>> I was looking to purchase the 'Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.8 II Autofocus
>> Lens' at bhphotovideo.com as my first nice (non-kit) lens. They show
>> an imported and a USA version of what apears to be the same lens. Can
>> someone tell me what the difference is, other than the five dollar
>> price tag, and which would have better optics?
>You can't get US warranty repairs with the import.
I bought a grey-market 100-400LIS from B&H, and later brought it back
for repairs, and when it came back a few weeks later, it had paperwork
from Canon Service Dept.

Signature
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
John P Sheehy <JPS@no.komm>
><<> <>>< <>>< ><<> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>><
Pete D - 02 Feb 2006 02:31 GMT
>>> I was looking to purchase the 'Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.8 II Autofocus
>>> Lens' at bhphotovideo.com as my first nice (non-kit) lens. They show
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> for repairs, and when it came back a few weeks later, it had paperwork
> from Canon Service Dept.
Probably means B&H sent it to Canon and paid for the repair rather than for
free under warrantee.
JPS@no.komm - 02 Feb 2006 03:13 GMT
>> I bought a grey-market 100-400LIS from B&H, and later brought it back
>> for repairs, and when it came back a few weeks later, it had paperwork
>> from Canon Service Dept.
>Probably means B&H sent it to Canon and paid for the repair rather than for
>free under warrantee.
Probably with a large-customer discount, as well.
Works better for me, as I'd rather bring the item to B&H than to pay to
ship it somewhere. I hate shipping things, and I hate receiving
packages.

Signature
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
John P Sheehy <JPS@no.komm>
><<> <>>< <>>< ><<> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>><
ronviers@gmail.com - 02 Feb 2006 03:01 GMT
So I take it you are saying you think it was a good place to save ten
dollars?
Thanks,
Ron
> >> I was looking to purchase the 'Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.8 II Autofocus
> >> Lens' at bhphotovideo.com as my first nice (non-kit) lens. They show
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> John P Sheehy <JPS@no.komm>
> ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>><
JPS@no.komm - 02 Feb 2006 03:24 GMT
>So I take it you are saying you think it was a good place to save ten
>dollars?
I saved over $100, not $10. For $10, I would do whatever is most
convenient for me. If you'd rather send or bring it to Canon yourself,
then spend the extra $10.

Signature
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
John P Sheehy <JPS@no.komm>
><<> <>>< <>>< ><<> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>><