Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Signatures

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Knight of Starlight - 14 Jan 2007 04:14 GMT
How do you sign your photographs when exhibiting them?  Some
photographers sign the mat, others sign the print.

Which way is better?
Nicholas O. Lindan - 14 Jan 2007 06:06 GMT
"Knight of Starlight" <knight-of-starlight@webtv.net> wrote.

> How do you sign your photographs when exhibiting them?  Some
> photographers sign the mat, others sign the print.

I sign the print, the mount board or the mat.  It depends on
how I am mounting and matting the print and my mood that day.

I sign the print if it is loose or attached to the mat
board with rice paper or some other removable attachment.
The problem is when I make a blob of ink on the print.

I sign the mount board in pencil if the print is heat/resin
mounted to the board, except when I sign the print just
because I feel like it.

I sign the print if I leave a wide white border around it;
I sign on the white border just below the image.

I sign the mat board if the mat overlays the print: i.e., a
quick and dirty mounting.

I use pencil to sign the mount or the mat and India in
a rapidograph to sign the print.  I now use one of the
disposable archival rapidographs from the art store.

> Which way is better?

The way that you feel best about?

Signature

Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Darkroom Automation: F-Stop Timers, Enlarging Meters
http://www.nolindan.com/da/index.htm
n o lindan at ix dot netcom dot com

Gregory Blank - 14 Jan 2007 13:08 GMT
> How do you sign your photographs when exhibiting them?  Some
> photographers sign the mat, others sign the print.
>
> Which way is better?

One thing that is NOT a good idea, and some people do it, they sign on
the image area. With any type pen, ink etc.- including those gaudy
silver-gold photo pens.

My experience is a consistent approach is best, people (buyers) like to
see an established pattern-even if that means several different ways of
signing for differing products (i.e: mounted versus loose prints).

Personally I never sign over mats, only the base mat the print is
fastened to. If I sell a loose print, I sign the front on the border
area with something like "archival ink" and the back of the print in
pencil for fiber base prints.
Signature

George W. Bush is the President Quayle we never had.

JJ - 15 Jan 2007 14:25 GMT
> How do you sign your photographs when exhibiting them?  Some
> photographers sign the mat, others sign the print.

I sign Greg Blank's name in gold ink on the emulsion.
footermatt@gmail.com - 08 Feb 2007 07:32 GMT
On Jan 13, 8:14 pm, knight-of-starli...@webtv.net (Knight of
Starlight) wrote:
> How do you sign your photographs when exhibiting them?  Some
> photographers sign the mat, others sign the print.
>
> Which way is better?

I sign the back of the print with a N0 pencil (soft so I don't need to
apply much pressure to leave a dark mark) and the front of the overmat
with a 6H pencil (hard so it doesn't leave much lead and can only be
seen if you're looking for it).

Works for me, might not work for you.

Matt
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.