Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Stabilizer in Tetinal C-41 1 ltr. Press Kit

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
millard@alaska.net - 24 Feb 2007 16:34 GMT
I know that this question has been posted previously, however I am not
sure that anyone has offered a fix. When I use the Tetinal C-41 press
kit I get a nasty white residue on my negatives upon drying after I
use the stabilizer. Has anyone out there who has encountered similar
problems found a satisfactory way to resolve this?
Gregory Blank - 24 Feb 2007 17:04 GMT
> I know that this question has been posted previously, however I am not
> sure that anyone has offered a fix. When I use the Tetinal C-41 press
> kit I get a nasty white residue on my negatives upon drying after I
> use the stabilizer. Has anyone out there who has encountered similar
> problems found a satisfactory way to resolve this?

Have you tried mixing the stabilizer with distilled water? Are you
following the directions to the letter otherwise?
Signature

George W. Bush is the President Quayle we never had.

millard@alaska.net - 24 Feb 2007 20:16 GMT
> In article <1172334887.841196.67...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> --
> George W. Bush is the President Quayle we never had.

Yes to both of your questions Greg.
Gregory Blank - 25 Feb 2007 00:16 GMT
> > In article <1172334887.841196.67...@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Yes to both of your questions Greg.

I am going to see if I can help,...I'll get back to you if I can.
Signature

George W. Bush is the President Quayle we never had.

millard@alaska.net - 25 Feb 2007 00:39 GMT
> In article <1172348161.481118.306...@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Hey thanks Greg,

I thought of following the stabilizer bath with a rinse in photoflo
but I am concerned about whether this would have an effect on the
stability of the dyes in the film.

Mark
Gregory Blank - 25 Feb 2007 02:11 GMT
> Hey thanks Greg,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Mark

I doubt it, stabilizer is typically sort of like formalin and photo flo
more or less detergent. Both are used highly dilute.
Signature

George W. Bush is the President Quayle we never had.

Randy Stewart - 25 Feb 2007 18:27 GMT
>> Hey thanks Greg,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I doubt it, stabilizer is typically sort of like formalin and photo flo
> more or less detergent. Both are used highly dilute.

Phoflo won't effect the dyes directly, but it would dilute or wash out the
residual stabilizer, which would diminish or remove its effect.  So,
post-stabilizer rinse, with or w/o photflo, is a bad idea.

Most stabilizers, particularly formalin based ones, dry to a white residue
when in stock or concentrated form.  Just my guess, but could you be using
your stabilizer in an excessive concentration by accident?
millard@alaska.net - 25 Feb 2007 19:27 GMT
> > In article <1172363962.768535.270...@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>,
> > "mill...@alaska.net" <mill...@alaska.net> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> when in stock or concentrated form.  Just my guess, but could you be using
> your stabilizer in an excessive concentration by accident?

Randy,

Thanks for your thoughts on this matter. The Tetinal C-41 press kit
supplys all of its chemistry in solid form. I really have been
wondering about the "stabilizer" that they provide, as I have not
heard of formaldehyde in a solid form. In reviewing my info sheet from
Tetinal, I note that their "stabilizer" contains "aldehyde compound."
I am not sure what that is, but I certainly sounds like a compound
similar to formaldehyde. All of that said, it is pretty difficult to
use at excessive concentration of stabilizer as the powdered chemistry
is mixed to the working strength.

So far, I think that Gregs suggestion of seeing whether a local
photolab can order some stabilizer for me in their next order may be
my best option. In the past I have never had this difficulty when I
have mixed stabilizer from concentrate liquid chemistry.

Mark
Gregory Blank - 25 Feb 2007 19:56 GMT
> Phoflo won't effect the dyes directly, but it would dilute or wash out the
> residual stabilizer, which would diminish or remove its effect.  So,
> post-stabilizer rinse, with or w/o photflo, is a bad idea.

What do you think of adding PF to the stabilizer as the one last step....
interactions?
Signature

George W. Bush is the President Quayle we never had.

millard@alaska.net - 25 Feb 2007 22:39 GMT
> In article <12u3l7ng8h4p...@corp.supernews.com>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> --
> George W. Bush is the President Quayle we never had.

Well I am not sure. I am tempted to because I really cant print
through the spotting that I get however, I really don't want my
negatives to fade. I may do that until I can obtain a different brand
of stabilizer which hopefully will not give me the same difficulty.
Gregory Blank - 26 Feb 2007 01:09 GMT
> Well I am not sure. I am tempted to because I really cant print
> through the spotting that I get however, I really don't want my
> negatives to fade. I may do that until I can obtain a different brand
> of stabilizer which hopefully will not give me the same difficulty.

Actually my question wasn't directed to you, however I'll check with
Tetenal  from my work tomorrow. I work for the US distributer so perhaps
I'll get a more expedient answer.

Take care.
Signature

George W. Bush is the President Quayle we never had.

millard@alaska.net - 26 Feb 2007 02:03 GMT
> In article <1172443155.170314.247...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> --
> George W. Bush is the President Quayle we never had.

Thanks Greg,

If he can shed some light on this it would be appreciated.

Mark

p.s. Not only is "W" the President Quayle we never had...He is also
the Quayle we never wanted!
Gregory Blank - 26 Feb 2007 03:12 GMT

> p.s. Not only is "W" the President Quayle we never had...He is also
> the Quayle we never wanted!

Quayle are quite tasty if you roast them correctly (on a mesquite
spit)........bacon threaded through them helps.....ah and don't forget
some blue cheese peppercorn dressing :)
Signature

George W. Bush is the President Quayle we never had.

millard@alaska.net - 26 Feb 2007 04:03 GMT
> In article <1172455384.809851.52...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> --
> George W. Bush is the President Quayle we never had.

Greg,

On a similar note:  http://www.weeklyradioaddress.com/WRA20060218.htm

Mark
Gregory Blank - 26 Feb 2007 23:28 GMT
> > In article <1172455384.809851.52...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Mark

LOL.
Signature

George W. Bush is the President Quayle we never had.

Rod Smith - 25 Feb 2007 07:10 GMT
> I thought of following the stabilizer bath with a rinse in photoflo
> but I am concerned about whether this would have an effect on the
> stability of the dyes in the film.

I've seen warnings from a retired Kodak scientist to not rinse color film
after it's been through the stabilizer (even after it's dried); apparently
the stabilizer takes some time to act fully, and rinsing the film will
wash away the trace amounts that remain behind after the film dries. I'd
imagine that Photo Flo would count as a rinse in this context, so I
wouldn't do it.

For your main problem, though, I have two comments:

1) Most modern C-41 films don't require the old-style stabilizer; instead,
  they require a new "final rinse" product. Details of what works with
  what seem thin on the ground, but as far as I can tell, stabilizer is
  good to use with old or new films but final rinse should only be used
  with new films. OTOH, stabilizer contains formaldehyde, so you should
  exercise more care in its use.

2) Unless you've got a reason to favor the stabilizer provided by Tetenal,
  you might want to consider picking up some Kodak or Fuji stabilizer (or
  final rinse if you're using exclusively newer Kodak and Fuji films) to
  use instead of the Tetenal product. Adorama (http://www.adorama.com)
  has it and will ship it. (I'm not sure about shipping to Alaska,
  though; if your e-mail address is any indication that could be an
  issue.) You could also check with some local 1-hour labs and see if
  they'll add some stabilizer to their next order of chemicals for you.

Signature

Rod Smith, rodsmith@rodsbooks.com
http://www.rodsbooks.com
Author of books on Linux, FreeBSD, and networking

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.