Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / April 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Anti-Newtonion glass for 4x5

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bogdan Karasek - 09 Apr 2006 21:40 GMT
Hello,

I have a Omega DIIv and want to change the original 2 glass plates on
the 4x5 negative holder.  I haven't used it because both pieces of glass
which scratch marks on them; instead I use a glassless 4x5 holder.  I
was told that I should install Anti-Newtonian glass.  What is the
difference between regular glass and Anti_Newtonian glass?  Unclear on
the concept...

If there is a significant difference, I would like to replace them with
Anti-Newtonian glass.  Is there still a source for this glass, cut to
proper size?  Thanks.

Regards,
Bogdan
Signature

__________________________________________________________________
  Bogdan Karasek
  Montréal, Québec            e-mail: bkarasek@videotron.ca
  Canada

"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen"
"What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence"
  Ludwig Wittgenstein
________________________________________________________________

Greg - 09 Apr 2006 22:09 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Regards,
> Bogdan

You can or probably could get the glass through any good glass supplier,
but would  need to be cut to specified size if its and old carrier.
There are lots of variations on our Omega carriers-so the new
configuration may not apply to yours.

The idea behind AN glass is that the glass has a slight texture- a
series of ridges that hold the negative away from the glass surface
thereby preventing two smooth surfaces and eliminating the concentric
Newton rings.

The glass is used on the topside only of the carrier because if placed
on the bottom side as well  will print the pattern of the ridges onto
the photo paper it will also produce a fuzzy image.
Signature

Carry me caravan take me away, take me to Portugal take me to Spain,Andalucia with fields full grain. I have to see you again and again. www.gregblankphoto.com

Thor Lancelot Simon - 09 Apr 2006 22:28 GMT
>The glass is used on the topside only of the carrier because if placed
>on the bottom side as well  will print the pattern of the ridges onto
>the photo paper it will also produce a fuzzy image.

Actually, the best solution I've found is to use anti-newton glass --
available from frame shops as "anti-glare" or "no-glare" glass; it is
acid-etched to have a very very slight stippling -- above the negative,
and coated glass, also available from frame shops, under it.  If you
are doing color work you will want to get the fancy low-iron coated
glass for best results, and perhaps use it both above and below the
negative.

Frame shops often sell the "Denglas" brand of coated glass.  A large
shop can probably even seam the edges of this for you after cutting it
to size so that you do not risk cutting your fingers when you install
it in the carrier or remove it for cleaning.

Signature

 Thor Lancelot Simon                                        tls@rek.tjls.com

 "We cannot usually in social life pursue a single value or a single moral
  aim, untroubled by the need to compromise with others."      - H.L.A. Hart

David Nebenzahl - 09 Apr 2006 23:09 GMT
Thor Lancelot Simon spake thus:

> Frame shops often sell the "Denglas" brand of coated glass.  A large
> shop can probably even seam the edges of this for you after cutting it
> to size so that you do not risk cutting your fingers when you install
> it in the carrier or remove it for cleaning.

In the neverending advocacy campaign for DIY, this is trivially easy for
anyone to do at home with a piece of 600-grit wet-or-dry silicon carbide
paper and water.

Signature

Save the Planet
Kill Yourself

- motto of the Church of Euthanasia (http://www.churchofeuthanasia.org/)

Thor Lancelot Simon - 10 Apr 2006 00:02 GMT
>Thor Lancelot Simon spake thus:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>anyone to do at home with a piece of 600-grit wet-or-dry silicon carbide
>paper and water.

Sure, you can edge glass yourself.  However, you're going to have to deal
with a frame shop to get the coated glass in the first place, unless
you're buying a huge quanitity or want to pay Edmund Optics style prices;
so you might as well pick a frame shop that has an edge seamer, and then
you don't have to do any sanding; they can just make the edge safe for you
when they cut it.

Signature

 Thor Lancelot Simon                                        tls@rek.tjls.com

 "We cannot usually in social life pursue a single value or a single moral
  aim, untroubled by the need to compromise with others."      - H.L.A. Hart

Greg - 10 Apr 2006 01:05 GMT
> >The glass is used on the topside only of the carrier because if placed
> >on the bottom side as well  will print the pattern of the ridges onto
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> to size so that you do not risk cutting your fingers when you install
> it in the carrier or remove it for cleaning.

Its a good solution-you give. Noting however: "coated" does not equate
to Ant newton,.....but still a good idea never the less for the bottom.
Signature

Carry me caravan take me away, take me to Portugal take me to Spain,Andalucia with fields full grain. I have to see you again and again. www.gregblankphoto.com

Bogdan Karasek - 10 Apr 2006 04:25 GMT
HI,

I just want to thank all the people who responded.  Some very
interesting comments and information. Didn't know that you only put an
AN on the top and regular good quality glass on the bottom.  I've been
shooting 4x5 on and off for the past few years, mostly do 120 and 35,
but as I go on, I'm drawn to the larger format, bought a 5x7 Elwood
enlarger which will differently need an AN, and have shot about 100 8x10
negs.  I'm also drawn to the palladium print and thought that the AN
would improve the quality of the negative. I have a heat absorbing glass
in the filter drawer on my DIIv.  But still, I like the idea of using
just one neg holder for 35, 4.5x6, 6x6, 6x9 and 4x5 is very alluring.
Point taken about possible dust problems but I'm very scrupulous,
always "dust" both sides of the neg with compressed air and dust out the
condensers at least once a month, if not more often if I'm using it
heavily.  So the dust problem would be taken care of.  Another factor
that I have to consider is that I often work with the same negative all
day and night.  Must take a beating being under the "lights" so long.
????.  The AN might help there???

Anyway, You have been very helpful and I Thank You!

Regards,
Bogdan

>>>The glass is used on the topside only of the carrier because if placed
>>>on the bottom side as well  will print the pattern of the ridges onto
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Its a good solution-you give. Noting however: "coated" does not equate
> to Ant newton,.....but still a good idea never the less for the bottom.

Signature

__________________________________________________________________
  Bogdan Karasek
  Montréal, Québec            e-mail: bkarasek@videotron.ca
  Canada

"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen"
"What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence"
  Ludwig Wittgenstein
________________________________________________________________

Mike King - 10 Apr 2006 16:10 GMT
And the reason you put AN glass in a carrier in the first place are Newton
Rings which appear when two smooth surfaces contact, in this case the base
side of the film and the glass plate.  Since the emulsion side of the film
is not as smooth and secondly even sheet film has a slight curve the base
side is all that causes the problem.

Signature

darkroommike

> HI,
>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> > Its a good solution-you give. Noting however: "coated" does not equate
> > to Ant newton,.....but still a good idea never the less for the bottom.
Thor Lancelot Simon - 10 Apr 2006 05:56 GMT
>Its a good solution-you give. Noting however: "coated" does not equate
>to Ant newton,.....but still a good idea never the less for the bottom.

If you mean that coated glass isn't the same stuff a photo supplier will
sell you as "anti-newton glass", that's correct; the acid-etched "anti
glare" glass sold by frame shops is, as far as I can tell, the exact
same product, however.

But if you mean "coated glass doesn't _work_ as anti-newton glass",
you're not right.  Newton's rings are an interference pattern; the
waves that are interfering are those reflected back and forth between
the surface of the negative and the surface of the glass.  Coated glass
reduces the amplitude of each reflection from its surface by about 95%
compared to uncoated glass; so in fact it is a very effective way to
avoid Newton's rings.

The acid-etched glass works in a different way (by increasing the distance
between the negative and the glass, and by providing a diffuse reflection
that does not give the interference pattern), and is cheaper.  I do not
think it works much better, though -- but since you can't use it
below the negative, coated glass is your only option there anyway.

Signature

 Thor Lancelot Simon                                        tls@rek.tjls.com

 "We cannot usually in social life pursue a single value or a single moral
  aim, untroubled by the need to compromise with others."      - H.L.A. Hart

David Nebenzahl - 10 Apr 2006 06:48 GMT
Thor Lancelot Simon spake thus:

>>Its a good solution-you give. Noting however: "coated" does not equate
>>to Ant newton,.....but still a good idea never the less for the bottom.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> compared to uncoated glass; so in fact it is a very effective way to
> avoid Newton's rings.

Just for the benefit of my little brain, is that "coated glass" coated
with the same stuff used on lenses (magnesium fluoride, etc.)?

Signature

Pierre, mon ami. Jetez-vous une plus de Scientologiste
dans le vat de l'acide.

- from a posting in alt.religion.scientology titled
"France recommends dissolving Scientologists"

Thor Lancelot Simon - 10 Apr 2006 13:45 GMT
>Just for the benefit of my little brain, is that "coated glass" coated
>with the same stuff used on lenses (magnesium fluoride, etc.)?

I don't know.  The coating process is different -- it's some kind of
dip process instead of the vacuum sputter used to deposit coatings on
lenses.  The resulting coating isn't as durable but it is a lot cheaper
to do and still cuts reflections.

One manufacturer (Tru-Vue) supposedly uses a sputter process for
coating some of their framing glass but I don't know if this is really
the same process used to coat lenses nor what the benefits are, in
practice.

Signature

 Thor Lancelot Simon                                        tls@rek.tjls.com

 "We cannot usually in social life pursue a single value or a single moral
  aim, untroubled by the need to compromise with others."      - H.L.A. Hart

John - 12 Apr 2006 05:22 GMT
>>Just for the benefit of my little brain, is that "coated glass" coated
>>with the same stuff used on lenses (magnesium fluoride, etc.)?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>the same process used to coat lenses nor what the benefits are, in
>practice.

From the Denglass FAQ :

The coatings on Denglas are fired onto the surface of the glass and
are very durable.

What is the difference between antireflective and non-glare glass?

Non-glare glass is an acid etched glass that creates tiny pores in the
surface of the glass.

Also the little fact that they have a link to Denton Vacuum
(http://www.dentonvacuum.com/) tells me that they are probably using
that sputtering process as well.

==
    John S. Douglas
    Photographer & Webmaster
    www.legacy-photo,com
    www.xs750.net
John - 12 Apr 2006 05:07 GMT
>Just for the benefit of my little brain, is that "coated glass" coated
>with the same stuff used on lenses (magnesium fluoride, etc.)?

I believe it is. Looks green in reflected light. Amazing difference
when used for print display.

==
    John S. Douglas
    Photographer & Webmaster
    www.legacy-photo,com
    www.xs750.net
Greg - 11 Apr 2006 00:53 GMT
> >Its a good solution-you give. Noting however: "coated" does not equate
> >to Ant newton,.....but still a good idea never the less for the bottom.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> glare" glass sold by frame shops is, as far as I can tell, the exact
> same product, however.

Meaning that coated implied clear glass with an anti reflective coating
the same as eye glass- glass,...I would not put any frosted textured or
otherwise non clear glass below the negative and expect a sharp result
at the paper.
Signature

Carry me caravan take me away, take me to Portugal take me to Spain,Andalucia with fields full grain. I have to see you again and again. www.gregblankphoto.com

Thor Lancelot Simon - 11 Apr 2006 02:15 GMT
>In article <e1cohj$ipu$1@reader1.panix.com>,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>otherwise non clear glass below the negative and expect a sharp result
>at the paper.

Yeah, we're on violent agreement on this: anti newton glass under the
negative is a very bad idea.  But I have, in fact, seen newton rings
on negatives that did in fact appear to come from the interface between
the glass _under_ the negative and the negative -- and short of oiling
both surfaces, which is what I did (using the entire bottle of immersion
oil from a microscope kit I had stashed away in my basement, actually!)
and which is quite a mess to clean up, the only real solution for that
interface is coated glass.

Signature

 Thor Lancelot Simon                                        tls@rek.tjls.com

 "We cannot usually in social life pursue a single value or a single moral
  aim, untroubled by the need to compromise with others."      - H.L.A. Hart

John - 12 Apr 2006 05:05 GMT
>Its a good solution-you give. Noting however: "coated" does not equate
>to Ant newton,.....but still a good idea never the less for the bottom

I use it for both top and bottom though I admit that I only use the
top if the negative is bowed. Suprisingly I find that my TXP negs are
flat. Perfectly flat ? Nope. But with one glass on the bottom and only
2X enlargments .... adequate.

==
    John S. Douglas
    Photographer & Webmaster
    www.legacy-photo,com
    www.xs750.net
Greg - 12 Apr 2006 06:14 GMT
> >Its a good solution-you give. Noting however: "coated" does not equate
> >to Ant newton,.....but still a good idea never the less for the bottom
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>      www.legacy-photo,com
>      www.xs750.net

Anti newton??? Or just coated?
Signature

The sometimes insomniac.

www.gregblankphoto.com

John - 13 Apr 2006 04:50 GMT
>> I use it for both top and bottom though I admit that I only use the
>> top if the negative is bowed. Suprisingly I find that my TXP negs are
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Anti newton??? Or just coated?

Just coated. I have some AN in an Omega 4X5 carrier but alas I haven't
used it in 4 years now.

==
    John S. Douglas
    Photographer & Webmaster
    www.legacy-photo,com
    www.xs750.net
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.