Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is Google Paying Attention

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
dan.c.quinn@att.net - 26 Jan 2007 01:48 GMT
I don't like the new layout and it's buggy.
And why is all that junk allowed? Dan
David Nebenzahl - 26 Jan 2007 03:38 GMT
dan.c.quinn@att.net spake thus:

> I don't like the new layout and it's buggy.
> And why is all that junk allowed? Dan

Try using a real news client. Still nothing better than good ol' Usenet,
using a text-based system like [insert name of diety here] intended.

Signature

Just as McDonald's is where you go when you're hungry but don't really
care about the quality of your food, Wikipedia is where you go when
you're curious but don't really care about the quality of your knowledge.

- Matthew White's WikiWatch (http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/wikiwoo.htm)

John - 26 Jan 2007 18:26 GMT
>dan.c.quinn@att.net spake thus:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Try using a real news client. Still nothing better than good ol' Usenet,
>using a text-based system like [insert name of diety here] intended.
                                                     /\/\/\/\/\/\
                                                     AGENT 4.1

==
    John S. Douglas
    Photographer & Webmaster
    Legacy-photo.com - Xs750.net
dan.c.quinn@att.net - 26 Jan 2007 22:49 GMT
RE: On Jan 25, 7:38 pm, David Nebenzahl <nob...@but.us.chickens>
wrote:

> dan.c.qu...@att.net spake thus:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> DanTry using a real news client. Still nothing better than good ol' Usenet,
> using a text-based system like [insert name of diety here] intended.

 Yes But. I'm looking at Google Groups, rec.photo.darkroom.
It looks BAD with all that Junk. Google should have skipped the
new format and spent the time working to block the Junk.
This and other Groups ARE members only? Dan
Richard Knoppow - 05 Feb 2007 22:55 GMT
>I don't like the new layout and it's buggy.
> And why is all that junk allowed? Dan

    I also use Google Groups to check Usenet when not at
home. The new format is awful but workable once you get used
to it. For instance, the sign in for Google members shows up
at the far upper right corner so its easy to miss. Also, the
frequently visited groups now show up as a pull-down menu.
    I am not sure what you are calling junk. I use Firefox
which allows blocking images so I am able to eliminate some
advertising on some sites. I also do not have Flashplayer on
the computer I use. While it has some legitimate uses it
seems most of the Flash stuff is animated advertising which
I find very distracting and annoying.
    Google is still useful where one must access news
groups on a machine which has access to the web but not to a
news server.

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Matt Clara - 09 Feb 2007 00:49 GMT
>>I don't like the new layout and it's buggy.
>> And why is all that junk allowed? Dan
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>     Google is still useful where one must access news groups on a machine
> which has access to the web but not to a news server.

How do you View As Tree in the new google groups?  I can't tell who's
replying to whom...most annoying.
Claudio Bonavolta - 09 Feb 2007 08:49 GMT
> How do you View As Tree in the new google groups?  I can't tell who's
> replying to whom...most annoying.

Once you selected a thread, click on "More Options" (upper right side
of the window) then on "Show Message List" (upper left side of the
window).
To remove the arborescence, just do the opposite ("Hide Message List"
and "Hide Options") ...

Claudio Bonavolta
http://www.bonavolta.ch
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.