>I've got old negatives I'd like to 'scan' using my D70, so I can
>
>What kit would be best for this?
How about a slide copier?
http://www.digitalsecrets.net/secrets/D70Accessories.html
4th from the bottom.

Signature
Chris Pollard
CG Internet café, Tagum City, Philippines
http://www.cginternet.net
Ken Tough - 23 Jan 2005 11:07 GMT
>>I've got old negatives I'd like to 'scan' using my D70, so I can
>>What kit would be best for this?
>How about a slide copier?
>http://www.digitalsecrets.net/secrets/D70Accessories.html
Looks good, though from what I gather that's just a holder
to fit onto a 60mm micro Nikkor. It's possible, but I don't
have the micro-nikkor yet...
Thanks for the pointer.

Signature
Ken Tough
Sheldon - 23 Jan 2005 18:14 GMT
>>>I've got old negatives I'd like to 'scan' using my D70, so I can
>>>What kit would be best for this?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Thanks for the pointer.
I have this slide copier. It's made to fit the 52mm threads on older Nikon
lenses. I've used it with my older Sony P&S digital camera in macro mode by
using a step-up ring from B&H Photo. Currently my Nikon Macro lens is being
converted to use with my D70 so I don't know how well it will work, and I
need to get a step-down ring to see if it works with the lens that comes
with the D70.
paul - 23 Jan 2005 18:25 GMT
>>>I've got old negatives I'd like to 'scan' using my D70, so I can
>>>What kit would be best for this?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> to fit onto a 60mm micro Nikkor. It's possible, but I don't
> have the micro-nikkor yet...
I think it should be the easiest way for web but probably not really
good enough to print except little snapshots (which might be all you
need). Serious scanning is slow and expensive. Here's an adapter that
works on various lenses for $65:
http://www.panwebi.com/default.asp?sp=1177172
When copying with an SLR camera, use an 80mm ~120mm zoom lens and set
the diaphragm at F11 or smaller for sharper pictures.
CLOSE-UP PHOTOGRAPHY:
The lens of the Digital Duplicator may be used as a +10 close-up lens.
Remove the lens unit from the Digital Duplicator and attach it onto the
camera lens for close-up picture taking.
Ken Tough - 24 Jan 2005 08:06 GMT
>I think it should be the easiest way for web but probably not really
>good enough to print except little snapshots (which might be all you
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>When copying with an SLR camera, use an 80mm ~120mm zoom lens and set
>the diaphragm at F11 or smaller for sharper pictures.
What are the focus requirements? Does this adapter have an
internal lens, and if so, can I use standard lenses with it
or do they have to be a macro/close-focus? (Especially
considering the note you have below...)
>CLOSE-UP PHOTOGRAPHY:
>The lens of the Digital Duplicator may be used as a +10 close-up lens.
>Remove the lens unit from the Digital Duplicator and attach it onto the
>camera lens for close-up picture taking.

Signature
Ken Tough
paul - 24 Jan 2005 15:19 GMT
>>Here's an adapter that
>>works on various lenses for $65:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> internal lens, and if so, can I use standard lenses with it
> or do they have to be a macro/close-focus?
Looks like it includes a cheap diopter lens and can work on a range of
normal lenses.
> I've got old negatives I'd like to 'scan' using my D70, so I can
> put them on webpages, share easily, manipulate & get printed, and
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> get access to them (+1/+2/+3) but not sure what lens they were
> for originally.
Problem with color negatives is that they have an orange mask such that
when you invert, the image will be mainly blue. I'm not sure if there
is an easy way to convert it to 'natural' easilly.
A 'true' macro will be flat field enough to not distort the images
noticeably. Using closeup lens attachments will reduce the quality of
the image in several ways including distortion and corner softness.
If it's just for web pages, then a cheap film scanner can be had for
$200 or probably less. A good machine would the old Dimage Scan Dual
which you can probaly get on ebay for $100 or less. (SCSI, but the
interface comes with the machine, make sure it is included when you buy).
Cheers,
Alan.

Signature
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.
Ken Tough - 24 Jan 2005 08:04 GMT
>Problem with color negatives is that they have an orange mask such that
>when you invert, the image will be mainly blue. I'm not sure if there
>is an easy way to convert it to 'natural' easilly.
Wouldn't I be able to handle this properly if I shoot in raw/NEF
mode and use a good offline editor to manipulate the colour
channels?
Thanks for the info.

Signature
Ken Tough
Alan Browne - 24 Jan 2005 15:23 GMT
>>Problem with color negatives is that they have an orange mask such that
>>when you invert, the image will be mainly blue. I'm not sure if there
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> mode and use a good offline editor to manipulate the colour
> channels?
Likely. I personally don't know how (as I said above).
Cheers,
Alan

Signature
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.