Firstly, will the following EF lenses be compatible with the 350D -
>
> EF 35-80mm f/4-5.6 III
> EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III
yes, but I suggest you take a look to EF 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS
check reviews at www.fredmiranda.com
Charles Schuler - 10 Mar 2006 20:51 GMT
> I'm currently considering buying a Canon EOS 350D (Digital Rebel XT in
> the States) and am puzzled re lenses.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> recorded on the digital media? Logic tells me this is the case seeing
> as it's SLR, but I want to be certain. :-)

EF lenses work fine but the 1.6 factor will work against you a bit for wide
angle work and help a bit for telephoto.  It's an SLR and what you see its
what you will get.
matt - 10 Mar 2006 22:30 GMT
>EF lenses work fine but the 1.6 factor will work against you a bit for wide
>angle work and help a bit for telephoto.  It's an SLR and what you see its
>what you will get.

Thanks just wanted to be certain that I wasn't missing anything (eg I
hadn't realised about the 1.6 factor until today as it's not
highlighted in any of the Canon literature or many of the (short)
reviews that I've read).
Charles Schuler - 10 Mar 2006 22:54 GMT
> Thanks just wanted to be certain that I wasn't missing anything (eg I
> hadn't realised about the 1.6 factor until today as it's not
> highlighted in any of the Canon literature or many of the (short)
> reviews that I've read).

The 350D is a nice camera and you can hang all those luscious Canon lenses
on it.  Before you buy, have you checked out the new 30D?
C J Southern - 11 Mar 2006 00:04 GMT
> > Thanks just wanted to be certain that I wasn't missing anything (eg I
> > hadn't realised about the 1.6 factor until today as it's not
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> The 350D is a nice camera and you can hang all those luscious Canon lenses
> on it.  Before you buy, have you checked out the new 30D?

Agreed, although past about 150mm you start hanging the camera off the lens!

30D is a far more robust camera - and it's shutter is rated at TWICE that of
the 350D - definately get it if you can stretch the budget.

How do I know this? Well, I used to have the 350 - but I sold it to buy the
20D, and have never regretted it for a moment!
matt - 11 Mar 2006 10:09 GMT
>> Thanks just wanted to be certain that I wasn't missing anything (eg I
>> hadn't realised about the 1.6 factor until today as it's not
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>The 350D is a nice camera and you can hang all those luscious Canon lenses
>on it.  Before you buy, have you checked out the new 30D?

Somewhat out of my price range I'm sorry to say - I read that it's
about £1000 ?
LabRat - 11 Mar 2006 14:48 GMT
Once the 30D starts shipping, you will probably be able to pick up a 20D for
a decent price.  To me the 20D has a much more solid feel to it than the
350D.

LabRat

>>> Thanks just wanted to be certain that I wasn't missing anything (eg I
>>> hadn't realised about the 1.6 factor until today as it's not
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Somewhat out of my price range I'm sorry to say - I read that it's
> about £1000 ?
Paul J Gans - 11 Mar 2006 03:36 GMT
>I'm currently considering buying a Canon EOS 350D (Digital Rebel XT in
>the States) and am puzzled re lenses.

>Firstly, will the following EF lenses be compatible with the 350D -

>EF 35-80mm f/4-5.6 III
>EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III

All EF lenses will fit the 350D.  So will all EF-S lenses, though
*they* cannot be used on 35mm film or full frame digital Canon
cameras.

>Also, re the 1.6 cropping issue when using an EF lens on a digital SLR
>- am I correct in saying that when using the EF lens with the 350D I
>still see what the lens sees, ie whatever I *see* through the
>camera/lens and photograph will be exactly the same as what is
>recorded on the digital media? Logic tells me this is the case seeing
>as it's SLR, but I want to be certain. :-)

Yes.  What you see is what you get, except for the minor point
that what you see in the viewfinder looking out through the lens
is only about 95% of the image.  This was also the case with many
film cameras.

   ----- Paul J. Gans
GF3 - 12 Mar 2006 02:57 GMT
> I'm currently considering buying a Canon EOS 350D (Digital Rebel XT in
> the States) and am puzzled re lenses.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> EF 35-80mm f/4-5.6 III
> EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III

I suggest that you forget about those turds and buy a good prime or two.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.