Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / September 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

102 Print Developer

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Lloyd Erlick - 20 Sep 2007 21:41 GMT
September 20, 2007, from Lloyd Erlick,

I've been having beautiful results on Ilford
Warmtone FB material (MGW) with this
developer...

Prints are gorgeous after selenium toning. (I
use KRST diluted 1+5, for ten minutes, at
about 32-34C.)

____________________________________
102 Print Developer
(Original due to Edmund Lowe)
Potassium Version,
Working Solution.

Distilled Water              1000 ml
   at working temperature.

Potassium Sulfite
Anhydrous                          15 g

Potassium Phosphate        32 g
Tribasic monohydrate

Glycin                                    6 g

Potassium Bromide             5 g
______________________________________
Richard Knoppow - 21 Sep 2007 01:47 GMT
> September 20, 2007, from Lloyd Erlick,
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Potassium Bromide             5 g
> ______________________________________

    An interesting formula. I don't think I've seen another
print developer with Glycin as the sole developing agent.
Mostly, it seems to be used in conjunction with Hydroqinon
or both Hydroquinone and Metol as in Agfa/Ansco 130 but
there is no reason it should not work on its own as a warm
tone developer.
    How active is it? I mean how long is  your developing
time and does it seem to have any effect on paper speed?

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

Nicholas O. Lindan - 21 Sep 2007 03:40 GMT
> "Lloyd Erlick" <Lloyd at @the-wire. dot com> wrote
> > 102 Print Developer (Original due to Edmund Lowe [edwal])
> > .... Potassium Phosphate 32 g ...
> An interesting formula.

What does the Phosphate do?

> I don't think I've seen another print developer with Glycin as the sole
> developing agent.

Makes sense ... is there a warm-tone using just phenidone, sort
of a POTA for Paper?

Signature

Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Darkroom Automation: F-Stop Timers, Enlarging Meters
http://www.darkroomautomation.com/index.htm
n o lindan at ix dot netcom dot com

Richard Knoppow - 21 Sep 2007 08:03 GMT
>> "Lloyd Erlick" <Lloyd at @the-wire. dot com> wrote
>> > 102 Print Developer (Original due to Edmund Lowe
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> sort
> of a POTA for Paper?

   AFAIK no. The problem is that Phenidone and sulfite is
just not very active. Its possible it might work in a
stronger Alkali.
   That's why it produces such low contrast. Most of the
warm tone formulas I have are very old. They contain
Hydroquinone alone, Hydroquinone with Glycin,
Chlorohydroquinone and I have even seen a formula for
devloping prints in Pyro.
   Warm tone developrs can be made with Phenidone, I think
Ilford has a formula.
   BTW, I found a couple of Edwal formulas by searching
Google Patents. Both were fine grain film developers.

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

Lloyd Erlick - 21 Sep 2007 13:57 GMT
>Most of the
>warm tone formulas I have are very old.

September 21, 2007, from Lloyd Erlick,

They would be interesting to see. Would it be
a lot of work to post them in a chunk?

regards,
--le
Richard Knoppow - 21 Sep 2007 23:15 GMT
>>Most of the
>>warm tone formulas I have are very old.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> regards,
> --le

    These are mostly pretty well known formulas like Kodak
D-52 and a couple of Agfa/Ansco formulas. Gevaert also had
some formulas which seem to have been unique to them.
    Some of these developers are simply lower activity
versions of standard developers, them main difference being
lower pH. A couple use Hydroquinone as the sole developing
agent and a couple use Glycin. I have to look for the
Pyrochatachin and the Chlorhydroquinon formulas, I don't
remember which book they are in.
    Reportedly standard staining Pyro film developers, like
the familiar ABC formula, work on paper and produce a stain
image. This might be interesting to experiment with. Pyro
stain is a pigment, not a dye, so its quite permanent.

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

Lloyd Erlick - 22 Sep 2007 10:36 GMT
>I don't
>remember which book they are in.

September 22, 2007, from Lloyd Erlick,

Or which box the book is in??? (well, this is
true of me. sigh.)

--le
Lloyd Erlick - 21 Sep 2007 13:57 GMT
>What does the Phosphate do?

September 21, 2007, from Lloyd Erlick,

Well, now you're getting technical. I guess
it takes the place of carbonates in other
developers, so it's the accelerator. Mostly
I'm a follower in photo chemistry. So if
Adams says Ansco 120 is good, I'm willing to
go along and base all my variations on that.

Edmund Lowe specified sodium phosphate (TSP)
in 102. I just found a potassium version of
the same chemical and tried it out (my
supplier labeled it Potassium Phosphate
Tribasic, Monohydrate). I also reduced the
amount of sulfite by nearly half, because
potassium sulfite is hard to get. I can't see
any effect of the reduction in print results.

Basically I viewed it as an easy way to get
to know Glycin with very little associated
chemistry.

regards,
--le
Richard Knoppow - 21 Sep 2007 23:10 GMT
>>What does the Phosphate do?
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> regards,
> --le

     This substance is known better as Tri-Sodium-Phosphate
or TSP and is the same as the cleaning material. It is not
used much now because phosphates are water polutants. TSP
is, besides being a fairly high pH alkali a sequestering
agent for some of the salts in hard water. There are
numerous developer formulas using it although I don't have a
ready list. I am not sure what, if any, special properties
TSP has photographically. It seems to have been used mainly
to prevent sludging or deposition in developing tanks due to
hard water.

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

Lloyd Erlick - 22 Sep 2007 10:42 GMT
>Tri-Sodium-Phosphate
>or TSP and is the same as the cleaning material. It is not
>used much now because phosphates are water polutants.

September 22, 2007, from Lloyd Erlick,

I'm sure that is the reason it's stocked on
the shelves of hardware stores large and
small (as a degreaser and cleaning agent). I
buy it in the same waxed two-liter cardboard
packs they use for milk. What a funny world.
I suppose taking it out of the laundry
detergent took most of it out of the lake.

Potassium Phosphate was a bit more difficult
to source locally, but far from impossible. I
had to ride the transit ...

regards,
--le
________________________________
Lloyd Erlick Portraits, Toronto.
website: www.heylloyd.com
telephone: 416-686-0326
email: portrait@heylloyd.com
________________________________
--
Lloyd Erlick - 21 Sep 2007 13:57 GMT
>... is there a warm-tone using just phenidone, sort
>of a POTA for Paper?

September 21, 2007, from Lloyd Erlick,

Phenidone is not an everlasting developing
agent like Metol. I can't possibly keep up
with the degradation of both Glycin and
Phenidone if they're both in my darkroom at
the same time.

I thought Phenidone had the reputation of
yielding cool results?

By the way, a very interesting print
development agent is para amino phenol, as in
Rodinal. It is also interesting to add it to
other print developers. My color perception
sees print results from pAP as quite a 'hard'
brown (not as warm-red as others, but more
enamel-like in appearance).

regards,
--le
________________________________
Lloyd Erlick Portraits, Toronto.
website: www.heylloyd.com
telephone: 416-686-0326
email: portrait@heylloyd.com
________________________________
--
Bogdan Karasek - 21 Sep 2007 21:29 GMT
Hi,

snip

> By the way, a very interesting print
> development agent is para amino phenol, as in
> Rodinal.

As a starting point for experimentation, what dilution of Rodinal did
you use and how much time did it take to get a viable image?

It is also interesting to add it to
> other print developers.

What proportions did you use with what print developers.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Bogdan

________________________________________________________________
  Bogdan Karasek
  Montréal, Québec                     bogdan at bogdanphoto.com
  Canada                               www.bogdanphoto.com

                  "I photograph my reality"
________________________________________________________________
Lloyd Erlick - 22 Sep 2007 10:49 GMT
September 22, 2007, from Lloyd Erlick,

...

>> By the way, a very interesting print
>> development agent is para amino phenol, as in
>> Rodinal.
>
>As a starting point for experimentation, what dilution of Rodinal did
>you use and how much time did it take to get a viable image?

I found that diluting Rodinal (I did this
when it was still an Agfa product) 1+15 --
1+20 yielded very nice prints. A tablespoon
or two of sodium or potassium sulfite will
help it last more than a short time in the
tray.

It performed very much like any paper
developer one might use. I generally use
three minutes development time, and Rodinal
was no different.

>It is also interesting to add it to
>> other print developers.
>
>What proportions did you use with what print developers.
...

I did that when I had a bottle of pAP
developing agent from the Formulary. I found
three to six grams in a liter of working
solution of some other developer (mostly I
did this with the Ansco 120 formula) changed
the look of the result nicely.

Again, it's far from a dramatic, exaggerated
change in performance of the developer. I'm
not making any marketing-speak claims.
Results are subtle and far from obvious. A
darkroom worker must be employed to detect
...

regards,
--le
________________________________
Lloyd Erlick Portraits, Toronto.
website: www.heylloyd.com
telephone: 416-686-0326
email: portrait@heylloyd.com
________________________________
--
Richard Knoppow - 21 Sep 2007 23:16 GMT
>>... is there a warm-tone using just phenidone, sort
>>of a POTA for Paper?
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> regards,
> --le

   Rodinal makes a good although expensive print developer
at about 1:25. A very long time ago Agfa actually advertised
this in Rodinal ads.

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

Lloyd Erlick - 22 Sep 2007 10:52 GMT
>A very long time ago Agfa actually advertised
>this in Rodinal ads.

September 22, 2007, from Lloyd Erlick,

I find myself compelled to scan nearly
everything that crosses my path. If I found
one of these ads I'd certainly make a
screen-filler out of it ...

I think the Formulary still supplies pAP.
It's important to get the HCl form, not the
pure base, which will not dissolve easily (or
at all, frankly). It's a lot cheaper this way
than to buy actual Rodinal.

regards,
--le
Lloyd Erlick - 21 Sep 2007 13:57 GMT
>     An interesting formula. I don't think I've seen another
>print developer with Glycin as the sole developing agent.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>     How active is it? I mean how long is  your developing
>time and does it seem to have any effect on paper speed?

September 21, 2007, from Lloyd Erlick,

It was the only formula I could find with
Glycin as the only developing agent.

I have been using Metol as the sole
developing agent in a print developer for
some time (Ansco 120 formula, with potassium
salts instead of sodium). I've used Glycin in
the past (actually managed to use up a bottle
of it before it spoiled). So when I got the
urge to buy some more Glycin this time, I
thought I should use it alone in a developer
to get a real feel for its action.

I swap the sodium salts in the original
formula for their potassium counterparts.
This yields a noticeably warmer result that I
find very rewarding, as Adams would phrase
it.

It's a relatively low activity developer. I
use a three minute development time. For
about the first forty five seconds there is
close to no density observable. Of course,
it's under dim light, so there probably is
some slight density, but basically for the
first minute the image is barely visible. I
use a lot of black backgrounds in my
portraits, and of course it's the black areas
that appear first. They take roughly a minute
before significant density appears.

Effect on paper speed is hard to say. I've
had a bit of a struggle with some Forte PW-14
Warmtone lately. That paper is definitely
slow (at least double the exposure I give the
same negative on Ilford MGW). I've made no
scientific measurements, but it seems to me
the paper (Ilford MGW) responds very
similarly in my usual 120 Metol and the 102
Glycin formula.

Recently someone remarked that they were
looking for a developer that would yield warm
print results with no need for toner. (This
might have been on the PureSilver list, or
maybe APUG, sure glad all this still exists!)
Anyway, it seems to me there is a bit of
pleasant warm glow of Glycin in the freshly
developed and fixed but not toned print after
development in the Glycin 102 developer. As
I've commented before, my color perception is
not exact (they let me drive cars but not fly
attack helicopters ...), so maybe the prints
are even warmer than I think after
development.

However, the real thing about this developer
is the result of selenium toning on the
print. I know I'm prone to all the usual
psychological effects of color and looking
too much, but I really, really like the
result of ten minutes in KRST that is fairly
concentrated, and maybe even warm, too. Skin
tones have a lovely golden glow, and blonde
hair looks radiant. I wonder if anyone has
made scientific observations of Glycin
results? The lore has it that Glycin gives a
certain 'glow' to print tones, and I have to
admit I think I see that. I'm sure it could
be wishful thinking, but in any case, the
prints are very beautiful.

regards,
--le
________________________________
Lloyd Erlick Portraits, Toronto.
website: www.heylloyd.com
telephone: 416-686-0326
email: portrait@heylloyd.com
________________________________
--
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.