> Hi all
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> pricey for me, particularly since it seems my old lenses wouldn't work
> with it. My budget is probably about £550-ish.
Not enough, in my opinion.
> Can I realistically get anything that I'd be happy with? What should I
> be looking at?
> Or should I forget the whole thing and look at a better scanner?
Probably you should go for the scanner.
If you want a decent (semi-pro) DSLR, something like the Canon 20D/30D or
Nikon D200 might work but your budget is a bit too tight.
Mike Rooney - 28 Feb 2006 06:26 GMT
>> Hi all
>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> If you want a decent (semi-pro) DSLR, something like the Canon 20D/30D or
> Nikon D200 might work but your budget is a bit too tight.
I agree with Mr. Shuler -- went digital (Canon 20D) about a year and half
ago and it works fine BUT the Nikon 4000 Coolscan purchased about 3 years
ago has done a wonderful job with the thousands of 35mm Velvia and Kodak
E100VS slides I've put through it. The replacement model for the 4000 is
the 5000 and has a few more bells and whistles but I haven't felt the need
to upgrade since the 4000 does such a great job. Both are true film
scanners which is key.
Bill Marshall - 01 Mar 2006 23:48 GMT
Hi Charles and Mike
>> Not enough, in my opinion.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>to upgrade since the 4000 does such a great job. Both are true film
>scanners which is key.
Thank you both for your comments - very useful to have that
perspective. I'll certainly look into the current range of scanners
and compare them to my old Dual Scan II.
thanks again
Bill Marshall
billmarsh@bigfoot.com