Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

New Aussie photo law?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
RichA - 15 Aug 2005 06:06 GMT
Web pic law canvassed

DPreview.com:

AUGUST 09, 2005
POSTING unauthorised photos of children on the internet could be
outlawed under options raised in a discussion paper.

Releasing the paper, Victorian Attorney-General Rob Hulls called for a
national strategy to combat the publication of unauthorised photos on
the internet.

The push follows recent incidents where photos were taken of Victorian
school children at sporting events and then posted on the net, in some
cases with links to sexually explicit websites.

The discussion paper, released on behalf of all state and territory
attorneys-general, reviews the adequacy of existing laws around
Australia.

Other options for new offences include criminalising the taking and
posting of offensive photos of people in situations where they have a
reasonable expectation of privacy.

The paper also canvasses non-legislative approaches such as education
campaigns about privacy, mobile phone cameras and existing regulation
of online content.

Mr Hulls said the law needed to keep up to date with new and emerging
technology, such as the increased use of digital and mobile phones.

Mr Hulls urged community members to comment on the issues, with
submissions closing on October 14.

AAP

"Bittorrents are REFUNDS for all the BAD movie products Hollywood
never gave us refunds for in the past"
Charles - 15 Aug 2005 06:30 GMT
>Web pic law canvassed
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>"Bittorrents are REFUNDS for all the BAD movie products Hollywood
>never gave us refunds for in the past"

Good idea.  Authorized by whom.  Will the government set up as bureau
to authorize such postings.  Or to act as a central registry for said
authorizations?
pixby - 15 Aug 2005 22:37 GMT
> Good idea.  Authorized by whom.  Will the government set up as bureau
> to authorize such postings.  Or to act as a central registry for said
> authorizations?

Authorized as in authorized by the parents or guardians of the children.
It has long been a case in Australia that you have no explicit right
*NOT* to have your photo taken unless the photographer has to move onto
private land the person being photographed owns, to take the picture.

Clearly this is 100% the opposite to French law. All we need is to find
the halfway point and no one will be satisfied... As is the aim of all
democratic nations!

Signature

Douglas,
You never really make it on the 'net
until you get your own personal Troll.
Mine's called Chrlz. Don't feed him, he bites!

John Phillips - 17 Aug 2005 12:57 GMT
> POSTING unauthorised photos of children on the internet could be
> outlawed under options raised in a discussion paper.

Yes.  We are becoming a country of "can do", to a country of "can't do".

Signature

/////////// POLICE TAGLINE - DO NOT CROSS \\\\\\\

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.