Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

RC vs Fibre Imagination

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Alan Smithee - 11 Jan 2007 17:10 GMT
I don't have a lot of experience with fibre paper. I've just started
printing on some recently. Visually it looks less grainy than RC. Am I
imagining things?
Nicholas O. Lindan - 11 Jan 2007 19:32 GMT
> I don't have a lot of experience with fibre paper. I've just started
> printing on some recently. Visually it looks less grainy than RC. Am I
> imagining things?

No. Not only is it less grainy, it lowers your blood pressure,
gives you a big boost of energy, increases your sex appeal and
raises your salary.

Fibre based, if not ferrotyped, hides a bit of the grain in
the paper texture.  The more texture, the more grain hiding.

When ferrotyped the grain reappears; to my mind the grain shown
in ferrotypeded FB is a nicer - sharper, more even - than what
pops up with the same negative on glossy RC.

Take this with a grain of salt as I think RC paper is a work of
the Devil; OTOH, the Devil easier to dance with. Throw the
salt over your left shoulder.

Signature

Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Darkroom Automation: F-Stop Timers, Enlarging Meters
http://www.nolindan.com/da/index.htm
n o lindan at ix dot netcom dot com

Alan Smithee - 11 Jan 2007 21:56 GMT
> > I don't have a lot of experience with fibre paper. I've just started
> > printing on some recently. Visually it looks less grainy than RC. Am I
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> gives you a big boost of energy, increases your sex appeal and
> raises your salary.

I can't believe it does all those things...and I don't get sp*m telling me
so. ;^)
dan.c.quinn@att.net - 11 Jan 2007 23:47 GMT
> I don't have a lot of experience with fibre paper. I've just started
> printing on some recently. Visually it looks less grainy than RC.
> Am I imagining things?

 Perhaps not. But it's not the paper it's your focusing of the
negative. Any grain you see in a print is from your negative. The
entire matter is some what complex. It envolves the blue to green
band width sensitivity of the two emulsions. They may vary
considerably and so too the focus. What you see when
you focus may not be what you get.

But, if both papers are Graded none of the above applies.
The narrow blue band for which Graded papers are sensitive
and which allows for a high level of darkroom lighting, is common
to all Graded papers. Dan
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.