Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / February 2006
Merits of Print Viewing Via Arc Lamp.
|
|
Thread rating:  |
G- Blank - 11 Feb 2006 01:08 GMT I was just considering the purchase of some welders goggles to view my next batch of prints and was wondering if anyone has experiences they wish to share on how to string a line of arc lamps in a gallery.
(Sorry I couldn't resist ;)
 Signature "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
greg_____photo(dot)com
Jean-David Beyer - 11 Feb 2006 02:47 GMT > I was just considering the purchase of some welders > goggles to view my next batch of prints and was wondering > if anyone has experiences they wish to share on how to string > a line of arc lamps in a gallery. It is not so much the total intensity of the light, but the relative amount of light falling on the image compared to the surround (until we get so low the eye no longer perceives) or so high it hurts.
The trick to see more of the dense black is to illuminate just the image, studiously avoiding the mat board around it. And that can be done without arc lights. Quartz-Iodide lamps will do just fine, but you must shield the light coming out so it falls _only on the print_, not on the mat board.
Since most galleries refuse to do that (even if they know they should), I matted some prints on some (about) 18% gray mat board. The eye considers that to be white, so the highlights on the print look very nice indeed, and the blacks blacker than usual. But this is still a poor approximation to what you could get if you could take the trouble to illuminate the prints properly (no-one, AFAIK, does this), but see Chapter 22, Theory of Tone Reproduction, by C.N.Nelson, in "Theory of the Photographic Process", Third Edition edited by T.H.James. Kenneth Mees did the first two editions. Especially Fig. 22.3 on page 469 and the accompanying text.
 Signature .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org ^^-^^ 21:35:00 up 21 days, 13:03, 4 users, load average: 4.41, 4.31, 4.20
Richard Knoppow - 11 Feb 2006 06:27 GMT >> I was just considering the purchase of some welders >> goggles to view my next batch of prints and was wondering [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > Especially Fig. 22.3 on page 469 and the accompanying > text. There is also a good summary of the work of L.A.Jones and C.N.Nelson in _Fundamentals of Photographic Theory_ 2nd edition, T.H.James and George C. Higgins 1960 Morgan and Morgan. Jones, with several co-investigators including Nelson conducted very extensive research into photographic tone reproduction. Jones also developed the minimum usable density method of film speed measurement which was adopted internally by Kodak and later as the first ASA system. The original papers are very interesting but some of the journals they are printed in are hard to find. Those interested in the Zone System should also be familiar with this work which deals with similar problems but from a different perspective. The "light box" method of illuminating prints gives a truely spectacular effect, very similar to a back lighted transparency. Most reflection print materials are capable of greater Dmax than is useful under normal illumination. The print must be especially made for this type of illumination, generally of higher contrst and printed darker. The reserve of black in most papers can be demonstrated by illuminating them through the back. You will often see details in the dark parts which are either invisible or hard to see under normal lighting. As far as arc lights one can get rebuilt used ones from Mole-Richardson Co. in Hollywood at very attractive prices. However, you will have to re-wire your house or buy a suitable generator. I am also unsure of the current availability of carbons. Most arc lamps used for set lighting and for projection today are of the Xenon type but you could get some of those two.
 Signature --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA dickburk@ix.netcom.com
G- Blank - 13 Feb 2006 14:50 GMT > >> I was just considering the purchase of some welders > >> goggles to view my next batch of prints and was wondering [quoted text clipped - 68 lines] > today are of the Xenon type but you could get some of those > two. It is quite interesting to me that a rather tongue in cheek post on my part sometimes yields very interesting results, I thank you both for giving additional food for thought.
 Signature "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
greg_____photo(dot)com
Nicholas O. Lindan - 14 Feb 2006 19:04 GMT > "Theory of the Photographic Process", > Kenneth Mees did the first two editions.
> Third Edition edited by T.H.James. I think it has been mentioned before but the third edition is a different book from the earlier editions.
It's like opening the third edition of "Great Expectations" and finding "David Copperfield".
To find either: http://www.abebooks.com/
 Signature Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio Consulting Engineer: Electronics; Informatics; Photonics. To reply, remove spaces: n o lindan at ix . netcom . com Fstop timer - http://www.nolindan.com/da/fstop/index.htm
Richard Knoppow - 15 Feb 2006 01:00 GMT >> "Theory of the Photographic Process", >> Kenneth Mees did the first two editions. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > To find either: http://www.abebooks.com/ Indeed, the first two are the work of Mees, the third was published after his death and is mostly the work of Thomas H. James, who eventually took over as head of the Kodak Research Labs. The original and "revised" editions have a sense of unity where the third and fourth editions are more like a collection of journal articles. Grant Haist's _Modern Photographic Processing_ was, I think, an attempt to publish a modern version of Mees's book. One which was aimed at the advanced photographer rather than the specialist. Today, the only way to keep up is to read journal articles and patent literature. For those who don't know who Mees was perhaps a bit of biography is in order. C.E.Kenneth Mees was an English chemist who became a partner in Wratten and Wainwright, an early manufacturer of photographic materials in England. W&W was renouned for the quality of their materials, partculary in being advanced in color sensitizing. This was mostly the work of Mees. Through his research on dyes, which are used to sensitize emulsions, Mees also developed excellent light filters, hence the name Wratten Filter, which remains to this day. In 1912 Mees was invited by George Eastman to come to Rochester and set up a proper research laboratory for him. Mees agreed provided that Eastman would buy out his partners, the Wrattens, father and son (Wainright had died long before) but leave them in charge of the company. Eastman agreed and Mees set up the famous Kodak Research Laboratories. Mees decided from the outset that research papers from the labs would be published in established, peer reviewed, scientific and technical journals rather than in a house organ. This immediately gave them high prestige and wide availability. George Eastman wanted to make photography available to everyone and included education in photography in his offerings. The Kodak labs published prolifically, many of the papers are still of great interest and also trace the historical development of the photographic process. Mees retired about 1960 and died about a year later. The last book he was personally responsible for was _From Dry Plates to Ektachrome Film_ which was published after his death.
 Signature --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA dickburk@ix.netcom.com
Ken Nadvornick - 15 Feb 2006 17:04 GMT > Indeed, the first two are the work of Mees, the third was > published after his death and is mostly the work of Thomas [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > Plates to Ektachrome Film_ which was published after his > death. Sometimes... when I have a relaxed hour or two to spend... I simply Google-up "Author=Richard Knoppow" and sit back with a cold drink and enjoy the read. And this on Usenet, of all places...
Ken
Tom Phillips - 16 Feb 2006 07:34 GMT > >> "Theory of the Photographic Process", > >> Kenneth Mees did the first two editions. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > > > To find either: http://www.abebooks.com/ One might mention that "Theory" is out of print and generally WAY overpriced by used book dealers. But if one takes their time a realistic bargain can still be found. I purchased a mint condition plus autographed 4th edition not long ago for a mere $40...
> > Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio > > Consulting Engineer: Electronics; Informatics; Photonics. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > Today, the only way to keep up is to read journal > articles and patent literature. Kodak researchers are still publishing papers, but sadly Kodak as a company seems no longer committed to advancing true photographic knowledge. Still, an interesting synopsis of Mr. Mees...
> For those who don't know who Mees was perhaps a bit of > biography is in order. C.E.Kenneth Mees was an English [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > Los Angeles, CA, USA > dickburk@ix.netcom.com
|
|
|