Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Let the games begin -- design the best all round 20D kit

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Steven Toney - 29 May 2005 15:44 GMT
Ok everyone

I darn close to buying my 20D body for my September trip

Please give your thoughts on the optimum 20D outfit covering lenses in
focals from the teens to 300-400mm, include choice for macro photography
(flowers/bugs/seashells and head / shoulder portraits

This should be an outfit to cover numerous type of photograpy from
landscapes to wildlife to a walk around DC or other cities

bonus for covering this range of photograpy with good/best lenses, but
minimum functional set of lenese - remembering on travels you have to carry
all this stuff including chargers, batteries, image storage, etc,

All suggestions welcome from tri\monopods to cases on buidling the ultimate
vacation outfit

thanks
Mr. Mark - 29 May 2005 16:33 GMT
> All suggestions welcome from tri\monopods to cases on buidling the ultimate
> vacation outfit

Here's the ultimate vacation kit.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Canon/canon_sd500.asp
Coupled with a 3gb mini drive and a couple extra batteries.

This is one you'll always have on you, even if you're just going out to
dinner, unlike the big heavy 20d.  The best photo is the one you don't miss
because you left your camera at home. :)

Signature

Mark

Photos, Ideas & Opinions
http://www.marklauter.com

David J Taylor - 29 May 2005 17:02 GMT
>> All suggestions welcome from tri\monopods to cases on buidling the
>> ultimate vacation outfit
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> to dinner, unlike the big heavy 20d.  The best photo is the one you
> don't miss because you left your camera at home. :)

I was going to suggest the Panasonic FZ5/FZ20 for just the same reasons!

David
Steven Toney - 29 May 2005 17:16 GMT
As mentioned -- I have some P&S's and all their trimmings -- I asking for
thoughts on lenses and accessories built around the 20D for a good/great
vacation outfit covering trips to nice senic parks and interesting cities.
best outfit, but not going overboard on weight and too many lenses

>>> All suggestions welcome from tri\monopods to cases on buidling the
>>> ultimate vacation outfit
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> David
Mr. Mark - 29 May 2005 22:10 GMT
> As mentioned -- I have some P&S's and all their trimmings -- I asking for
> thoughts on lenses and accessories built around the 20D for a good/great
> vacation outfit covering trips to nice senic parks and interesting cities.
> best outfit, but not going overboard on weight and too many lenses

We're just funning with you a little.  Cheer up. :)

I'd find the freakin' widest angle lens I could find for that thing and I'd
spare no expense to get it.  Maybe there's a 10mm?  Smaller would be better
since there's like a 1.6 multiplier.

Signature

Mark

Photos, Ideas & Opinions
http://www.marklauter.com

Mr. Mark - 29 May 2005 22:09 GMT
> > This is one you'll always have on you, even if you're just going out
> > to dinner, unlike the big heavy 20d.  The best photo is the one you
> > don't miss because you left your camera at home. :)
>
> I was going to suggest the Panasonic FZ5/FZ20 for just the same reasons!

Small cameras are like the American Express card.  You never leave home
without them. :)

Signature

Mark

Photos, Ideas & Opinions
http://www.marklauter.com

Steven Toney - 29 May 2005 17:12 GMT
Thanks

I already have a few P&S digital Olympus C-750UZ and C-5050Z -- they work
fine, but looking a for an always in the pocket ultracompact is a good idea

steve

>> All suggestions welcome from tri\monopods to cases on buidling the
> ultimate
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> miss
> because you left your camera at home. :)
Mr. Mark - 29 May 2005 22:22 GMT
> Thanks
>
> I already have a few P&S digital Olympus C-750UZ and C-5050Z -- they work
> fine, but looking a for an always in the pocket ultracompact is a good idea

Actually, I swore that I'd never buy another Sony anything, but some of
their super compacts are so light and thin that I might change my mind.  I
also love their large LCD's.

Oh, I just thought of some things you need for your 20d -

1. you need extra battery, charger, and you need a european adaptor for
their wonky power outlets over there.. unless you're european and then you
need an american adaptor for our wonky power outlets over here. :)

2. an off camera shoe cord (so you can hold your flash at different angles)

3. and most of all - I want one of these myself... an "angle finder"

http://www.canoncompanystore.com/epages/annex.storefront?ProductDetail=2882A002AA

or

http://tinyurl.com/a92el

I'd kill my best friend for one of those.

Signature

Mark

Photos, Ideas & Opinions
http://www.marklauter.com

Steven Toney - 29 May 2005 22:34 GMT
I could see that being use with the camera mounted on a telescope for
astronomy -- I'm not there yet - LOL

I tend to go a bit overboard on the accessories

>> Thanks
>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> I'd kill my best friend for one of those.
Mr. Mark - 31 May 2005 15:45 GMT
> > 3. and most of all - I want one of these myself... an "angle finder"

http://www.canoncompanystore.com/epages/annex.storefront?ProductDetail=2882A002AA

> I could see that being use with the camera mounted on a telescope for
> astronomy -- I'm not there yet - LOL

Astronomy?  Heck no!  This is so you don't have to lay prone every time you
want to take a low angle shot.  This was the first major problem I had to
overcome when I left my digital with rotating back to the world of SLR's.  I
still don't have an angle finder because I'm saving up for a 20d or Rebel XT
and a V. wide lens, but it's on my gift wish list at amazon.com and I hope
that one day someone will buy it for me. Frankly, I'm getting tired of
laying in the muck with the ticks and spiders and snakes just to get a good
shot. :)

Signature

Mark

Photos, Ideas & Opinions
http://www.marklauter.com

James Of Tucson - 30 May 2005 00:20 GMT
Speaking now from a bit of experience, I'd suggest you get two lenses,
maybe three:

The widest angle lens you can find.  Wide angle turns out to be a tall
order on these 1.6:1 cameras.  You mentioned your motivation of
photographing scenery.  You need wide angle to do landscapes and
waterfalls and so on.  I've been frustrated even with the 18mm end of
the 18-55 kit lens (which feels crummy, but does not perform badly).
I'm now in the market for something like a 12mm prime, and I want a
really, really good one.

Then you probably want a 200mm prime.  For those situations where I
think I want a zoom lens (birds), I'm realizing that what I really want
is just the long end of the zoom.  And a prime will certainly be much
better than a 70-200 zoom at 200mm.

On the other hand, the IS zooms are really great lenses.  People are
getting results with a 20d and an "L" zoom that are good enough for any
pro quality standards.  [They'd better!  A 20D and an L Zoom is a $3000
camera!]

One lens you would probably enjoy having is the 50mm f/1.4 (NOT the
f/1.8!)  It is a great lens; the only one I have so far that I actually
consider to be very good.

I have a Tamron 28-200mm zoom.  It's not at all good for wildlife or
birds, very soft at the long end.  But at moderate lengths it's pretty
good!  Definitely worth the sub $300 price.  (I know I need and EF/L
zoom, but that's not going to happen unless you buy me one.  So I'm
working with the lenses I *can* have.)

There's another issue that you might want to consider.  You can get so
*close* to great results with these cameras, that you may end up being
frustrated to the point that drives you into the medium format film
world, or worse.

I've seen guys show up at several places I've visited this spring with
their hassy's and so on, and once even shot a lighthouse after waiting
for a guy to do one with his field camera.  (He was quite quick about
it, it was impressive.  I think there must be something very satisfying
when you take your shot with your view camera and you have good
confidence that you got the exposure you expected.

Oh well...

As for tripods, I'm really happy with my Velbon GB347.  I'll be in the
market soon for a carbon fiber tripod with a ballhead (something that
substantially contributes to the cost of the $1600 zoom lens I'm
looking at!), but the Velbon is pretty nice, and plenty portable, it
doesn't encumber me at all, even on fairly difficult hikes.

One thing I'd consider also, as an "accessory" to your 20D, is a small
Canon camera, one of the  better Powershot models.  They are very high
quality, and in some situations have performed better than equivalent
photos taken with the 20D (which is a bit disturbing).  Canon
point/shoot cameras have quite similar exposure controls to the SLRs,
so they translate well.  

Gotta go board my plane, right now.
Mr. Mark - 31 May 2005 15:48 GMT
> Then you probably want a 200mm prime.  For those situations where I
> think I want a zoom lens (birds), I'm realizing that what I really want
> is just the long end of the zoom.  And a prime will certainly be much
> better than a 70-200 zoom at 200mm.

I'm finding that to be true on both ends of the spectrum.  I shoot either
full short or long, almost never in the middle except at events.  But 200 is
almost never long enough.  In 35 mm terms I'd like a 15mm, 50mm, 100mm and
400mm.  I think that would cover every situation I am likely to encounter.

Signature

Mark

Photos, Ideas & Opinions
http://www.marklauter.com

James Of Tucson - 31 May 2005 17:24 GMT
"But 200 is
almost never long enough."

A 200mm lens on a 1.6:1 camera is similar field of view with a 320mm on
a 35mm SLR, with the advantage that wider aperatures are available.  I
consider it the longest lens that can be used reliably in a handheld
fashion.  But I haven't yet experienced the image stabilizing
technology that might alter all my assumptions.

A colleague of mine has one of the "L/IS"  zooms, and the 1.4x
teleconverter.  The results look good to me (not merely "good", but
really, really good).

They'd better be, from a $1600 lens.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.