with a sub-$500.00 scanner that is. i have heard things about the epson
4990, canon 9950, and a minolta too. i need decent results. i know drum
scanning is the best way, but does anyone get respectable (examples???)
results?
thanks....
mattclara@gmail.com - 21 Sep 2006 13:08 GMT
> with a sub-$500.00 scanner that is. i have heard things about the epson
> 4990, canon 9950, and a minolta too. i need decent results. i know drum
> scanning is the best way, but does anyone get respectable (examples???)
> results?
>
> thanks....
I've been impressed by the 4990 and 4x5.
Here's the whole frame:
http://www.mattclara.com/misc/4990_01.html
And here's a crop, actual size (2 MB):
http://www.mattclara.com/misc/4990_02.html
--
Regards,
Matt Clara
www.mattclara.com
Draco - 21 Sep 2006 14:24 GMT
> I've been impressed by the 4990 and 4x5.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> And here's a crop, actual size (2 MB):
> http://www.mattclara.com/misc/4990_02.html
Nice Matt. Can even see the dust.
Draco
Getting even isn't good enough.
joe mama - 22 Sep 2006 00:58 GMT
> I've been impressed by the 4990 and 4x5.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Matt Clara
> www.mattclara.com
thanks, i can see that it is capable. not perfect, but more than decent fo
some PS work. thanks again.
rafe b - 22 Sep 2006 16:27 GMT
> with a sub-$500.00 scanner that is. i have heard things about the epson
> 4990, canon 9950, and a minolta too. i need decent results. i know drum
> scanning is the best way, but does anyone get respectable (examples???)
> results?
Yes. I've used a Microtek (Artixscan) 2500 and presently
an Epson 4990. The Microtek was sharper, but had other
issues and I no longer own it. The Epson, as far as I can tell,
delivers an "honest" 2000 dpi or so.
I scan my 4x5 stuff at 2400 spi on the Epson. That gives me
110 million pixels, and from that I can make 24x30" prints
that are tack-sharp, corner-to-corner.
"Respectable" is in the eye of the beholder.
rafe b
www.terrapinphoto.com
joe mama - 23 Sep 2006 01:57 GMT
> "Respectable" is in the eye of the beholder.
or "spectacles" ;=) thanks