Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Temperature and Technique

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
semnews@webhearth.com - 22 Aug 2005 18:10 GMT
Hello,

Thank you all for your help on my last question.

I've been developing for a couple months now and I have a few questions
regarding temperature, if you don't mind.

1) If I develop with the chemicals at 24C instead of 20C, and I make
the correct adjustment as suggested by the film manufacturer, will
there be ANY difference in the result? I live in Texas where 20C takes
a little doing, but I wouldn't want to have worse quality negatives by
adjusting upward.

2) The way I have been getting to 20C is as follows. I use D76 1:1.
Room temperature is about 78F, so I cool 10oz of water to 58F in the
freezer, and mix the chemical, resulting in 68 (I might adjust a little
cooler to give myself some time, obviously). Are there any big
disadvantages to this method, ie could it negatively impact my
development?

3) This isn't related to temperature, but on Ilford's website they have
a guide to darkroom technique, and I noticed something that intrigued
me. They suggest that after getting the leader out of the 35mm
cassette, the spool be returned there and wound onto the reel from the
cassette, to avoid letting the spool drop on the floor / get dusty,
etc.

Now this quite appeals to me (I've been having dust problems --
possibly the subject of a later post if it doesn't improve -- and in
general don't know what to do with the spool while I'm winding), but
I'm concerned because I bulk load my film and doing it this way would
be passing it through the felt one more time and giving another
opportunity for scratches. Does anybody have experience/advice
regarding this method?

Many thanks!
Stephen
Ken Hart - 22 Aug 2005 20:40 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> a little doing, but I wouldn't want to have worse quality negatives by
> adjusting upward.

Probably sholdn't make any difference if you are properly adjusting the time
for the temp. If you stay within the manufacturer's recommendations, you
shoul get the results that the manaufacturer planned for.

> 2) The way I have been getting to 20C is as follows. I use D76 1:1.
> Room temperature is about 78F, so I cool 10oz of water to 58F in the
> freezer, and mix the chemical, resulting in 68 (I might adjust a little
> cooler to give myself some time, obviously). Are there any big
> disadvantages to this method, ie could it negatively impact my
> development?

This will work-- you're not extremely cooling or heating anything. But my
question is, what about the other chemicals? For best results, everything
should be at the same temp. I suggest you get a cheap 'foam cooler (possibly
cut it down to maybe 5-6" depth) and fill it with ice/water to get all your
chems to the right temp. Between agitation, put the film tank in the cooler.
I have a water bath with heater and thermostat for developing color film
(100F degrees).

> 3) This isn't related to temperature, but on Ilford's website they have
> a guide to darkroom technique, and I noticed something that intrigued
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> opportunity for scratches. Does anybody have experience/advice
> regarding this method?

I like to load 35mm film starting from the spool end, because it's already
cut straight and IMHO, easier to clip into the film reel (I use statinless
steel reels which load from the center out). As for the end of the film
dropping on the floor, how tall are you? For me, it's only a possible issue
with 36 exposure film. I think the bigger issue is where is the dust coming
from? There are a lot of thngs you can do about dust, depending on your
darkroom.

Signature

Ken Hart
kwhart@aec.nu

PATRICK GAINER - 22 Aug 2005 20:43 GMT
>Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
>  

I frequently shoot a whole roll for test purposes and pull out a short
piece for a test. I have also pulled the whole roll out for development
upon occasion. I have also dropped the whole mess on the darkroom floor
after I took it out of the cartridge. never did find it in the dark.  I
haven't seen any scratches. I think that if you don't get any the first
time through, you won't get any the second as long as you make sure
there isn't a piece of sand stuck in the felt. If you're worried about
dropping. get a small dishpan or the like and load your tank directly
above it. Then you can remove the folm from the cartridge all at once or
not, as the spirit moves.
dan.c.quinn@att.net - 22 Aug 2005 23:17 GMT
> If I develop with the chemicals at 24C instead of 20C,
> Many thanks!  Stephen

 Try a clip fan. Place all chemistry in a shallow pan
of water and let evaporative cooling do the job. I usually
process at 72 to 75 F. Dan
Richard Knoppow - 23 Aug 2005 00:53 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> negatives by
> adjusting upward.

  There shouldn't be any difference. 68F is  standard for
historical, not chemical, reasons. sixty five years ago few
films would stand processing at much higher temperatures
without damage to the emulsion. Modern films, even fairly
soft ones like Tri-X and some Ilford films, will take much
higher temperatures. 24C/75F is well within the range. Some
very old books suggest that high temperature processing
produces more grain. This might have been the case where
soft gelatin was used in the emulsion because it might have
allowed some "grain clumping", modern emulsions are
generally too hard for this to happen.

> 2) The way I have been getting to 20C is as follows. I use
> D76 1:1.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> impact my
> development?

  Sounds fine to me although a tempering bath for all the
solutions is also a good practice.
  BTW, the old advice about keeping all solution
temperatures within a degree or so of each other is also a
hangover from the days when it was easy to reticulate the
emulsion. Its now hard to do even delibrately as a special
effect.

> 3) This isn't related to temperature, but on Ilford's
> website they have
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> get dusty,
> etc.

   I'm not sure I understand this. My technique for 35mm
film is to load directly from the cassette spool. I trim the
loading tongue off the end of the film and wind it on the
reel, cutting or pulling it off the tape at the other end.
Mostly I use bulk loaded cassettes. For Kodak cassettes the
technique is the same except that one must open the cassette
wity a bottle opener. Its also possible to re-use these
cassettes by using a leader retriever (you can make one from
35mm film scraps) to pull the film out of the closed
cassette. One cuts it off leaving a small tongue to which
the new film can be fastened with a bit of tape.
  I use old Nikor stainless steel tanks.

> Now this quite appeals to me (I've been having dust
> problems --
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> experience/advice
> regarding this method?

  See above, it seems unnecessary.

> Many thanks!
> Stephen

BTW, Los Angeles is also a high temperature area. Its over
80F right now and the tap water, after letting it run for a
few minutes, is around 77F. I've had it come out at over
80F.

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

Mike King - 23 Aug 2005 03:25 GMT
I think the "excessive grain" at high temps in the old days could have
several causes.  Overdevelopment (the active ingredients in some developers
have equal increases in activity over a fairly short range of
temperature--outside that range the "fine grain" ingredients may not get the
same energy boost by increasing temp as say the "speed" ingredients.  So
your D-76 is suddenly acting more like D-19 or D-8! and reticulation (which
may have been mistaken for grain on contact prints).

2.  It certainly is hard to reticulate Delta, TMax or Tri-X films, can the
same be said for "modern" Eastern European, Russian, Chinese and Indian
films with any certainty?  When in doubt I recommend a conservative
approach.

As far as "3" some fellows don't rewind their leaders, they then can cut the
tongue of the film off straight and use the film cartridge as a film loading
aid.

Signature

darkroommike

----------

>
> > Hello,
[quoted text clipped - 95 lines]
> few minutes, is around 77F. I've had it come out at over
> 80F.
Peter Irwin - 23 Aug 2005 04:21 GMT
> 2.  It certainly is hard to reticulate Delta, TMax or Tri-X films, can the
> same be said for "modern" Eastern European, Russian, Chinese and Indian
> films with any certainty?  When in doubt I recommend a conservative
> approach.

I've managed to reticulate Ilford HP5 (twice) by running a tap of what
I thought was carefully temperature balanced water for washing,
but which turned out to have way too much hot in the mix when
I came back 15-20 minutes later.

I've switched to using HCA and washing with the cold water tap
only if I am going to leave the darkroom while the film is washed.
As I understand it, cold water is normally not very effective at
washing films and paper, but when Hypo Clearing Agent is used,
cold water is almost as good as 20c water.

There is a back coating of clear gelatin on Maco PO-100 which
is far less tolerant of warm water than the emulsion side.

Peter.
Signature

pirwin@ktb.net

semnews@webhearth.com - 26 Aug 2005 06:23 GMT
Many thanks, to you and all who responded. I should have mentioned that
I do cool the other chemicals too, I just didn't think to mention that
right now. I will try the water bath though.

Thanks,
Stephen
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.