Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Two Clears and a Pink? TMAX In XTOL

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Alan Smithee - 23 May 2005 22:59 GMT
A couple of days ago I processed three rolls of 35mm film in XTOL. The first
roll in the tank was TMAX 100 (TMX) the next two were TMAX 400 (TMY). They
were all developed at 9 minutes in XTOL 1:1, Stopped, Fixed for 10 minutes,
rinsed for 1 minutes, HCA for 1 minute and rinsed for another 5 minutes. The
two rolls of TMY 400 came out completely clear while the TMX 100 was still
pink, what's with that?
glaserp@sustainsoft.com - 23 May 2005 23:48 GMT
Hi Alan,

You and I have stumbled across the same issue. Please see the thread
that has been evolving for the past few days. I think the essence of
the thing is to use a two-bath fixing process. Follow on here:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.photo.darkroom/browse_frm/thread/131d7b8
fe7b37a1f/ea5693a7fdedf97f?hl=en#ea5693a7fdedf97f

Alan Smithee - 24 May 2005 06:23 GMT
> Hi Alan,
>
> You and I have stumbled across the same issue. Please see the thread
> that has been evolving for the past few days. I think the essence of
> the thing is to use a two-bath fixing process. Follow on here:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.photo.darkroom/browse_frm/thread/131d7b8
fe7b37a1f/ea5693a7fdedf97f?hl=en#ea5693a7fdedf97f


After reading the post from Dr. Bob in that thread I think the explanation
may be poor rinsing on my part. The TMX was at the bottom of the tank and
the least likely to receive a rush of clean water. The pink dye is suppose
to be removed by the developer by his account, which puzzles me. I ended up
refixing and HCAing that roll two or three times before the dye finally went
away. It eventually did clear however.
Richard Knoppow - 24 May 2005 22:52 GMT
>> Hi Alan,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> the dye finally went
> away. It eventually did clear however.

  Developer does not remove the sensitizing dye that
results in the pink or magenta stain on T-Max film. The
stain is due to a dye which is persistent and is bound to
the gelatin and to silver in the gelatin. If the film is not
completely fixed the dye will remain because the complexes
it binds to remain.
  Films like T-Max and Tri-X which have a large amount of
Silver iodide in them are slow to fix. The iodide acts as a
restrainer on the fixing. Rapid (ammonium thiosulfate) fixer
is less affected by the soluble iodide so it continues to
fix at a faster rate even after accumulating iodide. Using
rapid fixer is a good practice for these slow to fix films.
  A two bath fixing regieme helps to overcome both the
accumulation of iodide and also the accumulation of
thiosulfate ions which are complexed with fixed out silver
halide. It takes a lot of free thiosulfate to produce
complete fixing and the capacity of a single bath, even of
rapid fixer, is quite limited. Because most of the silver
and most of the iodide accumulates in the first bath of a
two bath syetem the second bath is left in a condition where
it fixes at full rate and has enough free thiosulfate to
fully complex any remaining halide. This also tends to
reduce the amount of sensitizing dye bound to the emulsion.
The use of a sulfite wash aid further releases bound
silver-thiosulfate complexes and also the dye bound to them.
One minute is probably not long enough, probably two minutes
is about right.
  Check the clearing time of the film you are going to fix
in the type of fixer you are going to use. The fixing time
can be established by this. Soak a sample of the film in
plain water for a few minutes because the fixing rate of
wetted film is different than dry film. Then fix until the
film is visually clear (not turbid from halide), it may
still have stain at this point. Fixing should be at least
twice this time. If a two bath system is used fix in the
first bath for the clearing time and in the second bath for
an equal time.
 Film can be tested for excessive retained silver and
silver complexes by a simple test using either a 2% solution
of Sodium Sulfide (not sulfite) or a 1:9 dilution of Kodak
Rapid Selenium Toner. The toner test has the advantage of
being stable for a long time and free of the rotten egg odor
of the sulfide. However, it fails if there is much hypo in
the material so it can be used only on well washed film or
paper. Place a drop or two of the test on a clear area of
the film or paper. The film or paper should be wet but the
surface should be blotted or squeegeed off. leave the test
solution in place for about 2 minutes and rinse it off. It
should leave no stain at all. Place film against a white
surface to make any stain more visible. If there is any
yellow or brown stain it indicates that fixing is not
complete.
 I have no idea why T-Max 100 should be harder to fix than
T-Max 400 but perhaps it is.

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

Frank Pittel - 28 May 2005 09:44 GMT
: >> Hi Alan,
: >>
[quoted text clipped - 73 lines]
:   I have no idea why T-Max 100 should be harder to fix than
: T-Max 400 but perhaps it is.

Fascinating as always!! I tried using a two stage fix but
decided against it because it takes to much effort. :-)
As you suggested I use Kodak's rapid fixer and fix for ~5
minutes. The time is an aprocimation because I only measure time
for development accuratly. I do always error on the side of extending
the fix for as long as a minute.

If after ~5 minutes of fix and 15 minutes of washing with ~80 degree
water there's any pink left in the negative I discard the fixer as
exhausted and refix with fresh fixer. I developed this process back in
the day when I would check the fixer with hypo check after each use.
With time I noticed that if the pink was still there after washing the
fix checked out exhausted.

I stoped using the two stage fix ( I use a Jobo processor and it seems
more like stages then baths. :-)) when I noticed that a gallon of fixer
would fix about the same amount of film irregardless of which system I
used and a single stage fix requires less work on my part! :-)

Signature

Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------
fwp@deepthought.com

Rod Smith - 23 May 2005 23:49 GMT
> A couple of days ago I processed three rolls of 35mm film in XTOL. The first
> roll in the tank was TMAX 100 (TMX) the next two were TMAX 400 (TMY). They
> were all developed at 9 minutes in XTOL 1:1, Stopped, Fixed for 10 minutes,
> rinsed for 1 minutes, HCA for 1 minute and rinsed for another 5 minutes. The
> two rolls of TMY 400 came out completely clear while the TMX 100 was still
> pink, what's with that?

TMX includes a pink dye. If you search Google Groups on "pink TMX" you'll
see lots of reports of this sort of thing; apparently it can be pretty
tough to wash out. AFAIK, the problem has nothing to do with the
developer. Most posts suggest longer fixing and/or hypo clear stages as a
solution, or using fresher fixer -- T-grain films in general tend to
exhaust fixer faster than most other films. Your 10-minute fix sounds like
it should be long enough with any but exhausted fixer. Perhaps your fixer
WAS exhausted, though, or perhaps you should try boosting the hypo clear
time. I don't shoot a lot of TMX, though, so I haven't paid a lot of
attention to this issue and don't remember all the details.

Signature

Rod Smith, rodsmith@rodsbooks.com
http://www.rodsbooks.com
Author of books on Linux, FreeBSD, and networking

Alan Smithee - 24 May 2005 06:28 GMT
> > A couple of days ago I processed three rolls of 35mm film in XTOL. The first
> > roll in the tank was TMAX 100 (TMX) the next two were TMAX 400 (TMY). They
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> time. I don't shoot a lot of TMX, though, so I haven't paid a lot of
> attention to this issue and don't remember all the details.

I just find it weird that the two rolls of 400 were fine and the 100 was
still pink. The processing was identical. Is the dye that much stronger in
TMX I guess is the question. The fixer was fresh in this case.
dan.c.quinn@att.net - 24 May 2005 23:08 GMT
> TMX includes a pink dye.

 Period? That is not my understanding. As Dr. Bob has mentioned,
a sensitizer, which is in intimate contact with the silver halides
is, at least on processing, pink. It is a sensitizer which likely
just happens to be pink.
 It is possible though that the sensitizer has been formulated to
be pink. Whether by design or by chance, that color is an indicator
of the presence of silver halid in the emulsion. Color indicators can
be very, very, sensitive. The most minute amount of silver halide
left in the emulsion could cause that 'pink'.
  I produced two, a very and not so very, pink Pan F+ 120 rolls
while testing for the least fixer needed to completely fix. I think
it very possible that ALL the usual films will show pink if silver
halide remains in the emulsion.
  Perhaps the OP with TMX encountered the very hardened nature
of that film's emulsion. Hardened emulsions slow solution penetration.
An HCA solution lifts the ph some over the usual acid fix and swells
the emulsion allowing solutions easier access. Also, HCA has a
slight solvent action with silver halids.
  For quicker results a neutral to alkaline fix with an after
rinse in Agfa's suggested sodium carbonate hca should work.
  As for myself, I'll stick with the unadulterated, one-shot, very
dilute fixer I now use. If one wishes to try a S. Thio. version put
30 grams of the penta or 20 grams of the anhydrous in the amount
of solution needed then test an unexposed roll. Dan
Richard Knoppow - 30 May 2005 00:09 GMT
>> TMX includes a pink dye.
>
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> amount
> of solution needed then test an unexposed roll. Dan

 This isn't quite how it works. First, emulsion hardness is
a measure of the amount it swells. Swelling can be caused by
heat or by being more alkaline or more acid than the
isoelectric point of the gelatin. Gelatin is amphoretic,
that is, it is neither acid or alkaline but has some of the
characteristics of both. Gelatin has a sort of preferred pH
called the isoelecric point. The isoelectric point is
determined by the way the gelatin is processed. Most
photographic gelatin is acid processed and has an
isoelectric point slightly on the acid side of neutral. When
gelatin is immersed in a bath it takes on the pH of that
bath. At the isoelectric point the net electric charges in
the gelatin are neutral, on either side there is a net
charge. This is important because some ions are held to the
gelatin by their relative charges, as in like charges repel,
opposite charges attract. When gelatin is on the acid side
of its isoelectric point it tends to bind thiosulfate and
silver complexes. By treating the emulsion in a neutral or
alkaline bath the pH is moved above on the alkaline side)
the isoelectric point and the charges then tend to repel the
adsorbed ions, accelerating washing. One purpose of a
sulfite wash aid is to provide this pH adjustment. Any
alkali will provide this effect. In the past several
materials have been recommended: Agfa recommends a 2%
solution of sodium carbonate, in the past Kodak recommended
a 2% solution of Ammonium carbonate (because the Ammonium
came out faster in washing). One can also use Sodium
Metaborate (Kodalk), or even Borax.
  Another reason for using an alkaline bath before washing
is to eliminate the mordanting effect of white alum hardener
in hardening fixing baths. The alum has a specific binding
effect on thiosulfate and silver complexes. This binding
takes place over a range of pH from acid to about neutra. By
making the gelatin alkaline the binding effect is eliminated
resulting is a substantial increase in washing rate.
However, at the pH of the above treatments the cross linking
that results in hardening is destroyed.
  Kodak Hypo Clearing Agent employs Sodium sulfite. The
sulifte acts as an alkali but it also has another function.
Sulfite turns out to be an effective ion exchanger for
thiosulfate and thiosulfate-silver complexes. The sulfite
actually displaces these ions but is not bound the either
the gelatin or image silver itself.
  KHCA is buffered to neutral pH. Kodak gives two reasons
for this: First, at neural pH the emulsion is above its
isoelectric point so there is no longer binding by charge,
it is also above the pH at which alum hardener binds ions.
However, at neutral the hardening caused by the hardener is
substantially intact. Another reason is that at neutral pH
the emulsion is close to its isoelectric point, which is
also the point of _minimum_ swelling. At this point the
diffusion path which must be taken by ions leaving the
emulsion in the wash is also minimised.
 I should point out that gelatin hardness has little if any
effect on diffusion rate. Swelling can, but as indicated,
diffusion is greatest when swelling is minimum. If you think
of the emulsion as a sponge this will make sense. A
compacted sponge will absorb more water than a swelled one.
Something similar happens with the gelatin of the emulsion.
  T-Max and some other films, including Tri-X are slow to
fix partly because they contain a lot of silver iodide.
Three forms of silver halide are used in emulsions: Silver
chloride, silver Bromide, and Silver Iodide. Silver chloride
is very slow and is found mostly as a component in printing
paper. Silver bromide is faster and found in both paper and
as the basic form of silver halide in film. In addition most
films have a substantial amount of Silver Iodide, which is
important in producing film speed. These three are, of
course, in soluble in water in the form they take in the
film. They are made soluble by the fixing bath. The fastest
to fix out is chloride, the next fastest is bromide, the
slowest is iodide. Iodide is very slow to fix compared to
the others. In addition the free iodide ions act as a
restrainer to the fixing bath slowing it down even more.
Iodide has a much greater restraining effect on Sodium
Thiosulfate fixer than on Ammonium thiosulfate (rapid)
fixer. This is one reason that rapid fixers are recommended
for films of all types but especially for high iodide films
shuch as T-Max, Delta, and Tri-X, which tend to fix out very
slowly in sodium fixing baths. While the main limit to fixer
capacity is the amount of free thiosulfate ions, in other
words by the amount of thiosulfate bound up with dissolved
silver, the amount of dissolved iodide is also important.
Since it has less effect on ammonium thiosulfate fixer than
on sodium the relative capacity of the rapid fixer is
greater. It takes a lot of free thiosulfate to convert the
halide into fully soluble form, three thiosulfate ions for
each halide ion.
  Residual dye: T-Max and Delta films have a sensitizing
dye which seems to be persistent. Sensitizing dyes are added
to the emulsion mostly to sensitise it to color. The basic
emulsion is sensitive to near UV, blue, and blue green (for
Iodide). To get sensitivity in the green and red regions of
the spectrum a dye or combination of dyes are added. These
dyes are usually removed or decolorized in the deloper but
it appears that the dyes used in T-Max are not, or else are
bound in some way by somthing else in the emulsion. The dye
is definitely not a delibrate addition to indicate the state
of fixing. Likely, the dye is bound by the same mechanisms
that bind thiosulfate and complexes, namely the electric
charges in the emulsion. It appears that any treatment which
eliminates this binding will also free the residual dye.
Certainly KHCA causes it to be released.
  Note that the washing time for film recommended after
using a standard hardening fixing bath is half an hour at
around 68F. After using KHCA a five minute wash is enough.
This is indictative of the effectiveness of both the
modification of the pH and the ion exchange efffect.
  Residual silver halide:  It is possible to test the level
of residual silver halide and silver complexes produced by
the fixer in film or paper. The standard test is a 2%
solution of Sodium Sulfide (not sulfite) for well washed
film or paper a 1:9 dilution of Kodak Rapid Selenium Toner
can be used in place of the sulfide. It is more stable and
does not have the rotten egg odor of the sulfide. However,
it fails where there is an excess of hypo in the emulsion.
 To use either solution place a couple of drops in a clear
area of the film or paper. Allow to stand for about 2 to 3
minutes. The rinse off. There should be no visible stain.
Film should be held against a white surface to make any
stain more visible. If there is any residual halide or
reaction products they will cause a yellow or brown stain.
This is really the ultimate test of fixing.

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

UC - 24 May 2005 03:22 GMT
> A couple of days ago I processed three rolls of 35mm film in XTOL. The first
> roll in the tank was TMAX 100 (TMX) the next two were TMAX 400 (TMY). They
> were all developed at 9 minutes in XTOL 1:1, Stopped, Fixed for 10 minutes,
> rinsed for 1 minutes, HCA for 1 minute and rinsed for another 5 minutes. The
> two rolls of TMY 400 came out completely clear while the TMX 100 was still
> pink, what's with that?

Was it RAPID FIXER? Use ONLY rapid fixer!
Alan Smithee - 24 May 2005 06:33 GMT
> > A couple of days ago I processed three rolls of 35mm film in XTOL.
> The first
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Was it RAPID FIXER? Use ONLY rapid fixer!

I don't think the fix was the problem as I didn't see any fogging or haze on
any of the negatives. The fix was also fresh in this case.
UC - 24 May 2005 14:27 GMT
DON'T USE ANYTHING BUT RAPID FIXER!

> > > A couple of days ago I processed three rolls of 35mm film in XTOL.
> > The first
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> I don't think the fix was the problem as I didn't see any fogging or haze on
> any of the negatives. The fix was also fresh in this case.
Alan Smithee - 24 May 2005 06:40 GMT
> > A couple of days ago I processed three rolls of 35mm film in XTOL.
> The first
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Was it RAPID FIXER? Use ONLY rapid fixer!

I think I may start using Rapid Fix as well. Thx. Seems to be some
analytical evidence that it works better, chemically, on these types of
films.
Bernie - 24 May 2005 04:49 GMT
TMX 100, more grains, although smaller than the ones in TMY 400, hence more
sensitizing dye and more pink left over after the process. In addition to
fresher or two-bath fix, I would suggest more than just one minute in HCA,
and increase the wash time time or make sure you use a good flow of water,
not just a rinse.

>A couple of days ago I processed three rolls of 35mm film in XTOL. The
>first
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> two rolls of TMY 400 came out completely clear while the TMX 100 was still
> pink, what's with that?
Alan Smithee - 24 May 2005 06:34 GMT
> TMX 100, more grains, although smaller than the ones in TMY 400, hence more
> sensitizing dye and more pink left over after the process. In addition to
> fresher or two-bath fix, I would suggest more than just one minute in HCA,
> and increase the wash time time or make sure you use a good flow of water,
> not just a rinse.

I think poor water flow may be the culprit. Perhaps I was getting the bottom
of the tank completely washed. Thx.

> >A couple of days ago I processed three rolls of 35mm film in XTOL. The
> >first
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> > two rolls of TMY 400 came out completely clear while the TMX 100 was still
> > pink, what's with that?
Richard Knoppow - 30 May 2005 00:09 GMT
>> TMX 100, more grains, although smaller than the ones in
>> TMY 400, hence
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> getting the bottom
> of the tank completely washed. Thx.

  If you are washing in a multiple roll tank, like the old
tall Nikor tanks, stick a hose down the center of the reels
and feed the water from that. The tank makes a very
efficient washer that way. Water flowing onto the top of the
tank will not usually get down to the bottom. If you can't
rig a hose fitting fix a section of hose to the bottom of a
funnel and run the faucet into that.

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

Richard Knoppow - 29 May 2005 23:24 GMT
> TMX 100, more grains, although smaller than the ones in
> TMY 400, hence more sensitizing dye and more pink left
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>> TMX 100 was still
>> pink, what's with that?

 Kodak recommends 1 to 2 minutes for film in KHCA. In my
experience a 2 minute treatment will remove all the residual
dye. The used KHCA comes out light purple.
 I've been using up a supply of very old T-Max 400 lately.
This stuff is at least 10 years old, perhaps older. The
curious thing is that it fixes out completely in sodium
thiosulfate fixer in a total of 10-12 minutes in a two bath
system and has no residual dye stain right from the fixer. I
vaguely remember that it did have stain when it was new but
I'm not sure. Perhaps something happens to the dye with age.
I've asked a friend at Kodak to try to track this down.
  BTW, the film worked fine. Slightly elevated fog but not
bad. This despite having been referigerated for only part of
its storage time.

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

Lloyd Erlick - 30 May 2005 13:36 GMT
...
>  Kodak recommends 1 to 2 minutes for film in KHCA. In my
>experience a 2 minute treatment will remove all the residual
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>bad. This despite having been referigerated for only part of
>its storage time.
...

may3005 from Lloyd Erlick,

I can't prove this, and I'm not exactly an
authority on color either, but I think the
color that comes out of TMY (T-Max 400)
during processing has not been consistent
over the years. I think Kodak has made
changes in that regard over time, and since
the film is ten years old it may have
different characteristics.

In a slightly different vein, I have stored
exposed rolls of TMY for up to three years
before processing. I have never found any
difference from promptly developed film in
the resulting negatives when I make prints
from them.

Also, I have been using exactly the fixing
regimen you mention (sodium thiosulfate, two
bath fixer, six minutes in each bath -- I
agitate constantly in the fix) for years. I
also see no residual dye stain right from the
fixer, unless I have been extremely sloppy
and over-used the fixer. I think a healthy
fixer is very important.

regards,
--le
Signature

________________________________
Lloyd Erlick Portraits, Toronto.
voice: 416-686-0326
email: portrait@heylloyd.com
net: www.heylloyd.com
________________________________

Nicholas O. Lindan - 30 May 2005 16:00 GMT
>   Kodak recommends 1 to 2 minutes for film in KHCA. In my
> experience a 2 minute treatment will remove all the residual
> dye.

I have found the temperature of the HCA (HEICO, in my case)
and wash water has a lot of influence on getting the pink
out.

At 75F the pink washes right out with no problem.  At 65F
and below (think Cleveland winters and the price of natural
gas) the pink stays in.

Signature

Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Consulting Engineer:  Electronics; Informatics; Photonics.
To reply, remove spaces: n o lindan at ix  . netcom . com
psst.. want to buy an f-stop timer? nolindan.com/da/fstop/

dan.c.quinn@att.net - 31 May 2005 22:34 GMT
> I have found the temperature of the HCA (HEICO, in my case)
> and wash water has a lot of influence on getting the pink
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> and below (think Cleveland winters and the price of natural
> gas) the pink stays in.

 Via Google I found a study dealing with film washing.
Potassium Permanganate was used to test the wash water. A
test done with, IIRC, 75F wash water disclosed the presence
of thiosulfate where the 68F test showed none.
 The Ilford film wash sequence was under study. Dan
Richard Knoppow - 01 Jun 2005 05:49 GMT
>> I have found the temperature of the HCA (HEICO, in my
>> case)
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> of thiosulfate where the 68F test showed none.
>  The Ilford film wash sequence was under study. Dan

  Kodak did testing of fixing and washing at various
temperatures decades ago. Washing is accelerated by wash
water temperature. Below about 65F washing is very slow
unless a sulfite wash aid is used. The wash aid results in
reasonable washing rates down to about 50F.
  The Pemanganate test is an old one. It measures the
amount of thiosulfate in the water coming out of the paper.
Since the diffusion rate is much slower at 65F than at 75F
its not surprizing that the test would show much less hypo
in the water. The Permanganate test was supplanted in the
late 1940's by other methods, in particular the Silver
nitrate test and the Methylene Blue test both of which
measure the level of residual hypo actually in the emulsion
and paper. The Permanganate test is probably valid for
measuring the rate at which hypo is able to diffuse out of
the paper but it is not a good test for the effectivness of
washing, i.e., the level of residual hypo in the emulsion.

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

dan.c.quinn@att.net - 02 Jun 2005 00:11 GMT
> ... Washing is accelerated by wash water temperature.
> Below about 65F washing is very slow

 So, washing is faster at 75F then at 65F. I'd think
the warmer water acting on the emulsion would cause the
gelatine to swell some little. But what of that longer
"diffusion path" which results? I've seen so often
mentioned the slow downs in washing due to a
longer "diffusion path"
 Search this NG for, diffusion path . Dan
Richard Knoppow - 11 Jun 2005 18:22 GMT
>> ... Washing is accelerated by wash water temperature.
>> Below about 65F washing is very slow
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> longer "diffusion path"
>  Search this NG for, diffusion path . Dan

  There are several things going on here. Gelatin swells
when heated, in fact its swelling and melting temperature
are the measure of "hardness". Heat causes an increase in
the motion of molecules and parts of molecules like ions, in
general chemical reactions take place faster as the
temperature is increased. This is more responsible for the
increase in wash rate than any other effect.
  When a sulfite wash aid is used the ion-exchange property
of the sulfite is predominant so wash rate is high even when
the water temperature is relatively low. However, washing is
still faster at higher temperatures.

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

dan.c.quinn@att.net - 31 May 2005 23:22 GMT
> I have found the temperature of the HCA (HEICO, in my case)
> and wash water has a lot of influence on getting the pink
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> and below (think Cleveland winters and the price of natural
> gas) the pink stays in.

 For more on film and print washing enter at Google,
ilford permanganate . The few articles will take some
pointing and clicking.
 Were it not for my interest in permanganate these articles
may have never caught my eye. Dan
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.