Have you got all day? :-)

Nah, look, digital has its place in photography and the market is all
for it. My main gripes with it are that it requires a regimented
approach to workflow and archiving that is very labour intensive. In
other words, if you don't mind spending a lot of time in front of the
PC/Mac sorting through your images you will enjoy it.

Personally I prefer to drop off a roll of film for processing and look
at it on a light table later on. If there is a shot that I really like I
will spend the time scanning in and working with it in PS before having
a print made.

With digital you tend to shoot a lot and the more you shoot, the more
work you give yourself to do. With film I find that because of the
financial overhead I am a lot more careful with what I shoot. I take the
time to think about what I am doing and then I take the shot. Invariably
this approach delivers better results (for me anyway).