Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Printing from Negative Film Vs. from Positive Film

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
tigresdelrio@gmail.com - 09 Oct 2006 09:12 GMT
Is the process of printing from a negative similar to, or exactly the
same as, printing from a positive?

Thanks.
UC - 09 Oct 2006 14:01 GMT
> Is the process of printing from a negative similar to, or exactly the
> same as, printing from a positive?
>
> Thanks.

Yes and no.
Claudio Bonavolta - 09 Oct 2006 14:17 GMT
tigresdelrio@gmail.com a écrit :

> Is the process of printing from a negative similar to, or exactly the
> same as, printing from a positive?
>
> Thanks.

They are similar in that you expose a surface and develop it but the
type of surface and development differ.

Positive processes are rare now as I don't think there are any
commercial for B/W (it's possible to use DIY formulas) and, in color,
only Ilfochrome remains (all manufacturers have abandoned concurrent
R-3 processes).

You should precise somewhat better what kind of information you're
looking for.

Claudio Bonavolta
http://www.bonavolta.ch
beer - 09 Oct 2006 20:29 GMT
Claudio Bonavolta ha escrito:

> They are similar in that you expose a surface and develop it but the
> type of surface and development differ.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Claudio Bonavolta
> http://www.bonavolta.ch
hi claudio
i develop my slide with jobo system but the i have more difficult to
buy  ilfochrome product.
i'd like to buy  focomat v35 as enlarger for printing in cibachrome
but, in italy , i do not find every ilforchrom supplier so the positive
process is, for me , like a chimera.
cheers,
Emilio.
Claudio Bonavolta - 10 Oct 2006 10:02 GMT
beer a écrit :

> Claudio Bonavolta ha escrito:
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> cheers,
> Emilio.

Hi Emilio,

I know Ilfochrome distribution is still chaotic in Italy,
unfortunately, I don't know who is the official distributor.
If you're close to Switzerland, then you can order here from any shop
(provided they want to). If not, try to go through mail-order or
websites that sell it.
There should be some in Europe (Germany or France):
-
http://www.nordfoto.de/shops/amateur_chemikalien_e_6_fuer_farbdiafilm.html
- http://www.nightlight.fr/COULEUR.HTM
- http://www.prophot.fr/rev/prophot?page=liste&groupe=3&famille=233
- http://www.prophot.fr/rev/prophot?page=liste&groupe=2&famille=208
Just a few addresses quickly found via Google, you may find cheaper
prices in searching better than I did.
Ordering from the US may be problematic due to the air restrictions for
chemicals and shipment cost may be prohibitive. You can check with big
shops like B&H (http://www.bhphotovideo.com).
I prefer the CLM.1K surface which has the typical high-gloss surface
and a medium contrast usable with moderate burn and dodge.
Note there is a new chemicals kit P3.5 which is a 5 liters kit splitted
in 1-liter internal packages. P-30 kits now means old chemicals ...

Regarding the V35, it's a fine enlarger for Ilfochrome, but check it is
in good shape with the genuine Focotar lens. I see regularly strange
things on sale on eBay ...
Its only drawback is its limitation to the 35mm format.

Un salutone,
Claudio Bonavolta
http://www.bonavolta.ch
tigresdelrio@gmail.com - 09 Oct 2006 20:42 GMT
> Positive processes are rare now as I don't think there are any
> commercial for B/W (it's possible to use DIY formulas) and, in color,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> You should precise somewhat better what kind of information you're
> looking for.

I apologize for I am a novice, and I am looking to learn more about
photography, in general.

But, in regards to my question about printing positive vs. negative
film, I am looking for more information about producing a print from
positive film.  I have knowledge of how to produce a print from
negative film -- using the enlarger, putting the paper in the baths of
chemicals, etc.

Is this the same process in producing a print from positive film --
just with different chemicals?  This answer may seem obvious to some of
you, but I am learning by myself, and any insights are helpful and
useful to me.

Thank you.
P.S.  What is the R-3 process?  Do any of you have informational
photography websites I could peruse?
UC - 09 Oct 2006 20:53 GMT
> > Positive processes are rare now as I don't think there are any
> > commercial for B/W (it's possible to use DIY formulas) and, in color,
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> negative film -- using the enlarger, putting the paper in the baths of
> chemicals, etc.

> Is this the same process in producing a print from positive film --
> just with different chemicals?

No, it isn't, and yes, it is.

> This answer may seem obvious to some of
> you, but I am learning by myself, and any insights are helpful and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> P.S.  What is the R-3 process?  Do any of you have informational
> photography websites I could peruse?
Alfred T B - 10 Oct 2006 00:32 GMT
>> > Positive processes are rare now as I don't think there are any
>> > commercial for B/W (it's possible to use DIY formulas) and, in color,
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> No, it isn't, and yes, it is.

How is it the same and where does it differ?
syncopator@gmail.com - 10 Oct 2006 06:48 GMT
> > No, it isn't, and yes, it is.
> >
> How is it the same and where does it differ?

Google for Ilfochrome and Cibachrome.  Here's a site with a description
of some of what's involved:

http://www.lightroom.com/lr_pages/ilfo_info.html

I looked into it myself some time ago.  Like processing color prints
from negatives it takes temperature stabilized chemicals, but with
Ilfochrome/Cibachrome it takes one extra bath-- so if you, for example,
want to use a Nova slot processor you'll want to get the one with 4
slots instead of the usual 3.  Or if you use a Jobo tube system you'll
do an extra chemistry step.  It's probably possible to set up an
automated processor to do it as well, if you got the $$$ but again,
you'd have to find one with the requisite chemistry sections.  Then you
must hope that Ilfo won't discontinue the materials.

The local Jr. College recently updated their darkroom and
unfortunately, ripped out their Cibachrome lab-- just as I started
taking some color classes there.  Quite dissapointing as I wanted to
get my hands wet with it a bit to see exactly what I would be in for if
I were to try it in my home darkroom.  There's probably folks on this
newsgroup that have done it before though, if you can get their
attention.

--

Sync
Claudio Bonavolta - 10 Oct 2006 10:17 GMT
tigresdelrio@gmail.com a écrit :

> > Positive processes are rare now as I don't think there are any
> > commercial for B/W (it's possible to use DIY formulas) and, in color,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I apologize for I am a novice, and I am looking to learn more about
> photography, in general.

No problem, we all started one day ...

> But, in regards to my question about printing positive vs. negative
> film, I am looking for more information about producing a print from
> positive film.  I have knowledge of how to produce a print from
> negative film -- using the enlarger, putting the paper in the baths of
> chemicals, etc.

I suppose you're talking B/W ?
Basically, there are an inversion and re-development additional steps.
I have a page on B/W slides that describes the general idea:
http://www.bonavolta.ch/hobby/en/photo/slidesbw.htm

One difficulty with positive slides is that they have a pretty high
contrast.
An usual B/W negative is pretty low in contrast, so the relative paper
to print on should have a higher contrast to compensate.
Your positive being high in contrast, using a paper having a high
contrast too may give an excessive resulting contrast.
To reduce the general contrast, you must use a very soft developer with
low grades. Maybe it is enough to obtain a correct result. I can't tell
you for sure as I've never tried it.

Positive papers like Ilfochrome and their relative process have a
natural low contrast to compensate the high contrast in the slide. When
you hear that Ilfochrome gives to contrasty prints, it is the
combination of the slide + the print that is still to contrasty.

> Is this the same process in producing a print from positive film --
> just with different chemicals?  This answer may seem obvious to some of
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> P.S.  What is the R-3 process?  Do any of you have informational
> photography websites I could peruse?

R-3 is a color positive process for prints that is (well, was)
concurrent to Ilfochrome and meant to print color slides on paper.
Contrary to Ilfochrome, it was a chromogenic process where the dyes
were build up during the process, like in classic negative color paper
(RA-4 process).
Ilfochrome does contain all the dyes in the manufactured paper, the
process selectively bleaches the "excessive" colors.
I think (but maybe I'm wrong) all manufacturers have stopped their
production of R-3 papers and chemicals.

Claudio Bonavolta
http://www.bonavolta.ch
Rod Smith - 11 Oct 2006 03:30 GMT
> But, in regards to my question about printing positive vs. negative
> film, I am looking for more information about producing a print from
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> you, but I am learning by myself, and any insights are helpful and
> useful to me.

It's the same in broad strokes, but the details differ. One important
difference is that increasing exposure makes a print from a negative
darker, whereas it makes a print from a positive lighter. (Assuming you're
processing to get a normal print, not a reverse-image print.) If you're
talking about color prints, the effects of the filters will be reversed,
too. For instance, increasing cyan filtration when making a color print
from a negative makes the print more red (less cyan), but when making a
print from a slide, increasing cyan filtration makes the print less red
(more cyan).

> P.S.  What is the R-3 process?  Do any of you have informational
> photography websites I could peruse?

Don't worry too much about R-3; the paper and chemicals are no longer
being manufactured, AFAIK. If you stumble across a stash of them, and if
it's all still in date, you might be interested in buying it; but you're
unlikely to find the stuff new in stores. I wouldn't recommend investing
time in learning about R-3 unless it's just to satisfy your curiosity or
if you find a bunch of R-3 supplies cheap. For making color prints from
color slides, the only official process left is Ilfochrome (formerly known
as Cibachrome).

FWIW, although Ilfochrome is the only remaining "official" process for
making prints from color slides, it's possible to make color prints from
slides using conventional RA-4 paper. The process is to expose the paper,
develop it in a conventional *B&W* developer (such as Dektol), put it in a
stop bath, rinse the print, expose the print to light to fog it, and then
proceed with the usual RA-4 process. The result isn't likely to match an
Ilfochrome (or R-3, if you have some R-3 paper and chemicals) print for
color accuracy and contrast, but you might want to play with the process.
The print is likely to be high in contrast and some of the colors may be
odd. The effect can be interesting for some shots.

Signature

Rod Smith, rodsmith@rodsbooks.com
http://www.rodsbooks.com
Author of books on Linux, FreeBSD, and networking

Greg "_" - 12 Oct 2006 02:14 GMT

> FWIW, although Ilfochrome is the only remaining "official" process for
> making prints from color slides, it's possible to make color prints from
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> The print is likely to be high in contrast and some of the colors may be
> odd. The effect can be interesting for some shots.

I actually learned something here today. Thank you.
Signature

Reality-Is finding that perfect picture
and never looking back.

www.gregblankphoto.com

Tom Phillips - 12 Oct 2006 02:48 GMT
Greg \"_\" wrote:

> > FWIW, although Ilfochrome is the only remaining "official" process for
> > making prints from color slides, it's possible to make color prints from
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> I actually learned something here today. Thank you.

Careful. You'll start a trend, and then where
would r.p.d be? Everyone exchanging mutual
knowledge and actually learning something... ;^)
Greg "_" - 12 Oct 2006 03:11 GMT
> Greg \"_\" wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> would r.p.d be? Everyone exchanging mutual
> knowledge and actually learning something... ;^)

This is one of the best rec photo groups, maybe because long ago
I filtered the crack pots out.
Signature

Reality-Is finding that perfect picture
and never looking back.

www.gregblankphoto.com

Tom Phillips - 12 Oct 2006 03:38 GMT
Greg \"_\" wrote:

> > Greg \"_\" wrote:
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> This is one of the best rec photo groups, maybe because long ago
> I filtered the crack pots out.

Crackpots, or crack heads. Sometimes I wonder :)
Lloyd Erlick - 12 Oct 2006 14:02 GMT
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:20:22 -0400, "Greg
\"_\"" <grey_egg@greg_photo.com> wrote:

>This is one of the best rec photo groups, maybe because long ago
>I filtered the crack pots out.

October 12, 2006, from Lloyd Erlick,

That's no doubt true, but I think in reality
the crackpot factor in this ng is fairly low.
We get pretty bugged by it when it appears,
though, no doubt about that, but still, it's
minor.

For a more entertaining crackpot view, check
in on tor.general, supposedly a
Toronto-centric newsgroup. Plenty of
political, racist and personal invective,
enough for all.

regards,
--le
________________________________
Lloyd Erlick Portraits, Toronto.
website: www.heylloyd.com
telephone: 416-686-0326
email: portrait@heylloyd.com
________________________________
--
Greg "_" - 12 Oct 2006 23:37 GMT
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:20:22 -0400, "Greg
> \"_\"" <grey_egg@greg_photo.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> email: portrait@heylloyd.com
> ________________________________

True I was mostly referring to the foul language users. I have most of
the most basic stuff filtered from ever appearing.
Signature

Reality-Is finding that perfect picture
and never looking back.

www.gregblankphoto.com

Tom Phillips - 13 Oct 2006 02:22 GMT
Greg \"_\" wrote:

> > On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:20:22 -0400, "Greg
> > \"_\"" <grey_egg@greg_photo.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> True I was mostly referring to the foul language users. I have most of
> the most basic stuff filtered from ever appearing.

Plus usually they seem to have the least substance
to contribute. Such as (just catching up on my nsg
reading here...)

> What is formalin used for in a darkroom. Found a bottle of it.
> Does it have any use in black and white photography?

I don't know; can you use it to kill yourself if your prints turn out
shitty?
Greg "_" - 13 Oct 2006 04:44 GMT
> > What is formalin used for in a darkroom. Found a bottle of it.
> > Does it have any use in black and white photography?
>
> I don't know; can you use it to kill yourself if your prints turn out
> shitty?

I don't know I 'd say there are quite few better darkroom chemistries
to off one self. Isn't there a reason Amidol comes in a skull and cross
bone package???  Maybe get some mercury and take a stab at fulminating
it onto mirror glass :)
Signature

Reality-Is finding that perfect picture
and never looking back.

www.gregblankphoto.com

Tom Phillips - 13 Oct 2006 08:06 GMT
Greg \"_\" wrote:

> > > What is formalin used for in a darkroom. Found a bottle of it.
> > > Does it have any use in black and white photography?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> bone package???  Maybe get some mercury and take a stab at fulminating
> it onto mirror glass :)

Think I'd rather stand on a mountain top
waiting for lightning to strike. I'd live
longer ;)

The above, of course, is from Nebenzahl
(sig = "Save the Planet, Kill Yourself.")
Typical...
David Nebenzahl - 13 Oct 2006 17:03 GMT
Tom Phillips spake thus:

> Greg \"_\" wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> (sig = "Save the Planet, Kill Yourself.")
> Typical...

Careful, Tom; your puzzling obsession with me is showing.

But you and Greg just continue your w.nker's conversation.

Signature

Save the Planet
Kill Yourself

- motto of the Church of Euthanasia (http://www.churchofeuthanasia.org/)

Tom Phillips - 14 Oct 2006 00:38 GMT
> Careful, Tom; your puzzling obsession with me is showing.

spoken like a true troll
Raphael Bustin - 16 Oct 2006 04:57 GMT
>But you and Greg just continue your w.nker's conversation.

Indeed, it's time for the two of them to get a room.

rafe b
www.terrapinphoto.com
Tom Phillips - 16 Oct 2006 07:31 GMT
> >But you and Greg just continue your w.nker's conversation.
>
> Indeed, it's time for the two of them to get a room.
>
> rafe b
> www.terrapinphoto.com

This from a guy knows so little about photography
his best posts/replies to this nsg are ad hominems...
Greg "_" - 16 Oct 2006 12:44 GMT
You missed the best part, his choice of friends: (Kill filed) Trolls.
Signature

Reality-Is finding that perfect picture
and never looking back.

www.gregblankphoto.com

Greg "_" - 16 Oct 2006 12:44 GMT
> Indeed, it's time for the two of them to get a room.

Coming from you that's hilarious. Thanks going into monday-LOL
Signature

Reality-Is finding that perfect picture
and never looking back.

www.gregblankphoto.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.