Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Just THINK of the resolution!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
RichA - 08 Aug 2005 08:03 GMT
Imagine if they used one of these in a DSLR.  Just consider the
physical size/resolution capability of it.  Of course low ISO
speeds would only be usable, owing to noise, but imagine if
Pentax brought out another 110-sized DSLR based on one of these
products?  A DSLR you could pocket. And for tradition DSLR sizes,
image if their waferfab could turn out a full frame sensor with this
technology.  What would that be, around 140 megapixel image sizes??
Would there even be a lens good enough to use with it?
-Rich

May 18, 2005

Micron CMOS image sensor has smallest pixel size

By Yoshiko Hara    
TOKYO — Micron Technology Inc. has developed a CMOS image sensor which
the company claims has the smallest pixel size for imagers.

Micron's 1.7- x 1.7-micron image sensor is the sixth generation on its
roadmap after a 2.2-micron version. The latest version is scheduled to
hit the market next year. When produced in volume, however, the
1.7-micron sensors will have a pixel size of 1.75 micron.

Micron is now offering a 2-megapixel sensor composed of 2.8- x
2.8-micron pixels in volume quantities. The company will begin volume
production of 3- and 5-megapixel sensors based on 2.2-micron
technology later this year.

According to Hisayuki Suzuki, Micron's senior marketing director for
imaging, "Shrinking pixel size enables higher resolution of about 8
megapixels. Making use of the high resolution, customers can have more
design freedom."

Micron is currently shipping as many as 10 million CMOS image sensors
a month. "We will surely become the top supplier of image sensors
within this year," Suzuki predicted.

Micron's strategy is to convert its depreciated DRAM lines for image
sensor production, give the company a cost advantage. While Japanese
competitors like Sony and Sharp building expensive new 300-mm wafer
lines for image sensor production, Micron can convert its obsolete
DRAM lines to mixed-product lines with a relatively small investment.
Bigguy - 08 Aug 2005 14:13 GMT
Surely reduced pixel size equals reduced sesitivity and therefore increased
noise when extra gain is added...?

Guy

> Imagine if they used one of these in a DSLR.  Just consider the
> physical size/resolution capability of it.  Of course low ISO
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> lines for image sensor production, Micron can convert its obsolete
> DRAM lines to mixed-product lines with a relatively small investment.
l e o - 08 Aug 2005 15:36 GMT
> Surely reduced pixel size equals reduced sesitivity and therefore increased
> noise when extra gain is added...?
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>>lines for image sensor production, Micron can convert its obsolete
>>DRAM lines to mixed-product lines with a relatively small investment.

It doesn't matter. The marketing department has the say:

< According to Hisayuki Suzuki, Micron's senior marketing director for
imaging, "Shrinking pixel size enables higher resolution of about 8
megapixels. Making use of the high resolution, customers can have more
design freedom." >

Most customers don't know the bad sideffects. If they do, they know what
the solution is but unfortunately, that also spells BIG BUCKS.
BC - 08 Aug 2005 15:32 GMT
> Imagine if they used one of these in a DSLR.  Just consider the
> physical size/resolution capability of it.  Of course low ISO
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Would there even be a lens good enough to use with it?
> -Rich

I imagine the best application for 1.7 micron pixels will be for cell
phones, where you could get 6MP on a tiny 1/3" sensor.  Nyquist is
about 300 cycles/mm, but that shouldn't be insurmountable.  Look for
some *spectacular* cell phone cameras in the future.

Brian
Brian Baird - 09 Aug 2005 06:13 GMT
Imagine the image noise!

Signature

http://www.pbase.com/bcbaird

westin@graphics.cornell.nospam.edu - 10 Aug 2005 19:23 GMT
> Imagine if they used one of these in a DSLR.  Just consider the
> physical size/resolution capability of it.  Of course low ISO
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Would there even be a lens good enough to use with it?
> -Rich

How about this instead?
<http://www.panavisionsvi.com/>

Only 8MP, but at 30 frames per second!

Signature

-Stephen H. Westin
Any information or opinions in this message are mine: they do not
represent the position of Cornell University or any of its sponsors.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.