Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

How does selenium do it?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Lew - 01 Feb 2006 14:20 GMT
Can anyone explain how the same toner can have opposite effects on different
papers? I'm referring on krst's ability to cool off cold tone papers and
warm up warm tone papers while, iirc, helping with the dmax of both.
-Lew
Tom Phillips - 02 Feb 2006 01:43 GMT
> Can anyone explain how the same toner can have opposite effects on different
> papers? I'm referring on krst's ability to cool off cold tone papers and
> warm up warm tone papers while, iirc, helping with the dmax of both.
> -Lew

Interesting question. I myself have only
been interested in the color and density
change I know I'll get with certain papers.
So, can't give you an educated reason and
chemists here probably have a better answer.
But selenium works by bonding with the silver
in the prints emulsion. Thus I surmise the
selenium enhances the paper tone. If cold
tone you get more cold tone. If warm tone
you get more warm tone? frankly, I've found
some warm tone effects unpredicatable, but
not with cold tone papers I've used.

Although with Ilford Gallery (when I used to
use it) there would be a consistent color
change from natural green (chlorobromide
emulsion) to neutral regardless of how long
toning was.
G- Blank - 02 Feb 2006 02:15 GMT
> > Can anyone explain how the same toner can have opposite effects on different
> > papers? I'm referring on krst's ability to cool off cold tone papers and
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> emulsion) to neutral regardless of how long
> toning was.

It has a lot to do with the specific chemistry of the
paper and toner interaction. This can be a result
of how finely the silver is milled that a specific paper
is made from, or the type of paper. Length of time in the
toner, water chemistry (as in ph and mineral content) and toner
dilution- probably infinite variables could be had with non delineated
print making criteria.

Signature

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918

greg_____photo(dot)com

David Nebenzahl - 02 Feb 2006 02:20 GMT
G- Blank spake thus:

>>> Can anyone explain how the same toner can have opposite effects
>>> on different papers? I'm referring on krst's ability to cool off
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> dilution- probably infinite variables could be had with non delineated
> print making criteria.

In other words, "I don't know".

Signature

The only reason corrupt Republicans rule the roost in Washington
is because the corrupt Democrats can't muster any viable opposition.

Tom Phillips - 02 Feb 2006 02:44 GMT
> G- Blank spake thus:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> In other words, "I don't know".

A lot like most of your posts...
G- Blank - 02 Feb 2006 11:31 GMT
> > G- Blank spake thus:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> A lot like most of your posts...

 The problem is there is no definable set of circumstances as the
question was asked, quite a few "borderline"  "photographers"
notoriously ask these  nebulous questions without doing the
math-research-testing themselves and then BITCH because they get a less
than concise answer. I could have flatly answered "NO" there is noway
based on the flawed way you asked the question to define the outcome
but chose to try and get him to think-Oh well I guess somethings
just don't work. I don't typically take the attitude that people owe me
but I will say I have tested a sh.t load more paper and chemistry
than all but perhaps a few here will ever test. Like in 100's-1000's of
emulsion batches.

FWIW I did give a concise answer given the info he provided.

And as far as David is concerned if he could make a valuable
contribution to this or other ng's it might be worth my time to
unkill file him,..... but it won't happen ;^)

Did you notice how a new trend seems to be creating their "cute"
little political sigs...........

Signature

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918

greg_____photo(dot)com

Tom Phillips - 03 Feb 2006 01:58 GMT
> > > G- Blank spake thus:
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> FWIW I did give a concise answer given the info he provided.

What Nebenzahl derides Nebenzahl doesn't understand...

> And as far as David is concerned if he could make a valuable
> contribution to this or other ng's it might be worth my time to
> unkill file him,..... but it won't happen ;^)

r.p.d slide downhill the moment he began gracing
it with his derisive presence. I'm sure he
considers that his most valuable contribution
as he's clearly proud if it.

> Did you notice how a new trend seems to be creating their "cute"
> little political sigs...........

Seems to parallel the trend to remake r.p.d and
r.p.e.LF in their own image...
Lew - 02 Feb 2006 04:07 GMT
...that's what I thought he said, too.

> In other words, "I don't know".
G- Blank - 02 Feb 2006 11:13 GMT
> ...that's what I thought he said, too.
> >
> > In other words, "I don't know".

Ok have it that way- I won't be answering any more questions.

Signature

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918

greg_____photo(dot)com

Lew - 02 Feb 2006 04:06 GMT
Yes, I seem to get a nice, cool charcoal grey/black from my warm tone papers
regardless of concentration or time.

> Although with Ilford Gallery (when I used to
> use it) there would be a consistent color
> change from natural green (chlorobromide
> emulsion) to neutral regardless of how long
> toning was.
Lew - 02 Feb 2006 05:46 GMT
Oops! I meant from my neutral tone papers.
> Yes, I seem to get a nice, cool charcoal grey/black from my warm tone
> papers regardless of concentration or time.
Ken Nadvornick - 02 Feb 2006 17:36 GMT
> Can anyone explain how the same toner can have opposite effects
> on different  papers? I'm referring on krst's ability to cool off
> cold tone papers and warm up warm tone papers while, iirc, helping
> with the dmax of both.

Regarding only the "dmax" part of your question, according to Stephen
Anchell in The Darkroom Cookbook (2nd Edition, p. 96) the act of selenium
toning a silver print converts the metallic silver in the print into silver
selenite, which "has a deeper maximum black than metallic silver."

The various color changes themselves are enumerated and described, but not
explained in depth.

Ken

From the book:

"Selenium toners, such as Dassonville T-55, convert the silver to [silver]
selenite (examples of commercial selenium toners are Berg Selenium toner and
Kodak Rapid Selenium Toner).

"Selenite is impervious to almost all environmental pollutants, with the
added benefit that, at dilutions of 1:20 or greater,* it will not effect
image tone. Not only that, but selenite has a deeper maximum black than
metallic silver, enhancing the richness of the shadows.

* "The dilution is paper dependent.  Some papers can stand a much lower
dilution, some require more."
Lew - 02 Feb 2006 19:08 GMT
Good enough on the dmax issue. . Since silver selinite is silver selinite
regardless of whether the underlying paper is warm toned or cool toned,
we're left with the cool->cooler, warm->warmer part. Why don't all papers
just tend toward silver selinte tone as toning increases?
Thanks.
-Lew
dan.c.quinn@att.net - 02 Feb 2006 22:56 GMT
> Since silver selinite is silver selinite...  Lew

  As with sulf-IDE it is selen-IDE. Sulfur and Selenium
are two very similar elements. As a solution of sodium sulfide
will produce silver sulfide, a solution of sodium selenide
might be expected to produce silver selenide.
 Search this NG for, selenium selenite . Dr. Gudzinowicz as
well as others offer some good information. Dan
Richard Knoppow - 03 Feb 2006 22:58 GMT
> Can anyone explain how the same toner can have opposite
> effects on different papers? I'm referring on krst's
> ability to cool off cold tone papers and warm up warm tone
> papers while, iirc, helping with the dmax of both.
> -Lew
  The color of the original image and the color of the
toned image are both dependent on the size and  structure of
the silver crystals. In general (meaning with some
qualifications), the coarser the crystals the bluer the
image color. Extremely finely devided silver (colloidal
silver) is bright yellow. In fact, the yellow filter layer
in Kodachrome is made of colloidal silver. When toned the
structure tends to remain the same as the original. So, the
Silver selenide resulting from Selenium toning will be
bluish or purple on cold tone papers and on film and more
red or yellowish where the original silver is finely
devided. Sulfiding toners are similar, the coarser the
original the colder the brown. In fact, Polysulfide toners,
like Kodak Brown Toner, result in a slight cooling of the
color of microfilm when used to protect the image. This is
because the color of Silver sulfide is also dependent on the
structure of the crystals.
  Very cold tone papers are usually toned by bleaching them
first and then treating them in a sulfide bath. The image
color still depends somewhat on the original color but not
so directly because the original silver is converted back to
a halide by the bleach before toning. Direct toners, like
KBT or Kodak Selenium toner, tend to preserve the original
size and distribution of the image silver.
  KRST and some other toners (Gold for instance) intensify
the original image. This is NOT because they are "blacker"
then the original silver but because they add to the
covering power of the silver by increasing the size of the
grains a little. Actually, silver can be used for
intensifying, for instance Kodak In-5. This intensifier
increases density without chaning image color.
  Indirect Sepia toners (bleach and redevelop type) can
also be intensifiers provided that there is absolutely no
hypo remaining in the emulsion. Any hypo will combine with
the bleach to form Farmer's reducer and will slighly lower
the density rather than increase it.

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

Lew - 04 Feb 2006 04:15 GMT
Thanks for taking the time, Richard. This is a thorough, clear and
considered explanation.

-Lew
Richard Knoppow - 04 Feb 2006 05:59 GMT
> Thanks for taking the time, Richard. This is a thorough,
> clear and considered explanation.
>
> -Lew
  Looking at it again I think it might have been clearer if
I had included something about the light being scattered by
the particles which make up the image. It is the scattering
and interference of different wavelengths that produces the
color. While we see "grain" in both negatives and prints the
actual silver crystals are microscopic. The apparent grain
is due to grouping of the individual particals, either
actual clumping or the appearance of clumps from grains at
different depths of the emulsion. Both the size and
distribution of the individual silver particles and "clumps"
affect the image color. Toning further changes the
structure.
  Some materials used in toners have an actual color. For
instance, the blue generated by Iron-blue toner. This is
similar to the material of which blue prints are made.

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

Lew - 04 Feb 2006 12:27 GMT
Well, I can't accept your criticism of your original answer, but I
appreciate the additional information.
-Lew

>> Thanks for taking the time, Richard. This is a thorough, clear and
>> considered explanation.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> blue generated by Iron-blue toner. This is similar to the material of
> which blue prints are made.
Nicholas O. Lindan - 04 Feb 2006 14:47 GMT
> Some materials used in toners have an actual color. For
> instance, the blue generated by Iron-blue toner. This is
> similar to the material of which blue prints are made.

Often called 'Prussian Blue', Iron(III)-hexacyanoferrate(II),
is/is related to/ the blue that forms when Farmer's reducer goes off.

The origin of color of Prussian Blue is an electronic transition
from a low-spin Fe2+ ion in a carbon-coordination center to a
high spin Fe 3+ ion in a nitrogen-coordination enter that occurs
when visible light is absorbed at 680nm. This absorption is
called the intervalence transfer band which produces the intense
color of Prussian Blue.

Like I knew that all along....

Cribbed from:
http://www.sewanee.edu/chem/Chem&Art/Detail_Pages/Pigments/Prussian_Blue

Signature

Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Consulting Engineer:  Electronics; Informatics; Photonics.
To reply, remove spaces: n o lindan at ix  . netcom . com
Fstop timer -  http://www.nolindan.com/da/fstop/index.htm

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.