You can get frostbite on important body parts doing that...  ;^)

Snow scenes often mean the dynamic range is greater than can be
satisfactorily recorded.  By boosting EC until there are just
less than "excessive" blown highlights, one maximizes the dynamic
range that is recorded.

Hence the above one liner is precisely correct for the question
asked.  A more generalize discussion of exposing for snow scenes
might put it in better perspective though.

Maximum dynamic range may or may not be suitable for all
situations.  If the shadows have important details (for example
when taking a group picture of people standing in direct
sunlight), it might be reasonable to allow what would otherwise
be "excessive" blown highlights.  In that case the EC should be
high enough to see a lot of blinking areas in the snow (but not
on the people), or maybe 1/2 to 1 stop higher than "just less
than excessive".

As opposed to that, if the intent is to photograph the texture
of the snow itself, backing off 1/2 to 1 stop from the point
where the snow is blowing out will provide better detail in the
highlights.

It's a judgment call, and also depends on whether it is under
direct sunlight or if it's a cloudy day.

While it is true that post processing does not occur in raw, the chosen
settings (i.e. white balance, color settings incuding levels and color
space, etc) are stored in the raw file.  Most viewers will apply these
settings when the raw file is displayed.  Somethings that DO effect the
final image are exposure compensation and obviously the mechanical
settings that effect the picture itself.