Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / May 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

HIE: D76 or HC-110?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
piterengel - 30 Apr 2007 09:30 GMT
Hi, yesterday I've shot an HIE film with dark red filter on. Subject
was my daughter and a lot of green leaf. So now I've a doubt: to
obtain good portrait pictures is it better to develop HIE in D76 or
HC-110?
Thanks all
P.
Nermal - 30 Apr 2007 23:01 GMT
I never used HIE before but I have processed PanX and TriX (type F
filter) in D76 diluted 1:1 for recommended time and temperature.  The
negatives printed ok on #2 paper.

> Hi, yesterday I've shot an HIE film with dark red filter on. Subject
> was my daughter and a lot of green leaf. So now I've a doubt: to
> obtain good portrait pictures is it better to develop HIE in D76 or
> HC-110?
> Thanks all
> P.
dan.c.quinn@att.net - 30 Apr 2007 23:20 GMT
>On Apr 30, 1:30 am, piterengel <pslavi...@interfree.it> wrote:
> Hi, yesterday I've shot an HIE film with dark red filter on. Subject
> was my daughter and a lot of green leaf. So now I've a doubt: to
> obtain good portrait pictures is it better to develop HIE in D76 or
> HC-110?  Thanks all, P.

The developer does not affect the color balance of the film.
HIE for portraits? Dan
Richard Knoppow - 30 Apr 2007 23:36 GMT
> Hi, yesterday I've shot an HIE film with dark red filter
> on. Subject
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Thanks all
> P.

  I'm not sure what the optimum developer for HIE is. I
hope you are aware of the tonal distortion of IR film. IR
shows the leaves of deciduous plants as very light and
evergreens as very dark and skin is light plus the IR "sees"
below the surface a bit so will bring out veins, etc.
Usually not very flattering. The developer will have little
or no effect on this.

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

Nicholas O. Lindan - 01 May 2007 00:25 GMT
"piterengel" <pslaviero@interfree.it> wrote
> HIE film with dark red filter ... D76 or
> HC-110?

35mm HIE [High Speed Infrared, Kodak] is grainy and
contrasty to begin with and HC110 will only make
matters worse.

D-76 would be a better choice.

Signature

Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Darkroom Automation: F-Stop Timers, Enlarging Meters
http://www.darkroomautomation.com/index.htm
n o lindan at ix dot netcom dot com

piterengel - 01 May 2007 07:16 GMT
> "piterengel" <pslavi...@interfree.it> wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Darkroom Automation: F-Stop Timers, Enlarging Metershttp://www.darkroomautomation.com/index.htm
> n o lindan at ix dot netcom dot com

I think I'm going to follow your tip. Pre-wash for 5 mins in water,
then develop in D76 stock for 8.5 mins. Answering to Dan, I've chosen
HIE for portraits to obtain the typical "snow" effect and surreal
scene, i.e. to make something a little bit different from the usual.
I've took several pictures with Tri-X too, with 6x6 camera, and
colours pictures too....
Thanks all, today I'll develop the film than I'll let you know about
results.
Bye
P.
UC - 14 May 2007 15:37 GMT
> > "piterengel" <pslavi...@interfree.it> wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Bye
> P.

Use HALF the time Kodak recommmends if you doing a portrait.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.