>> "Ed Ruf (REPLY to E-MAIL IN SIG!)" <egruf_usenet2@cox.net> wrote in
>> message news:b9vaq1ptm0m9oulrnaflmpvidd883q3sce@4ax.com...
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Getting a USB 2.0 hi-speed reader (and setting up your PC for hi-speed) is
> good advice.
Yeah, I found that the transfer from camera to computer(s) was almost
painfully slow (especially when offloading a few hundred raw images from the
microdrive) and I bought a card reader. Cut the transfer time about by
about 2/3 but still not what I'd expect for a really high-speed connection.
These comments apply to both microdrive and CF card and I'd have to conclude
that neither a microdrive nor a CF card would actually support the maximum
transfer rate of USB High Speed.
But regardless, the D70's built-in USB interface is 2.0, not 1.x
Norm
Jeremy Nixon - 20 Dec 2005 23:46 GMT
> But regardless, the D70's built-in USB interface is 2.0, not 1.x
"USB 2.0 Full Speed" is USB 1.1 renamed for marketing purposes.

Signature
Jeremy | jeremy@exit109.com
Ed Ruf (REPLY to E-MAIL IN SIG!) - 21 Dec 2005 00:31 GMT
>Yeah, I found that the transfer from camera to computer(s) was almost
>painfully slow (especially when offloading a few hundred raw images from the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>that neither a microdrive nor a CF card would actually support the maximum
>transfer rate of USB High Speed.
What CF card? The card can limit speed as well.
>But regardless, the D70's built-in USB interface is 2.0, not 1.x
Just semantics, fwiw at this point.

Signature
Ed Ruf Lifetime AMA# 344007 (Usenet2@EdwardG.Ruf.com)
See images taken with my CP-990/5700 & D70 at
http://edwardgruf.com/Digital_Photography/General/index.html
SMS - 21 Dec 2005 05:33 GMT
> But regardless, the D70's built-in USB interface is 2.0, not 1.x
They are running USB 1.1 speeds over a USB 2.0 interface. For all
intents and purposes, it's USB 1.1. It's marketing semantics by Nikon,
intended to mislead customers.
G.T. - 21 Dec 2005 07:14 GMT
>> But regardless, the D70's built-in USB interface is 2.0, not 1.x
>
> They are running USB 1.1 speeds over a USB 2.0 interface. For all
> intents and purposes, it's USB 1.1. It's marketing semantics by Nikon,
> intended to mislead customers.
Well, Nikon is just capitalizing on this, this is a USB marketing issue
and many manufacturers do use this deceptive marketing practice.
Greg

Signature
"Destroy your safe and happy lives before it is too late
The battles we fought were long and hard
Just not to be consumed by rock and roll" - The Mekons
David J Taylor - 21 Dec 2005 08:30 GMT
[]
> Yeah, I found that the transfer from camera to computer(s) was almost
> painfully slow (especially when offloading a few hundred raw images
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Norm
In brief tests I made, I managed to get 2.5MB/s (20Mb/s) when I got my
computer set up for USB 2.0 hi-speed. This was disappointingly slow
(although twice as fast as the USB "full speed" I had enjoyed before).
More recent tests are better: SanDisk Ultra II SD - 294MB in 51s =>
5.76MB/s. SanDisk Ultra II CF - 521MB in 94s => 5.54MB/s.
The maximum theoretical speed of USB 2.0 is 480Mb/s or 60MB/s, so somewhat
outside current memory card range.
David