Imagine if they used one of these in a DSLR. Just consider the
physical size/resolution capability of it. Of course low ISO
speeds would only be usable, owing to noise, but imagine if
Pentax brought out another 110-sized DSLR based on one of these
products? A DSLR you could pocket. And for tradition DSLR sizes,
image if their waferfab could turn out a full frame sensor with this
technology. What would that be, around 140 megapixel image sizes??
Would there even be a lens good enough to use with it?
-Rich
May 18, 2005
Micron CMOS image sensor has smallest pixel size
By Yoshiko Hara
TOKYO Micron Technology Inc. has developed a CMOS image sensor which
the company claims has the smallest pixel size for imagers.
Micron's 1.7- x 1.7-micron image sensor is the sixth generation on its
roadmap after a 2.2-micron version. The latest version is scheduled to
hit the market next year. When produced in volume, however, the
1.7-micron sensors will have a pixel size of 1.75 micron.
Micron is now offering a 2-megapixel sensor composed of 2.8- x
2.8-micron pixels in volume quantities. The company will begin volume
production of 3- and 5-megapixel sensors based on 2.2-micron
technology later this year.
According to Hisayuki Suzuki, Micron's senior marketing director for
imaging, "Shrinking pixel size enables higher resolution of about 8
megapixels. Making use of the high resolution, customers can have more
design freedom."
Micron is currently shipping as many as 10 million CMOS image sensors
a month. "We will surely become the top supplier of image sensors
within this year," Suzuki predicted.
Micron's strategy is to convert its depreciated DRAM lines for image
sensor production, give the company a cost advantage. While Japanese
competitors like Sony and Sharp building expensive new 300-mm wafer
lines for image sensor production, Micron can convert its obsolete
DRAM lines to mixed-product lines with a relatively small investment.
Bigguy - 08 Aug 2005 14:13 GMT
Surely reduced pixel size equals reduced sesitivity and therefore increased
noise when extra gain is added...?
Guy
> Imagine if they used one of these in a DSLR. Just consider the
> physical size/resolution capability of it. Of course low ISO
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> lines for image sensor production, Micron can convert its obsolete
> DRAM lines to mixed-product lines with a relatively small investment.
l e o - 08 Aug 2005 15:36 GMT
> Surely reduced pixel size equals reduced sesitivity and therefore increased
> noise when extra gain is added...?
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>>lines for image sensor production, Micron can convert its obsolete
>>DRAM lines to mixed-product lines with a relatively small investment.
It doesn't matter. The marketing department has the say:
< According to Hisayuki Suzuki, Micron's senior marketing director for
imaging, "Shrinking pixel size enables higher resolution of about 8
megapixels. Making use of the high resolution, customers can have more
design freedom." >
Most customers don't know the bad sideffects. If they do, they know what
the solution is but unfortunately, that also spells BIG BUCKS.
BC - 08 Aug 2005 15:32 GMT
> Imagine if they used one of these in a DSLR. Just consider the
> physical size/resolution capability of it. Of course low ISO
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Would there even be a lens good enough to use with it?
> -Rich
I imagine the best application for 1.7 micron pixels will be for cell
phones, where you could get 6MP on a tiny 1/3" sensor. Nyquist is
about 300 cycles/mm, but that shouldn't be insurmountable. Look for
some *spectacular* cell phone cameras in the future.
Brian
Brian Baird - 09 Aug 2005 06:13 GMT
Imagine the image noise!

Signature
http://www.pbase.com/bcbaird
westin@graphics.cornell.nospam.edu - 10 Aug 2005 19:23 GMT
> Imagine if they used one of these in a DSLR. Just consider the
> physical size/resolution capability of it. Of course low ISO
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Would there even be a lens good enough to use with it?
> -Rich
How about this instead?
<http://www.panavisionsvi.com/>
Only 8MP, but at 30 frames per second!

Signature
-Stephen H. Westin
Any information or opinions in this message are mine: they do not
represent the position of Cornell University or any of its sponsors.