Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Try again. Which wide angle for XT?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Master Chef Richard Campbell - 21 Jul 2005 22:59 GMT
Hi all,

I have a chance to get used wide angle zoom for my Canon 350/XT. I have a
choice of two. Both are used from a newspaper photographer. He just got a
Canon 1D and selling his EF-S lenses. The first one is a Sigma Zoom Super
Wide Angle 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM Auto focus (NIB). The second is a
Tokina Zoom Super Wide Angle AF 12-24mm f/4 AT-X 124AF Pro DX Auto focus
(About 4 months old). He has offered them to me at the same price. Which is
the best lens? Is $425 a fair price for these?

I know that I originally asked about the Sigma 12-24mm but that was a
mistake. Sorry for that.

Signature

Master Chef Richard Campbell

100% Delightfully Evil for Your Protection

--
Master Chef Richard Campbell
100% Delightfully Evil for Your Protection

frederick - 21 Jul 2005 23:39 GMT
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I know that I originally asked about the Sigma 12-24mm but that was a
> mistake. Sorry for that.

Why don't you try them both, and report back?
I'd be interested in your opinion.
$425 doesn't sound like a bargain - IIRC the Tokina is $500 new.
I read reviews that say it is great - with almost no CA, and others that
say the CA is bad.
Master Chef Richard Campbell - 22 Jul 2005 01:59 GMT
> Why don't you try them both, and report back?
> I'd be interested in your opinion.
> $425 doesn't sound like a bargain - IIRC the Tokina is $500 new.
> I read reviews that say it is great - with almost no CA, and others
> that say the CA is bad.

Fred,

I wish. The one that I don't buy goes to his 16 year old daughter. She is
working off getting my 300D by babysitting for us one night a week for the
next year. I asked him what she was doing to pay off the lens and he said
that she has to clean up after the dog in their backyard.

I tried them both out but wanted to double check my personal choice.

Signature

Master Chef Richard Campbell
100% Delightfully Evil for Your Protection

frederick - 22 Jul 2005 03:18 GMT
>>Why don't you try them both, and report back?
>>I'd be interested in your opinion.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> I tried them both out but wanted to double check my personal choice.

Which is?
Master Chef Richard Campbell - 22 Jul 2005 03:40 GMT
>> I tried them both out but wanted to double check my personal choice.
>>
> Which is?

I have to say that I liked the little extra wideness that the Sigma 10-20mm
gave but the Tokina 12-24mm was faster to focus and slightly sharper. But I
didn't like how the manual to auto focus push pull on the Tokina. So, I am
going to go with the Sigma 10-20mm.

Signature

Master Chef Richard Campbell
100% Delightfully Evil for Your Protection

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.