Boy... Am I please all the deciples of EOS got stuck into me when I
reckoned the FZ20 had better resolution at low light than the 20D. They
reckoned my highly scientific and impeccably detailed analysis of the
two cameras was wrong. The 20D couldn't possibly resolve less detail
than a Panasonic camera (who are Panasonic anyway) they cried.

Well, with my normal dedication and attention to detail I carried out
some more highly scientific tests. On low light, black point resolution
of the 20D this time. My findings are not good.

The ability to resolve detail at low light settings is pretty bad. I
don't know how I'm going to tell everyone this new revelation. Surely a
Canon camera costing $2000 with a lens which cost 20% more than the
camera couldn't possibly do this? Please don't be too hard on me this time.

http://www.ryadia.com/resolution.htm

Oh, yes, For Jeremy Nixon (and his sock puppet)...
This message was composed and typed by
Douglas, regardless of what the headers says!
Douglas's Care Factor is Zero.