I want to start by thanking all those that post on my original question -
6.3m.p. 10D or 8.0 350D. I decided to go with the NEW 8.0 with a $75 rebate
and warranty. I really do like it's size/weight compared to the 10D. I'm a
digital SLR newbie and need some guidance.
NEXT QUESTION - Lenses.
The camera comes with the 18-55mm lens. I have a 28-85mm 1:4 Canon FD lens
for my A1. I'd be happy with that quality and range for the digital camera.
Any suggestions? My daughter has an EOS Elan 7 with a 28-105 f:3.5-4.5 EF
Ultrasonic lens, Is this compatible? If so I'll spent the dollars on
something in the 300 mm range.
Thanks again
Eugene Wendland
Måns Rullgård - 10 Dec 2005 21:19 GMT
> I want to start by thanking all those that post on my original question -
> 6.3m.p. 10D or 8.0 350D. I decided to go with the NEW 8.0 with a $75 rebate
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> The camera comes with the 18-55mm lens. I have a 28-85mm 1:4 Canon FD lens
> for my A1. I'd be happy with that quality and range for the digital camera.
I've heard of adapters for such things. Wait for someone else to
provide specifics.
> Any suggestions? My daughter has an EOS Elan 7 with a 28-105
> f:3.5-4.5 EF Ultrasonic lens, Is this compatible?
Any EF lens will work.
> If so I'll spent the dollars on something in the 300 mm range.
Some good value for money can be found with the 70-200mm f/4L. It's
not 300mm, but it's L.

Signature
Måns Rullgård
mru@inprovide.com
Bill - 11 Dec 2005 01:44 GMT
>The camera comes with the 18-55mm lens. I have a 28-85mm 1:4 Canon FD lens
>for my A1. I'd be happy with that quality and range for the digital camera.
>Any suggestions? My daughter has an EOS Elan 7 with a 28-105 f:3.5-4.5 EF
>Ultrasonic lens, Is this compatible?
Yes, the 28-105 will work just fine on the XT.
Just remember the FOV conversion factor which is 1.6x resulting in a
field of view that resembles a 45-168mm lense. You'll probably need the
18-55 kit lense for the wider angles.
> If so I'll spent the dollars on
>something in the 300 mm range.
In the same level of optical quality, you might want to look at the
newer 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS lense.
If you want really good optics, for about the same money you can get the
fantastic 70-200 f/4 L lense.
jean - 11 Dec 2005 05:09 GMT
> >The camera comes with the 18-55mm lens. I have a 28-85mm 1:4 Canon FD lens
> >for my A1. I'd be happy with that quality and range for the digital camera.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> In the same level of optical quality, you might want to look at the
> newer 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS lense.
> If you want really good optics, for about the same money you can get the
> fantastic 70-200 f/4 L lense.
Then next Christmas or for your birthday, ask for a 1.4X teleconverter ;-)
The Canon 300mm f4 L is also a very good lens.
Jean
Stephen M. Dunn - 11 Dec 2005 18:03 GMT
$The camera comes with the 18-55mm lens. I have a 28-85mm 1:4 Canon FD lens
$for my A1. I'd be happy with that quality and range for the digital camera.
$Any suggestions?
I have no idea what the quality of that FD lens is, but the 18-55
gives you the same range. Keep in mind the 1.6 cropping factor of the
350D; the 18-55 gives roughly the same coverage as a 28-90 gives on a
film body. The 18-55 is a kit lens, and kit lenses aren't known for
stellar optics, but it's supposedly better than most kit lenses.
My suggestion would be to use the 18-55 for a while and see if it
meets your needs. If you find its optics disappointing, or need
something faster, or wider, or longer, or with faster autofocus,
then you'll know where to focus your search for a new lens. If,
on the other hand, the 18-55 does what you need, you can put the
money into something which would be more useful to you.
$ My daughter has an EOS Elan 7 with a 28-105 f:3.5-4.5 EF
$Ultrasonic lens, Is this compatible?
Yes, and it's one of Canon's better consumer-grade zoom lenses,
both optically and mechanically. Again, keep in mind the cropping
factor; this acts like roughly a 45-170. Unless you don't like
wide-angle views at all, this is not suitable as an only lens on
a 350D.
All Canon EF lenses are compatible with all EOS bodies, film or
digital. Third-party EF lenses are physically compatible; some have
had some software compatibility issues. The lenses you have to watch
out for are EF-S lenses, and third-party lenses which claim to work
only on APS-sized digital bodies. All of these will be fine on the
350D, but will not work on bodies with larger sensors (such as film
bodies, or some of the higher-end digital bodies). If you want
lenses which will work on your 350D as well as on your
daughter's Elan (or on a higher-end digital body if you choose to
upgrade at some point), then you'll want to avoid these digital-only
lenses; if, on the other hand, your only concern is whether they'll
work on your 350D, then feel free to include digital-only lenses
in your search.
The 18-55 kit lens, for instance, is an EF-S lens. Your daughter
can't use it on her Elan; it won't physically fit. But it will be
fine on the 350D.
$ If so I'll spent the dollars on
$something in the 300 mm range.
Again, keep in mind the cropping factor; if you're thinking about
300mm in 35mm terms, you need a 200mm (approximately) lens on the 350D.
Are you looking for a zoom to go from where the 18-55 or 28-105 leaves
off to get you to 200/300, or for a 200/300 prime? And what's your
budget for this?

Signature
Stephen M. Dunn <stephen@stevedunn.ca>
>>>----------------> http://www.stevedunn.ca/ <----------------<<<
------------------------------------------------------------------
Say hi to my cat -- http://www.stevedunn.ca/photos/toby/
Eugene Wendland - 11 Dec 2005 19:53 GMT
> Are you looking for a zoom to go from where the 18-55 or 28-105 leaves
> off to get you to 200/300, or for a 200/300 prime? And what's your
> budget for this?
Budget wise, I was looking at starting with two lenses. I'm thinking of
going with the IS (Image Stabilization) lenses and one would be the
EF-S17-85 and the other would be a EF 70 - 300. Both of these lenses run in
the $600 U.S. range. I like what they have to offer in a consumer grade
lens and in the future, if I feel the need to upgrade, I'll look into the L
series lenses. I think these will be a good place to start, using the
EFS17-85 as my primary lens with the option for some telephoto with the EF
70-300. Any more thoughts are more than welcome especially thoughts on the
consumer grade IS lens series.
Thanks
Eugene Wendland
Anabella M. - 12 Dec 2005 01:01 GMT
In my opinion, it seems to me that you have made a very nice choice of
lenses. The new EF 70-300 IS USM in particular is an extremely nice lens
that should bring you a lot of enjoyment. I own one (on my 20D).
...and merry christmas... :-)
Regards, Anabella M.
> > Are you looking for a zoom to go from where the 18-55 or 28-105 leaves
> > off to get you to 200/300, or for a 200/300 prime? And what's your
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Eugene Wendland
--
Anabella M.
....it's better to have loved and lost
than to have never seen "Lost in Space"!
--Kelly Bundy
Xeke - 12 Dec 2005 02:47 GMT
Any EF lens is compatible so your 28-105 will work. regarding the A1
lens, I would say as long as its a 58mm lens, you could use it. Of
course, you're going to have to go manual focus though.
> I want to start by thanking all those that post on my original question -
> 6.3m.p. 10D or 8.0 350D. I decided to go with the NEW 8.0 with a $75 rebate
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Eugene Wendland

Signature
Xeke
Canon S1 IS & EOS 300d/Digital Rebel
--
Home page http://xekes.com
Photo gallery http://xekes.com/gallery
Flickr http://flickr.com/photos/xekes
Steve Dell - 13 Dec 2005 22:40 GMT
FD lens will probably not work with the auto focus of the Rebel XT.
I've been quite happy with the 17-85 IS lens as a "normal" lens with the XT
(350D)
Steve Dell
>I want to start by thanking all those that post on my original question -
>6.3m.p. 10D or 8.0 350D. I decided to go with the NEW 8.0 with a $75
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Eugene Wendland
bj286@scn.org - 22 Dec 2005 06:19 GMT
> The camera comes with the 18-55mm lens. I have a 28-85mm 1:4 Canon FD lens
> for my A1. I'd be happy with that quality and range for the digital camera.
> Any suggestions?
50/1.4
20/2.8
> I'll spent the dollars on something in the 300 mm range.
200/2.8
http://digitcamera.tripod.com/#slr