Extension Tubes or Macro Lens?

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Edward Holt - 02 Mar 2006 15:58 GMT

What's the advantage of a macro lens over a normal lens plus extension
tubes?

Reply to this Message

Paul Furman - 02 Mar 2006 16:07 GMT

> What's the advantage of a macro lens over a normal lens plus extension
> tubes?

You can't focus to infinity with an extension tube so a macro is handy
in the field.

Macro lenses have flat field for technical work.

Macros are optimized for closeup with regards to all the inherent
compromises in lens design like abberations & such (complex stuff <g>).

Reply to this Message

Hils - 03 Mar 2006 21:26 GMT

>> What's the advantage of a macro lens over a normal lens plus
>>extension tubes?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>Macros are optimized for closeup with regards to all the inherent
>compromises in lens design like abberations & such (complex stuff <g>).

IMX the major practical downside to tubes vis-a-vis a macro lens was
having to change tubes in the field to cover the same magnification
range as a macro lens. It's quite possible to get more than adequate
results using tubes with a good lens.

Signature

Hil

Reply to this Message

Tony Polson - 02 Mar 2006 16:17 GMT

>What's the advantage of a macro lens over a normal lens plus extension
>tubes?

In general, the optics of a macro lens is optimised for close-op work.
The optics of a normal lens are optimised at infinity.

Having said that, it is possible to get good results with some normal
lenses used with extension tubes. It depends on the lens.

Reply to this Message