Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Which wash check to use?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
seog - 29 Jan 2006 04:41 GMT
I want to make sure I'm washing my fiber prints adequately. What's the
difference between HT-1a and HT-2 residual hypo test? Is one preferable? I'd
rather go with HT-2 since I have silver nitrate on hand and the permanganate
in HT-1 is supposed to be nasty stuff. The Residual Silver Test test for
adequate fixing not washing is that correct? THNX.

Signature

It is not our patriotic duty to send children to be butchered & slaughtered
& to butcher & slaughter others every time a general or a politician gets a
hardon for a war. Rather, it is our patriotic duty to demand the highest
burden of proof to justify war. It is also our patriotic duty to hold
treasonous, corporate whore, war criminals accountable for their actions.

Tom Phillips - 29 Jan 2006 08:10 GMT
> I want to make sure I'm washing my fiber prints adequately. What's the
> difference between HT-1a and HT-2 residual hypo test? Is one preferable? I'd
> rather go with HT-2 since I have silver nitrate on hand and the permanganate
> in HT-1 is supposed to be nasty stuff. The Residual Silver Test test for
> adequate fixing not washing is that correct? THNX.

I'm only familiar with HT2. P. permanganate
is typically used for reducers, tray cleaners,
and stain removers. Not sure then why this would
be an ingredient in a washing test.

Calling Richard...
Jean-David Beyer - 29 Jan 2006 11:22 GMT
>> I want to make sure I'm washing my fiber prints adequately. What's the
>> difference between HT-1a and HT-2 residual hypo test? Is one preferable? I'd
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> and stain removers. Not sure then why this would
> be an ingredient in a washing test.

There is such a test, but it is not very sensitive.

You mix a solution of 1 gram of potassium permanganate and one to 2 gram of
sodium carbonate in a litre of water. It is seriously violet. Allow about 5
ml of stuff to drain from a print or negative into a small graduate. Add one
drop of the permanganate solution to this. Repeat the test with an equal
amount of water instead of the drainings. Compare the colors of the two. If
the color persists in the drainings for as long as it does in the fresh
water, the washing may be considered to be complete.

Signature

 .~.  Jean-David Beyer          Registered Linux User 85642.
 /V\  PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A         Registered Machine   241939.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey    http://counter.li.org
^^-^^ 06:15:00 up 8 days, 21:42, 5 users, load average: 5.18, 5.22, 5.14

Tom Phillips - 29 Jan 2006 12:09 GMT
> >> I want to make sure I'm washing my fiber prints adequately. What's the
> >> difference between HT-1a and HT-2 residual hypo test? Is one preferable? I'd
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> the color persists in the drainings for as long as it does in the fresh
> water, the washing may be considered to be complete.

Well that explains a bunch. HT-1a is not applied
to the print...thanks
John - 29 Jan 2006 17:02 GMT
>> I want to make sure I'm washing my fiber prints adequately. What's the
>> difference between HT-1a and HT-2 residual hypo test? Is one preferable? I'd
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Calling Richard

Kodak HT-1a

Water    200ml
Pot. Permangate 0.3g
Sod. Hydroxide 0.6g
Water to make 250ml

Dilute 1cc stock solution with 124ml water. Drain print wash water
into the solution. If a small amount of fixer is detected the solution
will change colors to violet in about 30 seconds and then clear.

Would I bother with this test ? No. I think Kodak had good reason to
develop HT-2.

==
        John - Photographer & Webmaster
     www.puresilver.org - www.xs750.net
Richard Knoppow - 29 Jan 2006 20:43 GMT
>I want to make sure I'm washing my fiber prints adequately.
>What's the difference between HT-1a and HT-2 residual hypo
>test? Is one preferable? I'd rather go with HT-2 since I
>have silver nitrate on hand and the permanganate in HT-1 is
>supposed to be nasty stuff. The Residual Silver Test test
>for adequate fixing not washing is that correct? THNX.

  HT-1 and HT-1a (slightly modified) the test using
Permanganate, is a very old one and is not considered
adequate. This test measures the amount of hypo in the water
draining off a print or film and does not give an adequate
idea of the amount of hypo remaining, especially in fiber
prints. It was replaced at least fifty years ago by the
silver nitrate test. This is applied to the emulsion but
will also work on the support side. The silver nitrate
reacts with any remaining hypo to form silver sulfide, which
shows up as a yellow or brown stain. Kodak used to publish a
card with stain chips called the Kodak Hypo Estimator for
use with this test (and also the Sodium sulfide test for
residual silver halide). There is a more elaborate version
of the silver nitrate test for use with a densitometer but
the simple test is adequate to check for completeness of
washing.
  Since the test leaves a permanent mark on prints, even
when washing is complete, it is suggested that a test strip
be processed along with the prints for the test.

Here is the formula for the Silver Nitrate test.

Kodak HT-2 Hypo Test Solution

Water                        750.0 ml
Acetic Acid, 28%             125.0 ml
Silver Nitrate                 7.5 grams
Water to make                  1.0 liter

  To test place a drop of two in a clear area of the margin
of the film or paper and allow to stand for about 3 minutes.
Swab off. There should be little or no stain.
  Note, the untreated test spots will darken in the light
so the test should be carried out in subdued light and
comparision made soon after applying the drops.

  A liter of this solution is a lifetime supply. I
recommend making up no more than 50 or 100 ml at a time.
  Because the Silver Nitrate will react with halides in the
water its best to make it up with deionized, or at least
boiled, water. There should be no precipitate when makint it
up.
  The solution should be stored in the dark and will keep
several months.

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

dan.c.quinn@att.net - 29 Jan 2006 22:46 GMT
> I want to make sure I'm washing my fiber prints adequately.

  Search Google from this NG but not this NG for,  turner
horder fixer . A post there from 1991 details a few test
methods. Very interesting.
  From Google search for,  ilford permanganate hypo . That
site has a few very interesting articles.
  Turners' approach I think most interesting. I think it will
work with paper as well as with film. Dan
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.