>If memory serves, that's how Technicolor film cameras work, a beam
>splitter and filters expose 3 B&W films simultaneously.
Looks that way:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technicolor
> >>> Pudentame a écrit :
> >>>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> If memory serves, that's how Technicolor film cameras work, a beam
> splitter and filters expose 3 B&W films simultaneously.
John -- technicolor was a process used for most early
color motion picture films through the 1950s, when the
expense was deemed too great and dye color films began
to be used. I don't know if color separations were ever
used for still imaging other than dye transfer. Gone
With The Wind and The Wizard of Oz, if I remember
correctly, are among the first examples of techicolor
motion picture photography. It's demise is a sad loss
to motion picture films (if anyone doubts this see
Lawerence of Arabia on DVD.)
In any case I was required in college to produce a
tricolor separation image using three b&w separation
exposures. The color is unmatched IMO.
However, tricolor photography was first developed by
James Clerk Maxwell in 1861, not Tauleigne or Gorskii,
based on a early 1800s theory by Thomas Young (who
also produce the first ever nonextant photograph in
1802)as well as Herman Helmholtz, that all colors could
be reproduced using additive primary RGB or complimentary
subtractive colors (Yellow, Magenta, Cyan.)
In 1861, Maxwell produced the first ever color separation
color image using three projected lantern slides called
Tartan Ribbon (a color separation image of a ribbon.)
darkroommike - 19 Jan 2007 15:00 GMT
A lot of advertising photography was once done with
separation cameras, one type was called a one-shot since the
image was created on three sheets of film with one shot.
I recall reading about it in an early photography annual.
Petersons' Photography once published plans for a drop
shutter with three windows using different filters so you
could do a tri-color shot on one pie
ce of film--interest for clouds, waterfalls and other moving
objects.
darkroommike
>>>>> Pudentame a écrit :
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> color image using three projected lantern slides called
> Tartan Ribbon (a color separation image of a ribbon.)
JJ - 22 Jan 2007 14:49 GMT
> A lot of advertising photography was once done with separation cameras,
> one type was called a one-shot since the image was created on three
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> a tri-color shot on one pie
> ce of film--interest for clouds, waterfalls and other moving objects.
I remember that contraption, but it wasn't intended to produce
separations. It was strictly a special effects thing. It was a vertical
drop shutter that passed an array of filters across the lens.
I can remember something I read fifty years ago but not what I had for
lunch yesterday.
ellis@no.spam - 19 Jan 2007 17:12 GMT
>John -- technicolor was a process used for most early color
>motion picture films through the 1950s, when the expense was
>deemed too great and dye color films began to be used.
Better film speed was a factor too. Technicolor was very slow
and required an obnoxious amount of light.
Pudentame - 20 Jan 2007 18:52 GMT
>>>>> Pudentame a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> This looks like the technique that Russian guy developed for taking 3
>>>>>> images sequentially using R,G,B (or was it CMY) filters.
> In any case I was required in college to produce a
> tricolor separation image using three b&w separation
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> color image using three projected lantern slides called
> Tartan Ribbon (a color separation image of a ribbon.)
Perhaps I wasn't clear. I make no claim the Russian guy invented color
photography, only that the images referred to in the original post
reminded me of the images he produced.
Tom Phillips - 21 Jan 2007 08:31 GMT
Well, your post said "looks like the technique that russian
guy developed..."
Course I was already very familiar with Gorskii and had
high appreciation of his work! But in fact James Clerk
Maxwell developed tricolor photography based on Thomas
Young's [very] early theories. Cheers...
> >>>>> Pudentame a écrit :
> >>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> photography, only that the images referred to in the original post
> reminded me of the images he produced.