> Unless it's free I'd pass, I have an SCA-400, rarely use it except for
> exposure and timer. I find I print all my color on the computer and all
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>
>> Thanks!
I bought an analyzer a couple years ago-- I find that the best analyzer is
the Kodak viewing filters and a test strip. I can usually get the exposure
and color right with one or two test strips. I cut a sheet of 16x20 into
eight 4x10 test strips.
Although the analyzer is nice for B&W: make one good print, meter a shadow,
null the meter, and print everything else to the same setting.
nathantw - 13 Aug 2007 02:59 GMT
> I bought an analyzer a couple years ago-- I find that the best analyzer is
> the Kodak viewing filters and a test strip. I can usually get the exposure
> and color right with one or two test strips. I cut a sheet of 16x20 into
> eight 4x10 test strips.
I'll be the first to admit that I SUCK at color analyzing, especially when
it came to using the Kodak viewing filters. I went years using the Kodak
viewing filter and also the little color squares that simulates 140 test
strips as it tries to find 18% gray. Both helped in some ways but I was
still wasting paper and chemicals left and right. The only time I finally
got it right was when I got the Colorstar 3000 for $100 on Ebay. It really
is easy once you find the perfect setup.
That said, though, I think the easiest way to get color nowdays though is to
either bring it to Costco and for less than $2 have a "perfect" 8x10 or to
print it with your home inkjet, though that could get just as costly as
having your own color darkroom.