Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / September 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Minolta news

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
RichA - 07 Sep 2005 15:22 GMT
Konica Minolta to liquidate Canadian unit
Konica Minolta has decided to liquidate a wholly-owned Canadian unit
that sells digital cameras because of stiffer competition. The Japanese
company says the closure will not affect its forecast for the financial
year end in March 2006. The Canadian unit is valued at around CA$5.66m
(US$4.76m). Konica Minolta said that it will seek partners who can
distribute its cameras in Canada. (11:20 GMT)
from dpreview.com
burnsdavidj@yahoo.com - 07 Sep 2005 15:48 GMT
$5.66m liquidation? That sounds like office space and furniture, maybe
some real estate holdings and severance packages for local staff.

Doesn't sound like a big deal to be honest...with NAFTA most product is
shipped and supported from the US anyways.

Not that KM is in the order of Nikon / Canon here, but I doubt this
will have any negative effect on their sales (assuming KM doesn't
blunder the administrative handover).
Darrell - 08 Sep 2005 00:15 GMT
> $5.66m liquidation? That sounds like office space and furniture, maybe
> some real estate holdings and severance packages for local staff.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> will have any negative effect on their sales (assuming KM doesn't
> blunder the administrative handover).

From what I've been told KM USA doesn't want to sell to Canada as it causes
logistics headaches.
Basic Wedge - 08 Sep 2005 02:35 GMT
I can't say I'm surprised. Here in my part of Canada, I don't see anyone
using Minolta gear.

Rob
JPS@no.komm - 08 Sep 2005 02:43 GMT
>I can't say I'm surprised. Here in my part of Canada, I don't see anyone
>using Minolta gear.

I saw a guy with a Minolta DSLR in Central Park (NYC) on Monday.  He was
standing on Bow Bridge, taking pictures of all the woman with exposed
cleavage passing underneath in rowboats.
Signature


<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
  John P Sheehy         <JPS@no.komm>

><<> <>>< <>>< ><<> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>><
Tony   Polson - 08 Sep 2005 13:07 GMT
>>I can't say I'm surprised. Here in my part of Canada, I don't see anyone
>>using Minolta gear.
>
>I saw a guy with a Minolta DSLR in Central Park (NYC) on Monday.  He was
>standing on Bow Bridge, taking pictures of all the woman with exposed
>cleavage passing underneath in rowboats.

Did he have ugly teeth?  I mean *really* ugly teeth?

If so, Alan Browne must be in NYC this week.

;-)
DD (Rox) - 08 Sep 2005 07:09 GMT
> I can't say I'm surprised. Here in my part of Canada, I don't see anyone
> using Minolta gear.

You mean you haven't been exposed by Minolta Browne yet? Consider
yourself lucky.

Signature

Look. See. Click. Share.
www.leica.co.za
www.dallasdahms.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.