Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Digital Camera Reviews

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
world_news.8091732510385@blogger.com - 18 Dec 2005 22:21 GMT
http://digital.camera-reviews.net/Site-Map.html - Not your typical
Digital camera review site.
Alan Browne - 18 Dec 2005 22:48 GMT
> http://digital.camera-reviews.net/Site-Map.html - Not your typical
> Digital camera review site.

Indeed, beginning with poor grammar and then getting really bad, this
site is a big stinker.
SMS - 19 Dec 2005 00:10 GMT
>> http://digital.camera-reviews.net/Site-Map.html - Not your typical
>> Digital camera review site.
>
> Indeed, beginning with poor grammar and then getting really bad, this
> site is a big stinker.

The reviews look like they were done in another language, then
translated using one of those automatic translation programs.

The grammar is bad enough, but there are a great many actual errors in
fact as well.

It looks like the main goal of the site is to try and get referral fees.
m II - 19 Dec 2005 02:46 GMT
> The reviews look like they were done in another language, then
> translated using one of those automatic translation programs.

goes just to show what know you is little! I it liked much very.

mike (the pen of my aunt wags the tail of my dog) II
G.T. - 19 Dec 2005 02:52 GMT
>> The reviews look like they were done in another language, then
>> translated using one of those automatic translation programs.
>
> goes just to show what know you is little! I it liked much very.

What a f.cking nightmare of a site.

> mike (the pen of my aunt wags the tail of my dog) II

Are you astro-turding for them?

Greg
Signature

"Destroy your safe and happy lives before it is too late
The battles we fought were long and hard
Just not to be consumed by rock and roll" - The Mekons

m II - 19 Dec 2005 03:07 GMT
>> goes just to show what know you is little! I it liked much very.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Greg

Babelfish in bad light me casts?

mike (Eu era justo tendo o divertimento)

http://babelfish.altavista.com/tr
Tony Polson - 19 Dec 2005 23:17 GMT
>>> http://digital.camera-reviews.net/Site-Map.html - Not your typical
>>> Digital camera review site.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>It looks like the main goal of the site is to try and get referral fees.

Just like your failed attempt, then.  
Jeremy Nixon - 18 Dec 2005 22:56 GMT
> Not your typical Digital camera review site.

Definitely not -- this one is atypically terrible.

Signature

Jeremy  |  jeremy@exit109.com

Nigel Cummings - 19 Dec 2005 09:16 GMT
That is a pretty dreadful review site. I certainly would'nt want to base a
purchase solely on the information (or lack of) in any of those reviews.

> http://digital.camera-reviews.net/Site-Map.html - Not your typical
> Digital camera review site.
Pod - 19 Dec 2005 14:53 GMT
> http://digital.camera-reviews.net/Site-Map.html - Not your typical
> Digital camera review site.

To call this a bad site would be an insult to all of the bad sites in the
world.  It transcends bad.
m II - 20 Dec 2005 04:26 GMT
>> http://digital.camera-reviews.net/Site-Map.html - Not your typical
>> Digital camera review site.
>
> To call this a bad site would be an insult to all of the bad sites in the
> world.  It transcends bad.

You question compositional gems such as these? Have you no small portion
of a poet's soul?

==================================
The Panasonic FZ20 in particular is a 12x optical zoom digital camera
and carries a price tag of around $599 US retail which is of good value
for the feature set and image quality that being 5 MP at a total image
size of 2560 x 1920 resolution.
==================================

We aren't about to rate each camera ourselves, we thought that might be
bias so we are asking for your opinion so we can comprise a truley
unbiased way of calculating a Digital Camera Ratings System.
==================================

How many types of digital cameras are their?  Basically speaking their
is two types of digital cameras on the market, the standard point and
shoot models with built in lenses and zoom functions and Digital SLRs.
==================================

mike II
Frank ess - 20 Dec 2005 05:06 GMT
>>> http://digital.camera-reviews.net/Site-Map.html - Not your typical
>>> Digital camera review site.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> You question compositional gems such as these? Have you no small
> portion of a poet's soul?

If a poet makes poems, who or what makes doggerel?

==================================
> The Panasonic FZ20 in particular is a 12x optical zoom digital
> camera
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> mike II
m II - 20 Dec 2005 05:20 GMT
>> You question compositional gems such as these? Have you no small
>> portion of a poet's soul?
>
> If a poet makes poems, who or what makes doggerel?

word mongrellers?

..woof..

mikey mangler II
Frank ess - 20 Dec 2005 05:48 GMT
>>> You question compositional gems such as these? Have you no small
>>> portion of a poet's soul?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> mikey mangler II

m2?

Conjures up a picture...

Bad Cog

Jen Piccolo

If only I could remember.

Signature

Frank ess
"The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
Moves on: nor all your Piety nor Wit
Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
Nor all your Tears wash out a Word of it."

the rubaiyat - omar khayyam - 11th century

G.T. - 20 Dec 2005 06:24 GMT
>>> http://digital.camera-reviews.net/Site-Map.html - Not your typical
>>> Digital camera review site.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> You question compositional gems such as these? Have you no small portion
> of a poet's soul?

> ==================================
>
> We aren't about to rate each camera ourselves, we thought that might be
> bias so we are asking for your opinion so we can comprise a truley
> unbiased way of calculating a Digital Camera Ratings System.
> ==================================

So you are an astro-turder.

Greg

Signature

"Destroy your safe and happy lives before it is too late
The battles we fought were long and hard
Just not to be consumed by rock and roll" - The Mekons

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.