Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Photoshop Elements

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bruce - 08 Dec 2005 17:46 GMT
So now I have a D70 I thought I'd buy some decent but affordable software, I
eventually decided on Photoshop Elements 4 fortunatley I downloaded the
trial version first to make sure it would read NEF files only to find that
it won't work on anything other than XP. Bit research & I found that version
3 will work on my Windows 2000 but Adobe don't sell it. How many customers
will that lose them . I ended up buying the Nikon Capture software.

Best Wishes
   Bruce
David J Taylor - 08 Dec 2005 18:42 GMT
> So now I have a D70 I thought I'd buy some decent but affordable
> software, I eventually decided on Photoshop Elements 4 fortunatley I
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Best Wishes
>    Bruce

Presumably, Adobe have done their sums and made a business decision that
any extra income from Windows 2000 customers would not cover the extra
support and testing effort required for the older OS.

David
Grumpy AuContraire - 08 Dec 2005 19:31 GMT
> So now I have a D70 I thought I'd buy some decent but affordable software, I
> eventually decided on Photoshop Elements 4 fortunatley I downloaded the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Best Wishes
>     Bruce

You might be able to find an older version of PhotoShop LE on ebay.  It
should work with all Windoze systems as well as Mac classic (through 9.2).

JT
Peter A. Stavrakoglou - 08 Dec 2005 20:17 GMT
> So now I have a D70 I thought I'd buy some decent but affordable software,
> I
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Best Wishes
>    Bruce

You shouldn't have a problem finding version 3 of Elements being sold, I see
it at computer fairs all the time.  Try online searches, I'll bet you find
it within the first few links.
This old Bob - 08 Dec 2005 22:36 GMT
> So now I have a D70 I thought I'd buy some decent but affordable software,
> I
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> 3 will work on my Windows 2000 but Adobe don't sell it. How many customers
> will that lose them . I ended up buying the Nikon Capture software.

And the problem with Elements 3 is it does not have the latest ACR (RAW).
John Francis - 08 Dec 2005 23:55 GMT
>> So now I have a D70 I thought I'd buy some decent but affordable software,
>> I
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>And the problem with Elements 3 is it does not have the latest ACR (RAW).

That's easy enough to fix - just download 3.2 (or 3.3 beta) from Adobe.
G.T. - 09 Dec 2005 01:43 GMT
> >> So now I have a D70 I thought I'd buy some decent but affordable software,
> >> I
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> That's easy enough to fix - just download 3.2 (or 3.3 beta) from Adobe.

That version doesn't run on Elements 3.  That's his point.

Greg
Eric Schreiber - 09 Dec 2005 02:27 GMT
>> That's easy enough to fix - just download 3.2 (or 3.3 beta) from
>> Adobe.

> That version doesn't run on Elements 3.  That's his point.

I thought the OP said that Elements *4* won't work on 2000, but
Elements 3 will. In fact, I'm sure that's what he said.

Presumably, version 3 patches won't change that.
G.T. - 09 Dec 2005 02:41 GMT
> >> That's easy enough to fix - just download 3.2 (or 3.3 beta) from
> >> Adobe.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I thought the OP said that Elements *4* won't work on 2000, but
> Elements 3 will. In fact, I'm sure that's what he said.

I have said anything related to Elements 4 or Elements 3 running on 2000.
These previous three messages are regarding the Adobe Camera RAW plugins.

> Presumably, version 3 patches won't change that.

You trimmed waaaaay too much.  Elements 3 will run on 2000 but ACR 3.2 (or
3.3 beta) will not work with Elements 3.0.

John Francis said:

"That's easy enough to fix - just download 3.2 (or 3.3 beta) from Adobe."

in response to:  "And the problem with Elements 3 is it does not have the
latest ACR (RAW)."

There are new features, very useful ones, in ACR 3.2 that are not in ACR 2.4
which is the latest that will work with Elements 3.0.

The original poster is not only missing out on the new features of Elements
4.0 but he is also missing out on the new features of ACR 3.2.

Greg
G.T. - 09 Dec 2005 02:48 GMT
> > >> That's easy enough to fix - just download 3.2 (or 3.3 beta) from
> > >> Adobe.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I have said anything related to Elements 4 or Elements 3 running on 2000.
> These previous three messages are regarding the Adobe Camera RAW plugins.

Make that "I haven't said anything".

> > Presumably, version 3 patches won't change that.
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Greg
piperut - 09 Dec 2005 20:56 GMT
> > > >> That's easy enough to fix - just download 3.2 (or 3.3 beta) from
> > > >> Adobe.
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> >
> > Greg

I think somone named Bruce started this thread.
You might try going to http://gimp-win.sourceforge.net/ and taking a
look at Gimp for windows.  It is a GPL program.  The linux version of
GIMP works fairly well.   I have loaded GIMP for Windows in XP with
mixed results.  (In XP it doesn't seem to like my printers, however in
LINUX the printers work fine with it.)  I ended up with a work around
for the dislike of the printers... save the output file and use Picasa
for printing.  However, I am doing most the photo editing in Linux now.

Anyway, you may want to take a look at it.  It might just solve your
problems.  It is a free program.  You just have to follow the correct
order to download it and install it.  If you have a card reader, it
will give you an error when you start it if you don't have any media in
the card reader.

It actually is closer to the full blown Adobe then the Adobe Elements
program.

roland
John Francis - 09 Dec 2005 03:52 GMT
>> >> That's easy enough to fix - just download 3.2 (or 3.3 beta) from
>> >> Adobe.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>You trimmed waaaaay too much.  Elements 3 will run on 2000 but ACR 3.2 (or
>3.3 beta) will not work with Elements 3.0.

Perhaps you should check your facts before rushing to 'correct' people.
Elements 3.0 has no problem using Camera Raw 3.x - I've run it with 3.1
and 3.2, and I know of people using the 3.3 beta without problems

While you can't use ACR 3.x with Photoshop CS - you need CS2 - there
are no such restriction with Elements 3.0

>John Francis said:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>There are new features, very useful ones, in ACR 3.2 that are not in ACR 2.4

True

>which is the latest that will work with Elements 3.0.

False

>The original poster is not only missing out on the new features of Elements
>4.0 but he is also missing out on the new features of ACR 3.2.
>
>Greg
G.T. - 09 Dec 2005 07:21 GMT
>>>>>That's easy enough to fix - just download 3.2 (or 3.3 beta) from
>>>>>Adobe.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> While you can't use ACR 3.x with Photoshop CS - you need CS2 - there
> are no such restriction with Elements 3.0

Me culpa.  I'll have to revisit Elements 3.0, I've been using CS for
awhile now and could have sworn that ACR 3.2 didn't work with 3.0 so
there was no reason for me to use Elements 3.0 any more.

>>John Francis said:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> False

Sorry about the misinformation.  Now that I think about it I probably
confused myself between Elements 2.0 which I have on my PC laptop, and
Elements 3.0 and CS that I have on my Mac desktop.

Greg

Signature

"Destroy your safe and happy lives before it is too late
The battles we fought were long and hard
Just not to be consumed by rock and roll" - The Mekons

Robert Brace - 09 Dec 2005 20:23 GMT
>>> >> That's easy enough to fix - just download 3.2 (or 3.3 beta) from
>>> >> Adobe.
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>>
>>Greg

John:
   I use ACR 3.1 to produce DNG files directly from the NEF files (outside
of PS) then the DNG files can be opened with PS CS.  This allows the use of
3.1 (and presumably 3.2, 3.3, Etc.) without needing PSCS2.
   For example 3.1 supports EXIF "user comments", where 2.4 didn't.
   What am I missing here (other than not upgrading from PSCS to PSCS2)??
Bob
G.T. - 09 Dec 2005 21:42 GMT
> John:
>     I use ACR 3.1 to produce DNG files directly from the NEF files (outside
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>     What am I missing here (other than not upgrading from PSCS to PSCS2)??
> Bob

Don't you mean you're converting NEF files to DNG using the DNG
converter and then opening them with the ACR 2.4 plugin for PS CS?  If
not, then I'm a little confused (as usual).  IIRC ACR is not a
standalone program but the DNG converter is.  And the ACR 3.2 plugin has
more control than the 2.4 series plugin.

I'm a little hesitant to post this as I have neither my Mac or PC booted
to double-check and clearly that has led me to posting misinformation
before.

Greg

Signature

"Destroy your safe and happy lives before it is too late
The battles we fought were long and hard
Just not to be consumed by rock and roll" - The Mekons

Robert Brace - 09 Dec 2005 23:38 GMT
>> John:
>>     I use ACR 3.1 to produce DNG files directly from the NEF files
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Greg

Greg:
   That's correct the 3.1 converter is a standalone program released with
ACR 3.1 and it has better "support" of the EXIF info in the NEF files than
did either ACR 2.4 or the 2.4 converter.
   Once the NEF files are changed to DNG files, those files can be opened
in PS CS (with the 2.4 ACR plug-in installed of course) and the information
which was unavailable if the NEF files were opened directly in PS CS with
ACR 2.4 now becomes visible because of the conversion to DNG by the 3.1
converter.
   I guess you are correct when you say the ACR 2.4 plug-in is opening
them.  I just never thought of it that way.  I look upon it more of a way to
keep up with the necessity of changing to accommodate new camera NEF files
without having to upgrade to PS CS2.  Simply download the updated DNG
converter to handle the new camera NEF files and you are in business.
   Are you aware of anything I am missing here??
Bob
G.T. - 10 Dec 2005 01:09 GMT
> Greg:
>     That's correct the 3.1 converter is a standalone program released with
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> ACR 2.4 now becomes visible because of the conversion to DNG by the 3.1
> converter.

For once going from memory didn't fail me.

>     I guess you are correct when you say the ACR 2.4 plug-in is opening
> them.  I just never thought of it that way.  I look upon it more of a way to
> keep up with the necessity of changing to accommodate new camera NEF files
> without having to upgrade to PS CS2.  Simply download the updated DNG
> converter to handle the new camera NEF files and you are in business.
>     Are you aware of anything I am missing here??

Nope, that sums it up in a nutshell.  I actually am in a similar
situation but with Rebel XT .cr2 files.  Basically I convert to DNG with
the 3.1 DNG converter, and then open the DNGs in PS CS which uses ACR
2.4 to convert to whatever Photoshop supported file format one wants.

I haven't used the ACR 3.2 plugin much because I don't use Elements 3.0
very often any more but I do recall it having more controls for
converting from DNG.

Greg

Signature

"Destroy your safe and happy lives before it is too late
The battles we fought were long and hard
Just not to be consumed by rock and roll" - The Mekons

This old Bob - 13 Dec 2005 22:22 GMT
> Perhaps you should check your facts before rushing to 'correct' people.
> Elements 3.0 has no problem using Camera Raw 3.x - I've run it with 3.1
> and 3.2, and I know of people using the 3.3 beta without problems
>
> While you can't use ACR 3.x with Photoshop CS - you need CS2 - there
> are no such restriction with Elements 3.0

You are my hero, John.  I didn't know this.
Ed Ruf  (REPLY to E-MAIL IN SIG!) - 08 Dec 2005 23:38 GMT
>So now I have a D70 I thought I'd buy some decent but affordable software, I
>eventually decided on Photoshop Elements 4 fortunatley I downloaded the
>trial version first to make sure it would read NEF files only to find that
>it won't work on anything other than XP. Bit research & I found that version
>3 will work on my Windows 2000 but Adobe don't sell it. How many customers
>will that lose them . I ended up buying the Nikon Capture software.

http://www.pricegrabber.com/search_getprod.php/masterid=4438485/search=photoshop
+elements+3

Signature

Ed Ruf    Lifetime AMA# 344007 (Usenet2@EdwardG.Ruf.com)
See images taken with my CP-990/5700 & D70 at
http://edwardgruf.com/Digital_Photography/General/index.html

Brion K. Lienhart - 10 Dec 2005 06:50 GMT
> So now I have a D70 I thought I'd buy some decent but affordable software, I
> eventually decided on Photoshop Elements 4 fortunatley I downloaded the
> trial version first to make sure it would read NEF files only to find that
> it won't work on anything other than XP. Bit research & I found that version
> 3 will work on my Windows 2000 but Adobe don't sell it. How many customers
> will that lose them . I ended up buying the Nikon Capture software.

So upgrade to Windows XP. It's the least sucky version of Windows yet.
larrylook - 12 Dec 2005 02:23 GMT
Bruce I have some advice.  This is a nice workflow (though a little time
consuming) that gives nice results.  Download Nikon View - it's free.  Use
it as a raw converter (you can change WB, exposure, etc there) and it
retains all in camera settings, which most 3rd party raw converters dont,
then import picture into elements, for final editing.  You may say "why use
2 programs when I can use 1.  Well after a lot of fooling around I guess I'm
now sold on the theory "nikon knows what nikon pics should look like
theory".  I suppose there's some "religion" here, not just science.  But I'm
happy using a nikon product for the raw conversion, but Adobe for final
touches, cropping etc.  You bring the raw file into Adove as a tiff or HQ
jpeg.  You don't need a Adobe raw converter for this flow.

> So now I have a D70 I thought I'd buy some decent but affordable software,
> I
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Best Wishes
>    Bruce
Ed Ruf  (REPLY to E-MAIL IN SIG!) - 12 Dec 2005 09:35 GMT
>Bruce I have some advice.  This is a nice workflow (though a little time
>consuming) that gives nice results.  Download Nikon View - it's free.  Use
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>touches, cropping etc.  You bring the raw file into Adove as a tiff or HQ
>jpeg.  You don't need a Adobe raw converter for this flow.

If all one uses for raw conversion is NV, you are missing out on a lot in
the process. I use a mixture of Nikon Capture, Raw Shooter Essential and
PSE3 at the moment. NV, which I've used for years btw, can't hold a candle
to any of these.
Signature

Ed Ruf    Lifetime AMA# 344007 (Usenet2@EdwardG.Ruf.com)
See images taken with my CP-990/5700 & D70 at
http://edwardgruf.com/Digital_Photography/General/index.html

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.