 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / Digital Photography / DSLR Cameras / May 2005Website "theft??"
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1018&message=13658720 Have his web host shut it down. > http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1018&message=13658720  SignaturePaul Furman http://www.edgehill.net/1 san francisco native plants > Have his web host shut it down. > >> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1018&message=13658720 If you can convice them the direction of migration was from A to B, rather than vice versa. > http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1018&message=13658720 Who is Lawrence? If you look at the page info his page was modified on 12 May. The one by Zero was modified on 26 May. I don't know if this proves anything... Also, looking at the source code the comment tags are identical although the source itself isn't: Zero's is scruffy and twice the size. Although, both sites appear to have been made using templates. Craig. >>http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1018&message=13658720 > > Who is Lawrence? If you look at the page info his page was modified on 12 > May. The one by Zero was modified on 26 May. I don't know if this proves > anything... Goggle cached versions could show who was first perhaps. > Also, looking at the source code the comment tags are > identical although the source itself isn't: Zero's is scruffy and twice the > size. Although, both sites appear to have been made using templates. > > Craig. SignaturePaul Furman http://www.edgehill.net/1 san francisco native plants I personally see both sides of this... Being that the internet started out as a bohemian place where everything was free and people were encouraged to learn off each other, early web design articles preached that it was right to "steal" ideas from other websites... Anything to get the net looking good and growing... I myself have cut and pasted, then altered to suit my needs, other websites for my own personal (not for profit) use. On the other hand, now that the Internet is a "place were people are encouraged to try to get rich quick", and there are those who make a living out of web design, and from their bought and paid for site designes..... I can see how the originator of said website would be pissed about the pretty blatant theft. I personally wouldn't do more than bitch at the offender, and as was mentioned, take it as a compliment. But then I don't do websites (either make or use) for money at the moment. And besides, I suck at it... =) Al... >>>http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1018&message=13658720 >> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >> >> Craig. >Goggle cached versions could show who was first perhaps. What about the Wayback Machine? http://www.archive.org/ ---------- Ed Ruf Lifetime AMA# 344007 (Usenet@EdwardG.Ruf.com) See images taken with my CP-990/5700 & D70 at http://edwardgruf.com/Digital_Photography/General/index.html |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.