Bought a lens that came wth a Tiffen Haze filter. Cheap and nasty or good
and good value? How do they compare to Hoya filters. Did the seller simply
want to get rid of his rubbish.
Cheers.
Pete
> Bought a lens that came wth a Tiffen Haze filter. Cheap and nasty or good
> and good value? How do they compare to Hoya filters. Did the seller simply
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Pete
Hi Pete,
I am not up on the current state of the art in filters and optics.
However, back when I bought most of my lenses Tiffen and Hoya were
comparable.
It was sort of like...
Do you want a Ford or a Chevrolet. They both work, both are about the
same quality. You may have one filter that is a higher quality in one
size from Tiffen, and another in a different size from Hoya.
I sort of inherited a large collection of filters from my father when
he passed on. I kept a few, and gave most of them to a second hand
store.
Also gave the darkroom equipment to the second hand store (a church
charity store.) This was after setting up a darkroom in the house and
having a fairly long dicussion with my wife about the chemical smell in
the house.
Figured the darkroom needed to go... this was a while ago, but the
darkroom, and the FD mount canon cameras, and a couple of FD mount
lenes... went to the second hand store.
I did keep the museum pieces - the Crown Grapics and the Argus. Not
really sure what to do with them. Actually, they both work. I also
have film for both of them. I also have a Kiev 88. If someone wants
to learn about photography, I tell them they should start with one of
these... they say I am nuts. I tell them if they really want to learn
they should learn to use a light meter, and learn how to use a manual
camera. They can then apply it to an auto camera after that. If you
learn the mechanics, and how to take your time to frame the subject
with an all manual camera - it makes using the fancy digital cameras a
whole lot easier. They all think I am nuts.
Anyway, I got off topic from your subject. The Tiffen and the Hoya are
fairly interchangable. Hoya calls their UV filter UV and I believe
Tiffen calls their UV filter a Haze filter. Quality is about the same.
It may very from time to time depending on the lot, and the quality
control process in the glass plants. It also may very depending on the
size of the filter.
Use it and see if you like it, if you don't - get a Hoya filter, they
are around $20.
roland
Zed Pobre - 07 Sep 2005 21:17 GMT
> Anyway, I got off topic from your subject. The Tiffen and the Hoya are
> fairly interchangable. Hoya calls their UV filter UV and I believe
> Tiffen calls their UV filter a Haze filter. Quality is about the same.
I can't speak to the quality of the UV filters, but the Tiffen
polarizers suck. I suffered very nasty loss of contrast on my last
trip to Yosemite with pretty much all of the pictures for which I used
the polarizer (I had one at 58mm and one at 67mm)... which I put on,
ironically enough, to try to cut haze and improve contrast.
Also, there is actually a difference between straight UV, UV Haze, UV
Haze 2, and UV Skylight filters, in terms of exactly what wavelengths
are blocked. I'm not immediately conversant with the exact
differences, at the moment, though. If someone has experience with a
Haze 2b versus a polarizer for cutting haze and improving contrast,
I'd like to know how it worked out, since polarizers are not so great
for wide-angle lenses.

Signature
Zed Pobre <zed@resonant.org> a.k.a. Zed Pobre <zed@debian.org>
PGP key and fingerprint available on finger; encrypted mail welcomed.
I won't put Tiffen on any lens I own. Years ago I was assessing the
affect of linear vs. circular polarizers. I had a Tiffen linear, and
as I rotated it in front of my eye, I could easily see the distortion
caused by the fact that the two surfaces of the filter were NOT
PARALLEL, effectively making it a prism!
Hoya makes a number of filter lines, from really cheap to really great.
Look for SMC on the box or the Pro series or the super thin series.
Avoid any uncoated filter from anyone!
David Littlewood - 08 Sep 2005 22:14 GMT
>I won't put Tiffen on any lens I own. Years ago I was assessing the
>affect of linear vs. circular polarizers. I had a Tiffen linear, and
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Avoid any uncoated filter from anyone!
However, note that some very respectable brands multi-coat only the rear
face. This is perfectly reasonable; a couple of percent of the incident
light reflected from the front is simply lost and gone from the system;
a couple of percent reflected from the rear face bounces around inside
the system and is quite likely to contribute to flare.
David

Signature
David Littlewood
Thanks everyone, appreciate the input.
> Bought a lens that came wth a Tiffen Haze filter. Cheap and nasty or good
> and good value? How do they compare to Hoya filters. Did the seller simply
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Pete