Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Pentax *ist DS

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
leo - 14 Jun 2005 08:57 GMT
My friend bought a Pentax *ist DS kit at Costco for $760. It's a very
neat and small camera. The kit even comes with a case and a 128MB SM
card. We promptly bought a 1GB SanDisk Ultra II SD card and Costco has a
$15 discount for all 1GB Sandisk memory cards this week. It handles RAW
well. It's snappy when comparing to the original Canon Digital Rebel
which I had (and sold). Focusing is quick but is pretty bad under low
light situation when comparing to my Canon 20D. The 18-55mm lens is well
built. It puts Canon's same kit lens to shame. The focus ring is not
filmy as Canon's. The Canon 20D is easy to use without reading manual. I
had to dig the manual a bit for the *ist DS. Besides slow focusing in
low light, selecting the focusing point is clumsy. You have to do that
using a menu. The best feature of all the DSLR at that class, even
better than 20D, is the viewfinder. It's BIG and you can get a different
focusing screen. I wish Canon do that for their xxD series! If one is
new to SLR and don't need the vast selection of Canon or Nikon glasses
or IS, this is a very good choice.
Pete D - 14 Jun 2005 09:30 GMT
> My friend bought a Pentax *ist DS kit at Costco for $760. It's a very neat
> and small camera. The kit even comes with a case and a 128MB SM card. We
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> manual a bit for the *ist DS. Besides slow focusing in low light,
> selecting the focusing point is clumsy.

You need to read a bit more, you can select the focusing point on the move
with the four way switch.

Cheers.

You have to do that
> using a menu. The best feature of all the DSLR at that class, even better
> than 20D, is the viewfinder. It's BIG and you can get a different focusing
> screen. I wish Canon do that for their xxD series! If one is new to SLR
> and don't need the vast selection of Canon or Nikon glasses or IS, this is
> a very good choice.
Cheesehead - 14 Jun 2005 13:21 GMT
The low-light performance is due to the slow kit lens.
Put a fast, quality lens on it and it's as basically as good as the
others in its class.
I'm using 3 lenses on my DS:
K30/2.8, A35/2, FA50/1.4.  While only one of the 3 is AF, it works
beautifully.
IOW, a faster lens will cure the problem.

Every brand has it's trade-offs.  Nikon has the more rugged bodies and
the networking capabilities.  Canon has the very, very fast AF.  It
depends on what you need or want.

Also, the selection of Pentax glass is just as vast.  More depends on
the city you are in than anything else.  This is more of a trade-off
issue.  Nikon has a shifting bellows.  Canon has the super-fast AF (on
the better models).  Pentax has the outstanding 31mm & 77mm Limited
series lenses that will make you beg for more.
And a beautiful little 40/2.8 pancake -- a New AF version for film or
digital -- continuing the tradition of the old Pentax-M 40/2.8 pancake.
A very good lens.
The SD card system makes the Pentax more compact.

I didn't think the grip of the DS would be pleasant.  But I've gotten
used to it.
Battery life is very good.  The User Interface (UI) is ok.  Nothing
special.  (But then
nothing is as bad as the old Nikon N70.)

Lens compatability is excellent.  Get an old Super Multi Coated Takumar
50/1.4
and 35/2 and use 'em on your DS.  They work.  Not with a mechanical
i/f, but
you can take pictures with them.  Stop-down metering, the old fashioned
way.

For other lenses, the unique Pentax Reflex Zooms would be excellent for
sports like Soccer ("Football" for those on the metric system) and
wildlife.

You'll not lose anything with Pentax.  Every brand has its trade-offs.
Penatx is no slouch in the industry.  Maybe a little slow to market,
but very good stuff.

Collin
Ben Rosengart - 14 Jun 2005 16:08 GMT
> For other lenses, the unique Pentax Reflex Zooms would be excellent for
> sports like Soccer ("Football" for those on the metric system) and
> wildlife.

What unique about the "Pentax Reflex Zooms"?

Signature

Ben Rosengart                                            (212) 741-4400 x215
    Sometimes it only makes sense to focus our attention on those
    questions that are equal parts trivial and intriguing.
                                            --Josh Micah Marshall

Cheesehead - 14 Jun 2005 16:24 GMT
For a long time Pentax was the only mfg with such, unless Canon or
Nikon now have one.

http://www.pentaximaging.com/products/product_details/camera_lens--smc_P_Reflex_
400-600mm_F8-12/reqID--3056/subsection--Digital_35mm_zoom


A pretty compact 400-600 option.

(I don't keep up too much with hardware.  My new Java/Domino/Websphere
work
is too consuming.)
Ben Rosengart - 14 Jun 2005 16:38 GMT
> For a long time Pentax was the only mfg with such, unless Canon or
> Nikon now have one.
>
> http://www.pentaximaging.com/products/product_details/camera_lens--smc_P_Reflex_
400-600mm_F8-12/reqID--3056/subsection--Digital_35mm_zoom

>
> A pretty compact 400-600 option.

Ah -- a long telephoto-to-long telephoto zoom?  That is pretty neat.
Thanks for explaining.

Signature

Ben Rosengart                                            (212) 741-4400 x215
    Sometimes it only makes sense to focus our attention on those
    questions that are equal parts trivial and intriguing.
                                            --Josh Micah Marshall

John Francis - 14 Jun 2005 17:16 GMT
>> For a long time Pentax was the only mfg with such, unless Canon or
>> Nikon now have one.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Ah -- a long telephoto-to-long telephoto zoom?  That is pretty neat.

A long telephoto to long telephoto lightweight compact zoom.

Pentax also offer a 250-600/f5.6 zoom, but it's definitely not
a lens you could describe as either lightweight or compact.
Fred McKenzie - 14 Jun 2005 19:02 GMT
> For a long time Pentax was the only mfg with such, unless Canon or
> Nikon now have one.

http://www.pentaximaging.com/products/product_details/camera_lens--smc_P_Reflex_
400-600mm_F8-12/reqID--3056/subsection--Digital_35mm_zoom


> A pretty compact 400-600 option.

I tried a 500mm f/8 reflex lens on my *ist DS, and found it very difficult
to use.  This one wasn't made by Pentax, so it is probably not unique to
them.

The Pentax zoom reflex may be a nice, compact lens, but is it really
applicable to the *ist DS?  It is strictly manual focus.  At f/8 to f/12,
you probably can't even use the camera's AF system in focus-assist mode.
I would expect it to be "dark" in the viewfinder, so manual focus would be
difficult.  Perhaps a good nature lens when using a tripod, but maybe not
good for sports.

The only autofocus reflex lens I know of is the Minolta 500mm f/8 AF
reflex lens.  Zoom would be nice, but they would have to start with a
larger aperture so it didn't zoom to anything less than f/8, so AF could
work.

Fred
Cheesehead - 14 Jun 2005 19:08 GMT
I find myself occasionally using trap focus with longer lenses.
A very handy feature.
"Trap Focus" is this:
1.  Set the camera to Manual focus mode.
2.  Focus where the object will be.
3.  Hold down the shutter release.
4.  When the object comes into focus, the camera will fire.
Automatically.

(Is this feature unique to Pentax?  My Nikon acquaintenance was
intrigued by the feature.)

I've not tried this with sports, but it's certainly useful for people
in general.
A Tokina 80-200/2.8 is on its way to me, and I'm going to try it with
the DS' spot focus & birds in the back yard.

Collin
JD - 14 Jun 2005 19:45 GMT
>I find myself occasionally using trap focus with longer lenses.
> A very handy feature.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Collin

Collin, your "trap focus" concept baffles me. I've tried on my *istDs with a
Sigma 55-200 f/4-5.6 DC zoom (in manual mode) without success. Can you
please expand on your method?
Thanks and regards,
Jean.
Cheesehead - 15 Jun 2005 12:17 GMT
I had a brain death moment yesterday.
With a manual focus lens (I put on my A35/2) and set the camera to Auto
Focus.
Then follow the prodcedure.
JD - 15 Jun 2005 16:42 GMT
>I had a brain death moment yesterday.
> With a manual focus lens (I put on my A35/2) and set the camera to Auto
> Focus.
> Then follow the prodcedure.

Thanks for the answer, but I still don't get it...
Do you mean that you press the shutter realease halfway down and the camera
will fire when the subject gets into the pre-arranged focal distance?
John Francis - 15 Jun 2005 17:03 GMT
>>I had a brain death moment yesterday.
>> With a manual focus lens (I put on my A35/2) and set the camera to Auto
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Do you mean that you press the shutter realease halfway down and the camera
>will fire when the subject gets into the pre-arranged focal distance?

To be precise, the camera will fire when the central auto-focus sensor
indicates that there is an in-focus subect.  And it will only do that
if the shutter is pressed all the way down, not just halfway.

This only works with manual-focus lenses.
JD - 15 Jun 2005 18:12 GMT
>>Thanks for the answer, but I still don't get it...
>>Do you mean that you press the shutter realease halfway down and the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> This only works with manual-focus lenses.

Thanks John, I got it.
Now I have to think hard to find how this can be an advantage... after all,
isn't it faster to focus the good old way?
Could be of some use in sports mode maybe or when an elephant is
unexpectedly charging at you?
Jean.
Cheesehead - 15 Jun 2005 20:55 GMT
With walking people it works well.
I've not shot a wedding in a long time, but it might be nice to catch
those coming down the aisle and not have to fuss with any camera or
hand-twist delays.
I'm looking to try it with soccer in the near future.
And I'm looking for a way to make it work with AF lenses.
John Francis - 15 Jun 2005 22:17 GMT
>>>Thanks for the answer, but I still don't get it...
>>>Do you mean that you press the shutter realease halfway down and the
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>Now I have to think hard to find how this can be an advantage... after all,
>isn't it faster to focus the good old way?

If you think so, then just leave the camera set to manual focus mode.

But if you're waiting for a subject to show up at just the right place
(a bird on a bird table, or a race car at the apex of the turn), then
trap focus lets you get the shot when the framing is just right.
m II - 16 Jun 2005 04:48 GMT
> Thanks John, I got it.
> Now I have to think hard to find how this can be an advantage...

It's wonderful for frightening squirrels. Place camera at ground level. Set the
flash to fill mode. Place a few peanuts in front of the camera. When the little
creature comes into focus, WHAM!

Bwhhaaahhhaaaaahhaaaaaa

evil mike II
Marc Sabatella - 15 Jun 2005 22:50 GMT
> To be precise, the camera will fire when the central auto-focus sensor
> indicates that there is an in-focus subect.  And it will only do that
> if the shutter is pressed all the way down, not just halfway.
>
> This only works with manual-focus lenses.

Ah, this makes sense.  Brilliant!  For some reason I thought I had heard
this only worked on older Pentax film cameras, but I just tried it with
my DS and it works exactly as described.  Put camera in auto focus mode,
with manual focus lens on.  Focus where subject will be.  Press shutter
fully.  Wait for subject to appear.  Shutter releases when subject
reaches the focus point.  The only problem is that the camera does not
seem overly quick in noticing this, so the suibject may have moved a
little *out* of focus by the time the picture is actually taken.  This
is especially a problem if the lens is also manual aperture, unless you
are in full manual mode and have guessed an appropriate exposure for the
non-existent subject.  Otherwise, the camera will shoot at the widest
aperture, giving you the narrowest depth of focus, and smallest margin
for error in terms of when to actually snap the shutter.  But still,
cool trick.  Wish I had known about it a couple of weeks ago in
Florence, where I took the most beautifully composed, heart-warming shot
of a little girl in pink dancing to a gypsy band in a piazza, but
nothing was in focus.

--------------
Marc Sabatella
marc@outsideshore.com

The Outside Shore
Music, art, & educational materials:
http://www.outsideshore.com/
Andrew Haley - 14 Jul 2005 18:52 GMT
>>"Cheesehead" <dplotusnotes@yahoo.com> a ecrit:
>>>I had a brain death moment yesterday.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>camera will fire when the subject gets into the pre-arranged focal
>>distance?

> To be precise, the camera will fire when the central auto-focus sensor
> indicates that there is an in-focus subect.  And it will only do that
> if the shutter is pressed all the way down, not just halfway.

To my surprise, this works with a D2x (even with auto-focus lenses) if
you set Custom Setting a5 to "off".  I doubt I'll ever need it, but
hey, it's there...

Andrew.
Marc Sabatella - 14 Jun 2005 18:07 GMT
> Focusing is quick but is pretty bad under low
> light situation when comparing to my Canon 20D.

I'm assuming by "bad" you mean, slow (and ndeed, sometimes outright
failure).  This is largely due to the lack of a dedicated focus assist
lamp - if you aren't using flash (and I rarely do), then it's going to
be tough.  Tough enough, in fact that I routinely switch to manual focus
in these cases.  And like you say, this feels much better than on the
low end Canon kit lens.

> I
> had to dig the manual a bit for the *ist DS.

And it doesn't help that the manual is pretty poorly written.  But I
found the basic functions of the camera perfectly self-evident.
Selecting focus point doesn't interest me - if I need something other
than the basic autofocus, I switch to manual.  But FWIW, if you've got
the camera in the mode where you can select a focus point at all,
actually selecting it does not require a menu.  It seems another
reasonable option is to leave it at cetner focus all the time, focus
with the focus point centered, then reframe with the shutter held
halfway.  I actually do this with the default focus mode all the time,
and it generally works fine, but can still sometimes be fooled if the
focus point is not the closest major object in the field.

--------------
Marc Sabatella
marc@outsideshore.com

The Outside Shore
Music, art, & educational materials:
http://www.outsideshore.com/
leo - 15 Jun 2005 02:58 GMT
>>Focusing is quick but is pretty bad under low
>>light situation when comparing to my Canon 20D.
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> Music, art, & educational materials:
> http://www.outsideshore.com/

Indeed it's the kit lens. It's very slow and noisy. I can't switch the
focusing point without using the menu but I set it to center point it
would be fine.
Paul Mitchum - 15 Jun 2005 09:48 GMT
[..]
> Indeed it's the kit lens. It's very slow and noisy. I can't switch the
> focusing point without using the menu but I set it to center point it
> would be fine.

You use the menu to tell the camera you'll set the focus point yourself.
Then you set the focus point with the arrow keys.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.