 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / January 2005DigiReb & Sigma Flash
A new Sigma EF-500 DG Super ETTL flash showed up yesterday, so last night I hooked it to my DigiReb when some friends came over, and took some indoor shots. Nearly all of the them came out underexposed - anywhere from "significantly" to "majorly" underexposed. I tried both in Av and automatic modes, and both modes seemed to do about the same - most shots underexposed (subject and foreground), and just a few where either the subject was at least properly exposed, or (in a couple of cases) the entire scene was properly exposed. Any ideas why that would be? Earlier today, I shot a quick shot with and without the Sigma, and here's what I got: http://www.codon.com/flash steve > A new Sigma EF-500 DG Super ETTL flash showed up yesterday, so last night >I hooked it to my DigiReb when some friends came over, and took some indoor [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >least properly exposed, or (in a couple of cases) the entire scene was >properly exposed. Any ideas why that would be? I've found neither my D60 or 20D work with my two Vivitar Canon dedicated flash units, the flash output is always too low when I use the hot show in any exposure mode and the cameras don't recognize that a flash unit is attached (ie it allows faster than sych shutter speeds). My workaround was to connect the flash unit to the camera's PC terminal and shoot manually using guide numbers. Ron Ron Lacey Murillo Ontario ron@ronsfotos.com > I've found neither my D60 or 20D work with my two Vivitar Canon > dedicated flash units, the flash output is always too low when I use [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Ron I have also wanted a flash for a 300D, but here in NZ there is a considerable waiting list for 550/580EX guns, and I have a wedding to do in two weeks ... I had decided to use my old faithful EOS 10 film camera one last time, because of the apparent exposure problems with e-ttl, even if I could lay hands on a 580EX. So, I decided to try my other old faithful - a Metz 45CL-4 handle-mount flash unit (Guide number 148 (feet) at 100 ISO), with the SCA311 adapter intended for the EOS 10. I checked the trigger voltage - 5 volts. Great. Fitted it to the 300D, and Voila! it flashed. Now because it is not communicating with the camera, I cannot use any metering from the camera to the flash, so it has to be manual. The Metz has its own exposure sensor on the handle, so you can set the gun to expose for, say, 200 ISO and f:8, and it meters itself. I set the 300D to manual, WB to 'flash', exposure 1/200 at f:8 at 200 ISO, and took some shots. They were spot on! excellent exposures. This now opens up a whole new range of possibilities. I can set the camera for backgound exposure with Av (fixed aperture), fill flash by setting the gun for 1 or 2 stops underexposure, and there it is. I can fire the flash off-camera with its extension cord, and I can fire other flashes with slaves, with no problems due to the e-ttl pre-flash, and I am immune to the blink syndrome that the preflash induces in some subjects. Not quite as automatic as a 580EX, maybe, but judging by the problems some posters are having with erratic exposures, I think I have a winner here. So, 580EX no longer wanted, thanks. Colin Cool hank >> I've found neither my D60 or 20D work with my two Vivitar Canon >> dedicated flash units, the flash output is always too low when I use [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > > Colin > So, I decided to try my other old faithful - a Metz 45CL-4 handle-mount > flash unit (Guide number 148 (feet) at 100 ISO), Yoiks! Don't you need a permit from the atomic energy board to carry around a small sun like that?? > This now opens up a whole new range of possibilities. I can set the > camera for backgound exposure with Av (fixed aperture), fill flash by [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > So, 580EX no longer wanted, thanks. Nice. My 420EX served well with my RebelG 35mm camera, and continues to do so on my DRebel, but there've been times I might have wished for a little more manual control... > > So, I decided to try my other old faithful - a Metz 45CL-4 handle-mount > > flash unit (Guide number 148 (feet) at 100 ISO), > > Yoiks! Don't you need a permit from the atomic energy board to carry > around a small sun like that?? It's what I call the V8 syndrome - lazy power but *grunt* when you need it {:-) Colin As a follow-up, if anyone cares, it seems to be a defective camera - I tried the EF-500-DG Super E-TTL, a Quantaray digital flash (borrowed from a friend who uses it on a DigiReb), and a Canon 520EX - all with exactly the same results, severely underexposed pics. On most shots, the entire upper half of the histogram would be completely zeros. So, the camera went back for exchange today. steve > A new Sigma EF-500 DG Super ETTL flash showed up yesterday, so last night > I hooked it to my DigiReb when some friends came over, and took some indoor [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > steve Are you SURE there is a defect rather than a setting on the camera ? I'd really like to know because I may be suffering the same malady.  SignatureDave | As a follow-up, if anyone cares, it seems to be a defective camera - I | tried the EF-500-DG Super E-TTL, a Quantaray digital flash (borrowed from a [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] | > | > steve > Are you SURE there is a defect rather than a setting on the camera ? > > I'd really like to know because I may be suffering the same malady. I can never be 100% sure. Because I didn't have the Canon 580ex in hand, Canon's tech support was entirely unwilling to help me in any way, shape, or form - the fact that I mentioned third-party flashes meant more to them than the fact that even *their* flash did exactly the same thing. The Canon rep *did* dance around, trying to hint (without ever saying) that because the DigiReb doesn't have flash compensation, I'd be screwed. On the other hand, I'd used a friend's DigiReb with an external flash, and it worked great. So, I did a "reset all settings" (or whatever it's called) on my camera, and borrowed my friend's. I went through all of his settings to be sure they were identical to mine, then did side-by-side tests with each of the flashes in each of the camera. In every case, his exposed *far* more correctly than mine, although there his did underexpose by a just a small amount on a couple. At that point, when the problem was entirely reproduceable, where one camera worked just fine and the other didn't - same scene, same settings, same shooting - I decided that there just wasn't anything else I could do, and it was up to Canon. If I get a new camera back and it does the same thine, I'll feel awfully foolish - but the good exposures with the other DigiReb make me believe that the new camera will work much better than the last. We'll see in a couple of days! steve |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.