I just posted this note on the large format group as it involves 4x5
negs developed in a traditional darkroom.
In the past few months I have printed two or three images from 4x5 negs
that have many very small white spots on the 16x20 print. The negatives
show that the black neg spots are not "on" the neg like dust spots, but
exposed onto it. Yesterday I made two bald sky exposures, one with my
210mm and the other with my 150mm as I'm sure the trouble negs were
exposed by one of these lenses. The 210mm showed a hundred or more tiny
black spots. But only two hours before I shot some still lifes with
this lens, developed all negs at the same time in the same chemicals and
those negs were perfect. The film is Kodak Tri-X 320 TXP film purchased
within the last year. I always expose with an f-stop in the mid range,
neither wide open nor with a very small aperature. The problem seems to
be bad film, but randomly appearing from the same pack. Or am I missing
something? Any ideas?
Art
UC - 07 Feb 2006 16:10 GMT
Did you use acid stop bath?
> I just posted this note on the large format group as it involves 4x5
> negs developed in a traditional darkroom.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> something? Any ideas?
> Art
G- Blank - 07 Feb 2006 16:32 GMT
> I just posted this note on the large format group as it involves 4x5
> negs developed in a traditional darkroom.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> something? Any ideas?
> Art
Could it be you are printing with condenser lamphouse
and the condensers are dirty? check the negative for black
spots.

Signature
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
greg_____photo(dot)com
dschneller@sympatico.ca - 07 Feb 2006 16:32 GMT
> I just posted this note on the large format group as it involves 4x5
> negs developed in a traditional darkroom.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> something? Any ideas?
> Art
Pin holes in your bellows, just thinking if the still life shots were
indoors and the problem negs where shot outdoors.
David Nebenzahl - 07 Feb 2006 16:38 GMT
dschneller@sympatico.ca spake thus:
>>I just posted this note on the large format group as it involves 4x5
>>negs developed in a traditional darkroom.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Pin holes in your bellows, just thinking if the still life shots were
> indoors and the problem negs where shot outdoors.
Nope; pinholes will fog the film, or give large spots, not tiny ones as
he described. (Think of the cone of light between the pinhole and the film.)

Signature
If the United States government, with all its capacity to collect
and interpret information, did not see Hamas doing very well in the
Palestinian election in the wake of these other Islamist victories,
then it is either willfully blind or totally incompetent—-
and neither possibility is a very comforting thought.
- Rami G. Khouri, editor at large of the Beirut-based _Daily Star_
UC - 07 Feb 2006 17:33 GMT
> I just posted this note on the large format group as it involves 4x5
> negs developed in a traditional darkroom.
> In the past few months I have printed two or three images from 4x5 negs
> that have many very small white spots on the 16x20 print.
This happened to me a few times when I went to water rinse instead of
acetic acid stop bath. When I went back to using acetic acid stop bath,
the problem disappeared.
> The negatives
> show that the black neg spots are not "on" the neg like dust spots, but
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> something? Any ideas?
> Art
Art Reitsch - 07 Feb 2006 20:47 GMT
I use HC-110 developer and yes, I use an acid stop bath. Note: I'm not
talking about printing, the black spots are on the negative after
developing it.
Art
>
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
>
UC - 07 Feb 2006 20:49 GMT
Hmmmmmmmm..................
Try new batch of film....
Do you use trays? Try tank and hanger....
> I use HC-110 developer and yes, I use an acid stop bath. Note: I'm not
> talking about printing, the black spots are on the negative after
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> >
> >
G- Blank - 07 Feb 2006 21:27 GMT
> I use HC-110 developer and yes, I use an acid stop bath. Note: I'm not
> talking about printing, the black spots are on the negative after
> developing it.
> Art
Its either the film or
Art it could be the holder, your using sheet film I believe you said.
In any event way back when I first started using sheet film I had some
old holders, and they had small pin sized scrapes on the metal....I used
a sharpie to blacken the places.

Signature
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
greg_____photo(dot)com
UC - 07 Feb 2006 20:58 GMT
You could be dispersing some kind of contaminant onto the film somehow.
Photo chemistry powders can become airborne dust and settle on your
film at some point. Just raising the possibility...
> I just posted this note on the large format group as it involves 4x5
> negs developed in a traditional darkroom.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> something? Any ideas?
> Art
Richard Knoppow - 08 Feb 2006 02:06 GMT
>I just posted this note on the large format group as it
>involves 4x5 negs developed in a traditional darkroom.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> something? Any ideas?
> Art
This is pretty puzzling. Have you examined the spots with
a strong magnifier. Check the surface of the film. This
might tell you if there was a coating problem. I very much
doubt that its due to out gassing as was suggested by
another poster. Outgassing in acid stop bath happens only
when the developer contains carbonate, which HC-110 does
not. In any case, it does not seem to be problem with modern
films.
I can't think of anything that would produce _sharp_
black spots on negatives. Almost everything, pinholes in the
camera or reflections from something, produce blured spots.
Perhaps the holder dark slide has holes in it but I've never
seen such a thing and it would probably produce streaks not
spots. I don't suppose you were using a focal plane shutter.

Signature
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com
UC - 08 Feb 2006 03:02 GMT
Taking an unexposed sheet DIRECTLY from the pack (open a new one) and
processing it is the only way I can think of to determine whether
defective film is involved or not.
> >I just posted this note on the large format group as it
> >involves 4x5 negs developed in a traditional darkroom.
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> Los Angeles, CA, USA
> dickburk@ix.netcom.com
Art Reitsch - 08 Feb 2006 16:23 GMT
Thanks for all the thoughts. I posted my original note on
rec.photo.equipment.large-format also and received a really outstanding
reply, fairly lengthy, which I recommend reading for everyone. It's the
one from Michael Gudzinowicz. I've tightened up my development
procedure following his suggestions but think he may have hit on the
problem I outlined since I seem to be in good shape on his other ideas.
He suggests inadequate agitation during fixing. Inadequate? I don't
agitate at all except for a lift or two on the film holders during the
eight minutes of fixing (he suggests 10 minutes). I'm also adding some
alcohol to the Photoflo for the final rinse.
But I think all his suggestions are worth looking at for anyone
developing film. These newsgroups sure pay off!
Art
>Taking an unexposed sheet DIRECTLY from the pack (open a new one) and
>processing it is the only way I can think of to determine whether
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>
>
UC - 08 Feb 2006 16:36 GMT
You should agitate vigorously during fixing. Why have you not been
doing this?
> Thanks for all the thoughts. I posted my original note on
> rec.photo.equipment.large-format also and received a really outstanding
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
> >
> >
Art Reitsch - 08 Feb 2006 23:36 GMT
Because I missed this step during the workshop I took from Barnbaum. I
looked at his book, the most recent edition, and found his instructions,
not underlined by me as are many other instruction passages. He says
agitate two or more minutes and fix for a total of 7-10 minutes. So the
instructions are there, I just missed them. But I'm going with 10
minutes of continuous agitation as advised by the poster I mentioned.
Also, I never had a problem through 300+ negatives so wasn't motivated
to research and learn the right way.
Art
>You should agitate vigorously during fixing. Why have you not been
>doing this?
[quoted text clipped - 78 lines]
>
>
UC - 08 Feb 2006 23:38 GMT
1. Use Rapid Fixer
2. Agitate vigorously
3. Fix 3-5 minutes, no more
> Because I missed this step during the workshop I took from Barnbaum. I
> looked at his book, the most recent edition, and found his instructions,
[quoted text clipped - 75 lines]
> >
> >
Ray - 09 Feb 2006 12:20 GMT
I was plagued by "white spots" despite using all filtered water & chemicals.
I reprinted and lo' and behold, more spots, but in different locations on
the paper. It's was the papers fault. I now use a premier paper, but once in
a while a couple of spots.
Ray
>I just posted this note on the large format group as it involves 4x5 negs
>developed in a traditional darkroom.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> something? Any ideas?
> Art