> We are a NEW Online Stock Photo Agency that is looking for
> photographers and stock photos.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Bill Hansen
> RoyaltyFreePhotoMart.com
I don't work with stock photo houses, and if your payment percentage is
any criterion, I never will.
I do the work. You do the selling. You take 60%.
Not in this lifetime.
Even the worst writers' syndicates split 50-50.
Pete D - 13 Jul 2005 13:31 GMT
>> We are a NEW Online Stock Photo Agency that is looking for
>> photographers and stock photos.
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Even the worst writers' syndicates split 50-50.
And would you want to be associated with a site that has so many spelling
errors. Very unprofessional.
rbehunin@alumni.weber.edu - 13 Jul 2005 21:53 GMT
> > Bill Hansen
> > RoyaltyFreePhotoMart.com
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Even the worst writers' syndicates split 50-50.
I agree with Charlie that this Royalty Free Photo Mart is out of line
with their commission, 60% does seem a bit excessive.
However, Bill Hansen is out of line with this post on
rec.photo.digital.slr-systems. It belongs in rec.photo.marketplace as
it is of a commercial nature.
roland
> We are a NEW Online Stock Photo Agency that is looking for
> photographers and stock photos.
Selling royalty-free for $5? The industry could do without agencies like
that.

Signature
Jeremy | jeremy@exit109.com
Little Green Eyed Dragon - 13 Jul 2005 16:05 GMT
> > We are a NEW Online Stock Photo Agency that is looking for
> > photographers and stock photos.
>
> Selling royalty-free for $5? The industry could do without agencies like
> that.
Yup because they are probably making 200 at the least on most images.

Signature
Would thou choose to meet a rat eating dragon, or
a dragon, eating rat? The answer of: I am somewhere
in the middle.