Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / March 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

can I get anything that'll replace my Contax 159

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bill Marshall - 27 Feb 2006 22:13 GMT
Hi all

I've been a long time landscape photographer and have used Yashica and
then Contax SLRs since 1984. I love my old Contax 159 - it's light,
falls perfectly into my hand, and with various Yashica lenses and the
wonderful Contax Zeiss 28mm it takes some great photos. However I
increasingly take photos for digital reproduction and the Minolta Dual
Scan II that I've had a for a few years doesn't give me the clarity
and colour balance that I see in my slides (Fuji Sensia and Velvia)
and is slow.

While I've played with a little compact digital for a couple of years
(Kyocera S3L - great for a compact but poor battery performance) I'm
wondering it it's time to move to a digital SLR. However Contax don't
seem to do one anymore and even the last one they did (N) is way too
pricey for me, particularly since it seems my old lenses wouldn't work
with it. My budget is probably about £550-ish.

Can I realistically get anything that I'd be happy with? What should I
be looking at?
Or should I forget the whole thing and look at a better scanner?

Any suggestions or experiences much appreciated.

Bill Marshall
billmarsh@bigfoot.com
Charles Schuler - 27 Feb 2006 22:26 GMT
> Hi all
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> pricey for me, particularly since it seems my old lenses wouldn't work
> with it. My budget is probably about £550-ish.

Not enough, in my opinion.

> Can I realistically get anything that I'd be happy with? What should I
> be looking at?
> Or should I forget the whole thing and look at a better scanner?

Probably you should go for the scanner.

If you want a decent (semi-pro) DSLR, something like the Canon 20D/30D or
Nikon D200 might work but your budget is a bit too tight.
Mike Rooney - 28 Feb 2006 06:26 GMT
>> Hi all
>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> If you want a decent (semi-pro) DSLR, something like the Canon 20D/30D or
> Nikon D200 might work but your budget is a bit too tight.
I agree with Mr. Shuler -- went digital (Canon 20D) about a year and half
ago and it works fine BUT the Nikon 4000 Coolscan purchased about 3 years
ago has done a wonderful job with the thousands of 35mm Velvia and Kodak
E100VS slides I've put through it.  The replacement model for the 4000 is
the 5000 and has a few more bells and whistles but I haven't felt the need
to upgrade since the 4000 does such a great job.  Both are true film
scanners which is key.
Bill Marshall - 01 Mar 2006 23:48 GMT
Hi Charles and Mike

>> Not enough, in my opinion.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>to upgrade since the 4000 does such a great job.  Both are true film
>scanners which is key.

Thank you both for your comments - very useful to have that
perspective. I'll certainly look into the current range of scanners
and compare them to my old Dual Scan II.

thanks again

Bill Marshall
billmarsh@bigfoot.com
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.