> Hey Guys,
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> - Siddhartha
I like this one: http://gallery133884.fotopic.net/p11194754.html
But I would definitely increase the contrast or go the other way for a
more foggy appearance. If you have Photoshop CS, use the
shadow/highlight tool and see what kind of results you get.
Siddhartha Jain - 29 Jan 2005 12:53 GMT
> I like this one: http://gallery133884.fotopic.net/p11194754.html
Funny. Everyone who looked at that picture liked it except me. I didn't
find it extraordinary at all. Instead, I was struck by this one as soon
as I saw it:
http://gallery133884.fotopic.net/p11101712.html
Thanks for the feedback anyways.
- Siddhartha
> Hey Guys,
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> - Siddhartha
Well, I found your pictures very interesting from a scenic/cultural
point of view, Siddartha, and I think the presentation quality is good.
Personally I don't agree with comments about "I would do this or that
with this image" etc., camera club style. I try to accept the images as
the author presented them, and yours are to me eminently acceptable. I
have some some questions, though. What mode were they shot in? They
appear to me to be RAW shots, judging by the controlled highlights,
retaining detail even inside the lamp reflectors in the image with the
person at a desk and surrounded by paintings, but I could be wrong about
that. Was the exposure as per the meter each time?
For the scenic side, there appears to be heavy cloud, or perhaps
pollution in the atmosphere in most of the outdoor shots, giving quite a
moody feel to the images. Was it so, and is it normal in those parts?
I have spent some time in Hong Kong over recent years, and atmospheric
haze/smog reduces visibility there to about a kilometre or less at
times, unlike New Zealand, where sometimes you can see for literally
hundreds of kilometres, and almost always tens of k's.
Thanks for putting up those images,
Colin
Siddhartha Jain - 29 Jan 2005 13:04 GMT
> I have some some questions, though. What mode were they shot in?
They
> appear to me to be RAW shots, judging by the controlled highlights,
> retaining detail even inside the lamp reflectors in the image with the
> person at a desk and surrounded by paintings, but I could be wrong about
> that. Was the exposure as per the meter each time?
Surprise surprise :) They were shot in JPEG Super Fine mode. But I
guess the credit for that goes to Canon and not me. Nope, the exposure
wasn't what the camera recommended each time. It was tweaked to my gut
feel mostly. But in this particular photograph, yes, it was manually
set so that EV is '0' in the meter. I used the minimum possible
aperture to give myself maximum shutter speed to prevent blurring.
> For the scenic side, there appears to be heavy cloud, or perhaps
> pollution in the atmosphere in most of the outdoor shots, giving quite a
> moody feel to the images. Was it so, and is it normal in those parts?
Yes, there was a bit of haze all around especially in the morning
shots. The 18-55mm I used has a B+W Skylight 1A filter while the
Jupiter 200mm doesn't have any filters.
> Thanks for putting up those images,
Thanks for reviewing them :)
- Siddhartha