> Are Polaroid basicly killing of an art for?
I guess killing off an art form is one way to look at it. There is a
process called water graphs possible with there 600 instant films,
though that is very different than SX-70 film manipulation.
> I am new to photography and I had thought about trying it, so I am sad
> to see it go, I would have thought that sales of SX-70 would have
> remaind strong as I see so many people going on about it.
These are very popular, or were, on EBAY. The cameras can still work
with 600 instant film, but require a modification to alter the light
meter reading. Just a guess, but they probably sell a ton more of the
other instant films, especially to law enforcement, insurance, and
construction organizations.
> As for polaroid in general, It is in decline, but Polaroids are instand
> print cameras, there will probably always be people who need prints
> there and then, no?
I still see an appeal to using Polaroid instant films. They are just so
simple, and probably a very cool basic fun system. Push a button and get
a print, even at a somewhat reasonable cost.
The other Polaroid realm has actually seen a recent expansion of sales
from Fuji, that being the peel apart films. I think those will
consolidate a little, with probably just one or two colour choices, and
a few B/W choices. Some professionals still use these for proofing, or
checking lighting, or in fashion photography. There are some more
interesting manipulations and fine art approaches with peel apart films;
this is most of the Polaroid stuff I do and exhibit.
You can see more Polaroid creative work at:
<http://www.polaroid.com/creative/index.jsp?PRDREG=null>
I should mention that while I have tried some of this with the Fuji peel
apart films, I have yet to find good and consistent methods. Part of
that I think is down to subtle differences in the way the Fuji instant
films are produced.
Ciao!
Gordon Moat
A G Studio
<http://www.allgstudio.com>