Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / April 2006
Anti-Newtonion glass for 4x5
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Bogdan Karasek - 09 Apr 2006 21:40 GMT Hello,
I have a Omega DIIv and want to change the original 2 glass plates on the 4x5 negative holder. I haven't used it because both pieces of glass which scratch marks on them; instead I use a glassless 4x5 holder. I was told that I should install Anti-Newtonian glass. What is the difference between regular glass and Anti_Newtonian glass? Unclear on the concept...
If there is a significant difference, I would like to replace them with Anti-Newtonian glass. Is there still a source for this glass, cut to proper size? Thanks.
Regards, Bogdan
 Signature __________________________________________________________________ Bogdan Karasek Montréal, Québec e-mail: bkarasek@videotron.ca Canada
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen" "What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence" Ludwig Wittgenstein ________________________________________________________________
Greg - 09 Apr 2006 22:09 GMT > Hello, > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Regards, > Bogdan You can or probably could get the glass through any good glass supplier, but would need to be cut to specified size if its and old carrier. There are lots of variations on our Omega carriers-so the new configuration may not apply to yours.
The idea behind AN glass is that the glass has a slight texture- a series of ridges that hold the negative away from the glass surface thereby preventing two smooth surfaces and eliminating the concentric Newton rings.
The glass is used on the topside only of the carrier because if placed on the bottom side as well will print the pattern of the ridges onto the photo paper it will also produce a fuzzy image.
 Signature Carry me caravan take me away, take me to Portugal take me to Spain,Andalucia with fields full grain. I have to see you again and again. www.gregblankphoto.com
Thor Lancelot Simon - 09 Apr 2006 22:28 GMT >The glass is used on the topside only of the carrier because if placed >on the bottom side as well will print the pattern of the ridges onto >the photo paper it will also produce a fuzzy image. Actually, the best solution I've found is to use anti-newton glass -- available from frame shops as "anti-glare" or "no-glare" glass; it is acid-etched to have a very very slight stippling -- above the negative, and coated glass, also available from frame shops, under it. If you are doing color work you will want to get the fancy low-iron coated glass for best results, and perhaps use it both above and below the negative.
Frame shops often sell the "Denglas" brand of coated glass. A large shop can probably even seam the edges of this for you after cutting it to size so that you do not risk cutting your fingers when you install it in the carrier or remove it for cleaning.
 Signature Thor Lancelot Simon tls@rek.tjls.com
"We cannot usually in social life pursue a single value or a single moral aim, untroubled by the need to compromise with others." - H.L.A. Hart
David Nebenzahl - 09 Apr 2006 23:09 GMT Thor Lancelot Simon spake thus:
> Frame shops often sell the "Denglas" brand of coated glass. A large > shop can probably even seam the edges of this for you after cutting it > to size so that you do not risk cutting your fingers when you install > it in the carrier or remove it for cleaning. In the neverending advocacy campaign for DIY, this is trivially easy for anyone to do at home with a piece of 600-grit wet-or-dry silicon carbide paper and water.
 Signature Save the Planet Kill Yourself
- motto of the Church of Euthanasia (http://www.churchofeuthanasia.org/)
Thor Lancelot Simon - 10 Apr 2006 00:02 GMT >Thor Lancelot Simon spake thus: > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >anyone to do at home with a piece of 600-grit wet-or-dry silicon carbide >paper and water. Sure, you can edge glass yourself. However, you're going to have to deal with a frame shop to get the coated glass in the first place, unless you're buying a huge quanitity or want to pay Edmund Optics style prices; so you might as well pick a frame shop that has an edge seamer, and then you don't have to do any sanding; they can just make the edge safe for you when they cut it.
 Signature Thor Lancelot Simon tls@rek.tjls.com
"We cannot usually in social life pursue a single value or a single moral aim, untroubled by the need to compromise with others." - H.L.A. Hart
Greg - 10 Apr 2006 01:05 GMT > >The glass is used on the topside only of the carrier because if placed > >on the bottom side as well will print the pattern of the ridges onto [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > to size so that you do not risk cutting your fingers when you install > it in the carrier or remove it for cleaning. Its a good solution-you give. Noting however: "coated" does not equate to Ant newton,.....but still a good idea never the less for the bottom.
 Signature Carry me caravan take me away, take me to Portugal take me to Spain,Andalucia with fields full grain. I have to see you again and again. www.gregblankphoto.com
Bogdan Karasek - 10 Apr 2006 04:25 GMT HI,
I just want to thank all the people who responded. Some very interesting comments and information. Didn't know that you only put an AN on the top and regular good quality glass on the bottom. I've been shooting 4x5 on and off for the past few years, mostly do 120 and 35, but as I go on, I'm drawn to the larger format, bought a 5x7 Elwood enlarger which will differently need an AN, and have shot about 100 8x10 negs. I'm also drawn to the palladium print and thought that the AN would improve the quality of the negative. I have a heat absorbing glass in the filter drawer on my DIIv. But still, I like the idea of using just one neg holder for 35, 4.5x6, 6x6, 6x9 and 4x5 is very alluring. Point taken about possible dust problems but I'm very scrupulous, always "dust" both sides of the neg with compressed air and dust out the condensers at least once a month, if not more often if I'm using it heavily. So the dust problem would be taken care of. Another factor that I have to consider is that I often work with the same negative all day and night. Must take a beating being under the "lights" so long. ????. The AN might help there???
Anyway, You have been very helpful and I Thank You!
Regards, Bogdan
>>>The glass is used on the topside only of the carrier because if placed >>>on the bottom side as well will print the pattern of the ridges onto [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > Its a good solution-you give. Noting however: "coated" does not equate > to Ant newton,.....but still a good idea never the less for the bottom.
 Signature __________________________________________________________________ Bogdan Karasek Montréal, Québec e-mail: bkarasek@videotron.ca Canada
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen" "What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence" Ludwig Wittgenstein ________________________________________________________________
Mike King - 10 Apr 2006 16:10 GMT And the reason you put AN glass in a carrier in the first place are Newton Rings which appear when two smooth surfaces contact, in this case the base side of the film and the glass plate. Since the emulsion side of the film is not as smooth and secondly even sheet film has a slight curve the base side is all that causes the problem.
 Signature darkroommike
> HI, > [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > > Its a good solution-you give. Noting however: "coated" does not equate > > to Ant newton,.....but still a good idea never the less for the bottom. Thor Lancelot Simon - 10 Apr 2006 05:56 GMT >Its a good solution-you give. Noting however: "coated" does not equate >to Ant newton,.....but still a good idea never the less for the bottom. If you mean that coated glass isn't the same stuff a photo supplier will sell you as "anti-newton glass", that's correct; the acid-etched "anti glare" glass sold by frame shops is, as far as I can tell, the exact same product, however.
But if you mean "coated glass doesn't _work_ as anti-newton glass", you're not right. Newton's rings are an interference pattern; the waves that are interfering are those reflected back and forth between the surface of the negative and the surface of the glass. Coated glass reduces the amplitude of each reflection from its surface by about 95% compared to uncoated glass; so in fact it is a very effective way to avoid Newton's rings.
The acid-etched glass works in a different way (by increasing the distance between the negative and the glass, and by providing a diffuse reflection that does not give the interference pattern), and is cheaper. I do not think it works much better, though -- but since you can't use it below the negative, coated glass is your only option there anyway.
 Signature Thor Lancelot Simon tls@rek.tjls.com
"We cannot usually in social life pursue a single value or a single moral aim, untroubled by the need to compromise with others." - H.L.A. Hart
David Nebenzahl - 10 Apr 2006 06:48 GMT Thor Lancelot Simon spake thus:
>>Its a good solution-you give. Noting however: "coated" does not equate >>to Ant newton,.....but still a good idea never the less for the bottom. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > compared to uncoated glass; so in fact it is a very effective way to > avoid Newton's rings. Just for the benefit of my little brain, is that "coated glass" coated with the same stuff used on lenses (magnesium fluoride, etc.)?
 Signature Pierre, mon ami. Jetez-vous une plus de Scientologiste dans le vat de l'acide.
- from a posting in alt.religion.scientology titled "France recommends dissolving Scientologists"
Thor Lancelot Simon - 10 Apr 2006 13:45 GMT >Just for the benefit of my little brain, is that "coated glass" coated >with the same stuff used on lenses (magnesium fluoride, etc.)? I don't know. The coating process is different -- it's some kind of dip process instead of the vacuum sputter used to deposit coatings on lenses. The resulting coating isn't as durable but it is a lot cheaper to do and still cuts reflections.
One manufacturer (Tru-Vue) supposedly uses a sputter process for coating some of their framing glass but I don't know if this is really the same process used to coat lenses nor what the benefits are, in practice.
 Signature Thor Lancelot Simon tls@rek.tjls.com
"We cannot usually in social life pursue a single value or a single moral aim, untroubled by the need to compromise with others." - H.L.A. Hart
John - 12 Apr 2006 05:22 GMT >>Just for the benefit of my little brain, is that "coated glass" coated >>with the same stuff used on lenses (magnesium fluoride, etc.)? [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >the same process used to coat lenses nor what the benefits are, in >practice. From the Denglass FAQ :
The coatings on Denglas are fired onto the surface of the glass and are very durable.
What is the difference between antireflective and non-glare glass?
Non-glare glass is an acid etched glass that creates tiny pores in the surface of the glass.
Also the little fact that they have a link to Denton Vacuum (http://www.dentonvacuum.com/) tells me that they are probably using that sputtering process as well.
== John S. Douglas Photographer & Webmaster www.legacy-photo,com www.xs750.net
John - 12 Apr 2006 05:07 GMT >Just for the benefit of my little brain, is that "coated glass" coated >with the same stuff used on lenses (magnesium fluoride, etc.)? I believe it is. Looks green in reflected light. Amazing difference when used for print display.
== John S. Douglas Photographer & Webmaster www.legacy-photo,com www.xs750.net
Greg - 11 Apr 2006 00:53 GMT > >Its a good solution-you give. Noting however: "coated" does not equate > >to Ant newton,.....but still a good idea never the less for the bottom. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > glare" glass sold by frame shops is, as far as I can tell, the exact > same product, however. Meaning that coated implied clear glass with an anti reflective coating the same as eye glass- glass,...I would not put any frosted textured or otherwise non clear glass below the negative and expect a sharp result at the paper.
 Signature Carry me caravan take me away, take me to Portugal take me to Spain,Andalucia with fields full grain. I have to see you again and again. www.gregblankphoto.com
Thor Lancelot Simon - 11 Apr 2006 02:15 GMT >In article <e1cohj$ipu$1@reader1.panix.com>, >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >otherwise non clear glass below the negative and expect a sharp result >at the paper. Yeah, we're on violent agreement on this: anti newton glass under the negative is a very bad idea. But I have, in fact, seen newton rings on negatives that did in fact appear to come from the interface between the glass _under_ the negative and the negative -- and short of oiling both surfaces, which is what I did (using the entire bottle of immersion oil from a microscope kit I had stashed away in my basement, actually!) and which is quite a mess to clean up, the only real solution for that interface is coated glass.
 Signature Thor Lancelot Simon tls@rek.tjls.com
"We cannot usually in social life pursue a single value or a single moral aim, untroubled by the need to compromise with others." - H.L.A. Hart
John - 12 Apr 2006 05:05 GMT >Its a good solution-you give. Noting however: "coated" does not equate >to Ant newton,.....but still a good idea never the less for the bottom I use it for both top and bottom though I admit that I only use the top if the negative is bowed. Suprisingly I find that my TXP negs are flat. Perfectly flat ? Nope. But with one glass on the bottom and only 2X enlargments .... adequate.
== John S. Douglas Photographer & Webmaster www.legacy-photo,com www.xs750.net
Greg - 12 Apr 2006 06:14 GMT > >Its a good solution-you give. Noting however: "coated" does not equate > >to Ant newton,.....but still a good idea never the less for the bottom [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > www.legacy-photo,com > www.xs750.net Anti newton??? Or just coated?
 Signature The sometimes insomniac.
www.gregblankphoto.com
John - 13 Apr 2006 04:50 GMT >> I use it for both top and bottom though I admit that I only use the >> top if the negative is bowed. Suprisingly I find that my TXP negs are [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Anti newton??? Or just coated? Just coated. I have some AN in an Omega 4X5 carrier but alas I haven't used it in 4 years now.
== John S. Douglas Photographer & Webmaster www.legacy-photo,com www.xs750.net
|
|
|