Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / November 2005
510 Pyro notes
|
|
Thread rating:  |
lew - 31 Oct 2005 16:52 GMT Just sharing this in case anyone's interested.
Mixing was longer and more difficult than I expected, perhaps, due to 2 factors. 1: My phenidone was from a 1gm/50ml stock in denatured alcohol. It took a good while to drive off the smell. 2: the pyro was a little chunky. I spent a good deal of time crushing the chunks in the hot tea before they dissolved. The solution seemed to contain millions of small particles in suspension (or bubbles), I gave up trying to stir until these went away, fortunately they vanished as the solution cooled.
I guestimated a 1:100 dilution would take 11min @68F for HP5+/EI400. Results look a little thin, but I understand this is the 'look' of pyro negs. I primarily use a diffusion head on my enlarger, and I like dense negs in general. Will know better after a few test prints.
-Lew
Gregory Blank - 31 Oct 2005 18:30 GMT > Just sharing this in case anyone's interested. > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > -Lew My pmk negatives never look thin, unless there was a screw up.
 Signature LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
lew - 31 Oct 2005 18:45 GMT Well, they are certainly thinner that the pmk I've done, too. But then again, I didn't use an 'after bath,' as I have with pmk ( but won't in the future as per recent threads in this forum).
>> Just sharing this in case anyone's interested. >> [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > My pmk negatives never look thin, unless there was a screw up. Craig Schroeder - 31 Oct 2005 23:51 GMT I've had quite dense negatives with HP5+ and 510. At 1:100 and 6.5 minutes, I'm getting a normal looking curve and printing on 2 1/2 filters. I believe this is the ballpark area that Jay ended up at. I've only used it a few times and keep getting pulled into other projects but I'll post things that I run into over time. I think Jay was using constant agitation and getting 6 minute sorts of times. I was using 30 second agitations and shooting at 320, incident. The differences in our times, etc make me wonder if something isn't amiss? My negatives don't have an extreme stain and I use TF-4 for fixing any of my pyro or catechol developed stuff. I'll plot some controlled tests and assign some more meaningful data to this as so far, I've only done a few things that weren't real important to just get a general feel for the 510. Maybe Jay can chime in and we can get some info direct from the source!
>Just sharing this in case anyone's interested. > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > >-Lew Craig Schroeder craig nospam craigschroeder com
lew - 01 Nov 2005 01:17 GMT I use t4 also, are you printing with a condenser or diffuser head? Do you think there may be an issue re the purity of the chemicals used? Are there any different formulations of tea around? Your 6.5/hp5 is pretty close to published results for fp4 ( which were the basis of my 11m estimate for hp5/diffuser head). -Lew
> I've had quite dense negatives with HP5+ and 510. At 1:100 and 6.5 > minutes, I'm getting a normal looking curve and printing on 2 1/2 [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > Craig Schroeder > craig nospam craigschroeder com ujazz32@hotmail.com - 01 Nov 2005 09:54 GMT Hi Lew and Craig.
The first question I have is; are you printing on VC paper, or graded paper? A pyro neg that prints with normal contrast on G2 paper will require VC filtration to G5. If you're printing on VC paper, your stained negs should look at least as dense as your unstained negs to print without filtration, and those negs will also print well on Azo G2, and they'll be far too contrasty for grade 2 enlarging paper.
510-Pyro gives full film speed, or better, so if you normally derate your film by one stop to ensure good shadow detail, you'll probably overexpose for development in 510-Pyro, which leads to dense shadows and flat negs with normal development. I recommend that you begin your testing by rating your film at box speed, and finding normal development time for that speed. You might still find that your shadows are too dense, resulting in flat negs. If so, try increasing your EI by 1/3 stop until you get good blacks in your prints.
I standardize my development at 70F. Pyro developers harden the emulsion of the film, making higher temps practical, and safe.
If you substituted your alcohol/phenidone solution for part of the total volume of TEA, that represents a 12.5% reduction in TEA, which will reduce the pH of your working solution, and might well require extended development times. Chunky pyro suggests the presence of humidity, which could oxidise the pyro, and degrade the potency of your developer. Was the pyro white and fluffy, apart from the chunks, or was it brownish?
My times are very much in line with Craig's, and my BTZS curves suggest that 11 ½ minutes @70F with continuous agitation, should give a CI of about .76 with VC paper, and about .92 with graded paper.
Lew,
don't fret over this. Even if your developer was a total loss, it's only a few grams of pyro and ascorbic acid, and a few ml of TEA. If your pyro was degraded, and your alcohol displaced some of the TEA, your developer might require extended development times compared to a standard batch, but it will still work. If you don't want to waste your time finding development times for a developer that you won't make again, use it 1:20 with 30g/liter of sodium sulfite for a paper developer, and make a new batch of 510-Pyro without the alcohol, and with fresh pyro. I hope your negs print better than you expect, and please let me know if I can be of any help.
Jay
lew - 01 Nov 2005 12:32 GMT Thanks, Jay: My pyro is a little off - white, so I'll extend the dev time. What's your opinion re increasing concentration (eg 1.5:100)? Also, wouldn't the alcohol have been driven off during heating/mixing? Embarrassingly, I haven't got to the prints yet. -Lew Hi Lew and Craig.
The first question I have is; are you printing on VC paper, or graded paper? A pyro neg that prints with normal contrast on G2 paper will require VC filtration to G5. If you're printing on VC paper, your stained negs should look at least as dense as your unstained negs to print without filtration, and those negs will also print well on Azo G2, and they'll be far too contrasty for grade 2 enlarging paper.
510-Pyro gives full film speed, or better, so if you normally derate your film by one stop to ensure good shadow detail, you'll probably overexpose for development in 510-Pyro, which leads to dense shadows and flat negs with normal development. I recommend that you begin your testing by rating your film at box speed, and finding normal development time for that speed. You might still find that your shadows are too dense, resulting in flat negs. If so, try increasing your EI by 1/3 stop until you get good blacks in your prints.
I standardize my development at 70F. Pyro developers harden the emulsion of the film, making higher temps practical, and safe.
If you substituted your alcohol/phenidone solution for part of the total volume of TEA, that represents a 12.5% reduction in TEA, which will reduce the pH of your working solution, and might well require extended development times. Chunky pyro suggests the presence of humidity, which could oxidise the pyro, and degrade the potency of your developer. Was the pyro white and fluffy, apart from the chunks, or was it brownish?
My times are very much in line with Craig's, and my BTZS curves suggest that 11 ½ minutes @70F with continuous agitation, should give a CI of about .76 with VC paper, and about .92 with graded paper.
Lew,
don't fret over this. Even if your developer was a total loss, it's only a few grams of pyro and ascorbic acid, and a few ml of TEA. If your pyro was degraded, and your alcohol displaced some of the TEA, your developer might require extended development times compared to a standard batch, but it will still work. If you don't want to waste your time finding development times for a developer that you won't make again, use it 1:20 with 30g/liter of sodium sulfite for a paper developer, and make a new batch of 510-Pyro without the alcohol, and with fresh pyro. I hope your negs print better than you expect, and please let me know if I can be of any help.
Jay
lew - 01 Nov 2005 13:10 GMT Also, any chance of bumping up the ph or getting more pyro into the mix? -Lew
PATRICK GAINER - 01 Nov 2005 13:57 GMT >Also, any chance of bumping up the ph or getting more pyro into the mix? >-Lew > > TEA comes in (at least) 2 grades. The commercial grade as produced by Dow has about 15% diethanolamine which actually increases the pH of a given % dilution. The grade you will get from The Chemistry Store is 99% as would be used in cosmetics, etc.
I'm not sure that the heating drives of all the alcohol, even though the temperature is above the alcohol boiling point. Phenidone can be dissolved in TEA to form a stock solution, which would eliminate the question. I am not averse to using 1/4 tsp of phenidone as 1/2 gram. So far as I know, noone has done a sensitivity analysis to see how critical the measurements are to this developer. Some years ago I did such an analysis for D-76 (Petersen's Photographic, April 1973, "Kitchen Tested Soups" ) that showed that + or - 1/8 tsp of the metol and/or hydroquinone in a quart of D-76 would have no appreciable effect on development.
ujazz32@hotmail.com - 01 Nov 2005 20:16 GMT Lew,
I wouldn't worry about trying to adjust your developer at this point. It is what it is, and will remain so until it's used up, so I recommend that you simply adjust your development times to suit.
Hi Pat.
It's good to see your posts, as I always learn something from them. Where would one find the commercial grade of TEA produced by DOW? What kind of pH increase could one expect by substituting the comercial grade for the cosmetic grade? Are you enjoying the fall colors? I hope all is well at your house.
Jay
PATRICK GAINER - 02 Nov 2005 01:19 GMT >Lew, > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > I don't know where you might buy it. I doubt that Dow would sell you any less than a tanker full. All the spec sheets you would ever want and more are at the Dow chemical website, which IIRC is www.dow.com. There will be a PDF file with MEA, DEA and TEA that you can download. If you can't find the commercial grade, you should be able to simulate it if you can find diethanolamine. pH varies with concentration, of course, and where the pH of the tech grade is 10, the pH of the commercial grade is about 11. MEA has even higher pH, but is more hazardous.
Doing well, thanks. Would do even better if I were rich. We usually have brilliant fall colors here. A lot depends on when the first frost comes.
PATRICK GAINER - 02 Nov 2005 21:33 GMT >> Lew, >> [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > have brilliant fall colors here. A lot depends on when the first frost > comes. Sorry. I was thinking off the top of my head. The commercial TEA is only about 1/2 pH unit different from the 99% pure all the way along the curve. DEA is better than 1 pH unit greater that the 99% stuff. Best check out the PDF from Dow .
PATRICK GAINER - 03 Nov 2005 06:10 GMT >Lew, > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > I could not find any reasonable price for DEA, unless you call $76 for 500 ml reasonable. I think this is reagent grade, which we don't need. The change in pH from one grade of TEA to the other is not enough to make a difference. DEA would give about 1.25 more pH units than TEA at any dilution, but I would just as soon dissolve the developing agents in glycol for part A and use an inorganic alkali in part B to get any desired pH as pay the asking price for DEA.
lew - 01 Nov 2005 23:47 GMT My TEA is, in fact from the Chemistry Store, but it's way more viscous than the TEA shipped by the Formulary with their 777 kit. Anyhow would a few grains of NAOH dissolve in the TEA? -Lew
> Also, any chance of bumping up the ph or getting more pyro into the mix? > -Lew ujazz32@hotmail.com - 02 Nov 2005 00:14 GMT Hi Lew.
No, NaOH is not soluble in TEA. Like I said, I wouldn't bother trying to adjust your developer. It will work as-is, with the appropriate adjustment to developing time or dilution, etc.
Jay
PATRICK GAINER - 02 Nov 2005 01:22 GMT >Hi Lew. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > It would be better to adjust the pH in the working solution. You could make a strong solution of either sodium or potassium carbonate and try adding a few ml just before developing.
Gregory Blank - 02 Nov 2005 01:42 GMT In article <4367ffa0_2@news.vic.com>, PATRICK GAINER <pgainer@rtol.net> wrote:\
> It would be better to adjust the pH in the working solution. You could > make a strong solution of either sodium or potassium carbonate and try > adding a few ml just before developing. Thats about what I do with pmk I adjust the ph-and contrast by adding more metaborate.
 Signature LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
|
|
|