Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / June 2005
Two Clears and a Pink? TMAX In XTOL
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Alan Smithee - 23 May 2005 22:59 GMT A couple of days ago I processed three rolls of 35mm film in XTOL. The first roll in the tank was TMAX 100 (TMX) the next two were TMAX 400 (TMY). They were all developed at 9 minutes in XTOL 1:1, Stopped, Fixed for 10 minutes, rinsed for 1 minutes, HCA for 1 minute and rinsed for another 5 minutes. The two rolls of TMY 400 came out completely clear while the TMX 100 was still pink, what's with that?
glaserp@sustainsoft.com - 23 May 2005 23:48 GMT Hi Alan,
You and I have stumbled across the same issue. Please see the thread that has been evolving for the past few days. I think the essence of the thing is to use a two-bath fixing process. Follow on here: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.photo.darkroom/browse_frm/thread/131d7b8 fe7b37a1f/ea5693a7fdedf97f?hl=en#ea5693a7fdedf97f
Alan Smithee - 24 May 2005 06:23 GMT > Hi Alan, > > You and I have stumbled across the same issue. Please see the thread > that has been evolving for the past few days. I think the essence of > the thing is to use a two-bath fixing process. Follow on here: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.photo.darkroom/browse_frm/thread/131d7b8 fe7b37a1f/ea5693a7fdedf97f?hl=en#ea5693a7fdedf97f
After reading the post from Dr. Bob in that thread I think the explanation may be poor rinsing on my part. The TMX was at the bottom of the tank and the least likely to receive a rush of clean water. The pink dye is suppose to be removed by the developer by his account, which puzzles me. I ended up refixing and HCAing that roll two or three times before the dye finally went away. It eventually did clear however.
Richard Knoppow - 24 May 2005 22:52 GMT >> Hi Alan, >> [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > the dye finally went > away. It eventually did clear however. Developer does not remove the sensitizing dye that results in the pink or magenta stain on T-Max film. The stain is due to a dye which is persistent and is bound to the gelatin and to silver in the gelatin. If the film is not completely fixed the dye will remain because the complexes it binds to remain. Films like T-Max and Tri-X which have a large amount of Silver iodide in them are slow to fix. The iodide acts as a restrainer on the fixing. Rapid (ammonium thiosulfate) fixer is less affected by the soluble iodide so it continues to fix at a faster rate even after accumulating iodide. Using rapid fixer is a good practice for these slow to fix films. A two bath fixing regieme helps to overcome both the accumulation of iodide and also the accumulation of thiosulfate ions which are complexed with fixed out silver halide. It takes a lot of free thiosulfate to produce complete fixing and the capacity of a single bath, even of rapid fixer, is quite limited. Because most of the silver and most of the iodide accumulates in the first bath of a two bath syetem the second bath is left in a condition where it fixes at full rate and has enough free thiosulfate to fully complex any remaining halide. This also tends to reduce the amount of sensitizing dye bound to the emulsion. The use of a sulfite wash aid further releases bound silver-thiosulfate complexes and also the dye bound to them. One minute is probably not long enough, probably two minutes is about right. Check the clearing time of the film you are going to fix in the type of fixer you are going to use. The fixing time can be established by this. Soak a sample of the film in plain water for a few minutes because the fixing rate of wetted film is different than dry film. Then fix until the film is visually clear (not turbid from halide), it may still have stain at this point. Fixing should be at least twice this time. If a two bath system is used fix in the first bath for the clearing time and in the second bath for an equal time. Film can be tested for excessive retained silver and silver complexes by a simple test using either a 2% solution of Sodium Sulfide (not sulfite) or a 1:9 dilution of Kodak Rapid Selenium Toner. The toner test has the advantage of being stable for a long time and free of the rotten egg odor of the sulfide. However, it fails if there is much hypo in the material so it can be used only on well washed film or paper. Place a drop or two of the test on a clear area of the film or paper. The film or paper should be wet but the surface should be blotted or squeegeed off. leave the test solution in place for about 2 minutes and rinse it off. It should leave no stain at all. Place film against a white surface to make any stain more visible. If there is any yellow or brown stain it indicates that fixing is not complete. I have no idea why T-Max 100 should be harder to fix than T-Max 400 but perhaps it is.
 Signature --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA dickburk@ix.netcom.com
Frank Pittel - 28 May 2005 09:44 GMT : >> Hi Alan, : >> [quoted text clipped - 73 lines] : I have no idea why T-Max 100 should be harder to fix than : T-Max 400 but perhaps it is. Fascinating as always!! I tried using a two stage fix but decided against it because it takes to much effort. :-) As you suggested I use Kodak's rapid fixer and fix for ~5 minutes. The time is an aprocimation because I only measure time for development accuratly. I do always error on the side of extending the fix for as long as a minute.
If after ~5 minutes of fix and 15 minutes of washing with ~80 degree water there's any pink left in the negative I discard the fixer as exhausted and refix with fresh fixer. I developed this process back in the day when I would check the fixer with hypo check after each use. With time I noticed that if the pink was still there after washing the fix checked out exhausted.
I stoped using the two stage fix ( I use a Jobo processor and it seems more like stages then baths. :-)) when I noticed that a gallon of fixer would fix about the same amount of film irregardless of which system I used and a single stage fix requires less work on my part! :-)
 Signature Keep working millions on welfare depend on you ------------------- fwp@deepthought.com
Rod Smith - 23 May 2005 23:49 GMT > A couple of days ago I processed three rolls of 35mm film in XTOL. The first > roll in the tank was TMAX 100 (TMX) the next two were TMAX 400 (TMY). They > were all developed at 9 minutes in XTOL 1:1, Stopped, Fixed for 10 minutes, > rinsed for 1 minutes, HCA for 1 minute and rinsed for another 5 minutes. The > two rolls of TMY 400 came out completely clear while the TMX 100 was still > pink, what's with that? TMX includes a pink dye. If you search Google Groups on "pink TMX" you'll see lots of reports of this sort of thing; apparently it can be pretty tough to wash out. AFAIK, the problem has nothing to do with the developer. Most posts suggest longer fixing and/or hypo clear stages as a solution, or using fresher fixer -- T-grain films in general tend to exhaust fixer faster than most other films. Your 10-minute fix sounds like it should be long enough with any but exhausted fixer. Perhaps your fixer WAS exhausted, though, or perhaps you should try boosting the hypo clear time. I don't shoot a lot of TMX, though, so I haven't paid a lot of attention to this issue and don't remember all the details.
 Signature Rod Smith, rodsmith@rodsbooks.com http://www.rodsbooks.com Author of books on Linux, FreeBSD, and networking
Alan Smithee - 24 May 2005 06:28 GMT > > A couple of days ago I processed three rolls of 35mm film in XTOL. The first > > roll in the tank was TMAX 100 (TMX) the next two were TMAX 400 (TMY). They [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > time. I don't shoot a lot of TMX, though, so I haven't paid a lot of > attention to this issue and don't remember all the details. I just find it weird that the two rolls of 400 were fine and the 100 was still pink. The processing was identical. Is the dye that much stronger in TMX I guess is the question. The fixer was fresh in this case.
dan.c.quinn@att.net - 24 May 2005 23:08 GMT > TMX includes a pink dye. Period? That is not my understanding. As Dr. Bob has mentioned, a sensitizer, which is in intimate contact with the silver halides is, at least on processing, pink. It is a sensitizer which likely just happens to be pink. It is possible though that the sensitizer has been formulated to be pink. Whether by design or by chance, that color is an indicator of the presence of silver halid in the emulsion. Color indicators can be very, very, sensitive. The most minute amount of silver halide left in the emulsion could cause that 'pink'. I produced two, a very and not so very, pink Pan F+ 120 rolls while testing for the least fixer needed to completely fix. I think it very possible that ALL the usual films will show pink if silver halide remains in the emulsion. Perhaps the OP with TMX encountered the very hardened nature of that film's emulsion. Hardened emulsions slow solution penetration. An HCA solution lifts the ph some over the usual acid fix and swells the emulsion allowing solutions easier access. Also, HCA has a slight solvent action with silver halids. For quicker results a neutral to alkaline fix with an after rinse in Agfa's suggested sodium carbonate hca should work. As for myself, I'll stick with the unadulterated, one-shot, very dilute fixer I now use. If one wishes to try a S. Thio. version put 30 grams of the penta or 20 grams of the anhydrous in the amount of solution needed then test an unexposed roll. Dan
Richard Knoppow - 30 May 2005 00:09 GMT >> TMX includes a pink dye. > [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > amount > of solution needed then test an unexposed roll. Dan This isn't quite how it works. First, emulsion hardness is a measure of the amount it swells. Swelling can be caused by heat or by being more alkaline or more acid than the isoelectric point of the gelatin. Gelatin is amphoretic, that is, it is neither acid or alkaline but has some of the characteristics of both. Gelatin has a sort of preferred pH called the isoelecric point. The isoelectric point is determined by the way the gelatin is processed. Most photographic gelatin is acid processed and has an isoelectric point slightly on the acid side of neutral. When gelatin is immersed in a bath it takes on the pH of that bath. At the isoelectric point the net electric charges in the gelatin are neutral, on either side there is a net charge. This is important because some ions are held to the gelatin by their relative charges, as in like charges repel, opposite charges attract. When gelatin is on the acid side of its isoelectric point it tends to bind thiosulfate and silver complexes. By treating the emulsion in a neutral or alkaline bath the pH is moved above on the alkaline side) the isoelectric point and the charges then tend to repel the adsorbed ions, accelerating washing. One purpose of a sulfite wash aid is to provide this pH adjustment. Any alkali will provide this effect. In the past several materials have been recommended: Agfa recommends a 2% solution of sodium carbonate, in the past Kodak recommended a 2% solution of Ammonium carbonate (because the Ammonium came out faster in washing). One can also use Sodium Metaborate (Kodalk), or even Borax. Another reason for using an alkaline bath before washing is to eliminate the mordanting effect of white alum hardener in hardening fixing baths. The alum has a specific binding effect on thiosulfate and silver complexes. This binding takes place over a range of pH from acid to about neutra. By making the gelatin alkaline the binding effect is eliminated resulting is a substantial increase in washing rate. However, at the pH of the above treatments the cross linking that results in hardening is destroyed. Kodak Hypo Clearing Agent employs Sodium sulfite. The sulifte acts as an alkali but it also has another function. Sulfite turns out to be an effective ion exchanger for thiosulfate and thiosulfate-silver complexes. The sulfite actually displaces these ions but is not bound the either the gelatin or image silver itself. KHCA is buffered to neutral pH. Kodak gives two reasons for this: First, at neural pH the emulsion is above its isoelectric point so there is no longer binding by charge, it is also above the pH at which alum hardener binds ions. However, at neutral the hardening caused by the hardener is substantially intact. Another reason is that at neutral pH the emulsion is close to its isoelectric point, which is also the point of _minimum_ swelling. At this point the diffusion path which must be taken by ions leaving the emulsion in the wash is also minimised. I should point out that gelatin hardness has little if any effect on diffusion rate. Swelling can, but as indicated, diffusion is greatest when swelling is minimum. If you think of the emulsion as a sponge this will make sense. A compacted sponge will absorb more water than a swelled one. Something similar happens with the gelatin of the emulsion. T-Max and some other films, including Tri-X are slow to fix partly because they contain a lot of silver iodide. Three forms of silver halide are used in emulsions: Silver chloride, silver Bromide, and Silver Iodide. Silver chloride is very slow and is found mostly as a component in printing paper. Silver bromide is faster and found in both paper and as the basic form of silver halide in film. In addition most films have a substantial amount of Silver Iodide, which is important in producing film speed. These three are, of course, in soluble in water in the form they take in the film. They are made soluble by the fixing bath. The fastest to fix out is chloride, the next fastest is bromide, the slowest is iodide. Iodide is very slow to fix compared to the others. In addition the free iodide ions act as a restrainer to the fixing bath slowing it down even more. Iodide has a much greater restraining effect on Sodium Thiosulfate fixer than on Ammonium thiosulfate (rapid) fixer. This is one reason that rapid fixers are recommended for films of all types but especially for high iodide films shuch as T-Max, Delta, and Tri-X, which tend to fix out very slowly in sodium fixing baths. While the main limit to fixer capacity is the amount of free thiosulfate ions, in other words by the amount of thiosulfate bound up with dissolved silver, the amount of dissolved iodide is also important. Since it has less effect on ammonium thiosulfate fixer than on sodium the relative capacity of the rapid fixer is greater. It takes a lot of free thiosulfate to convert the halide into fully soluble form, three thiosulfate ions for each halide ion. Residual dye: T-Max and Delta films have a sensitizing dye which seems to be persistent. Sensitizing dyes are added to the emulsion mostly to sensitise it to color. The basic emulsion is sensitive to near UV, blue, and blue green (for Iodide). To get sensitivity in the green and red regions of the spectrum a dye or combination of dyes are added. These dyes are usually removed or decolorized in the deloper but it appears that the dyes used in T-Max are not, or else are bound in some way by somthing else in the emulsion. The dye is definitely not a delibrate addition to indicate the state of fixing. Likely, the dye is bound by the same mechanisms that bind thiosulfate and complexes, namely the electric charges in the emulsion. It appears that any treatment which eliminates this binding will also free the residual dye. Certainly KHCA causes it to be released. Note that the washing time for film recommended after using a standard hardening fixing bath is half an hour at around 68F. After using KHCA a five minute wash is enough. This is indictative of the effectiveness of both the modification of the pH and the ion exchange efffect. Residual silver halide: It is possible to test the level of residual silver halide and silver complexes produced by the fixer in film or paper. The standard test is a 2% solution of Sodium Sulfide (not sulfite) for well washed film or paper a 1:9 dilution of Kodak Rapid Selenium Toner can be used in place of the sulfide. It is more stable and does not have the rotten egg odor of the sulfide. However, it fails where there is an excess of hypo in the emulsion. To use either solution place a couple of drops in a clear area of the film or paper. Allow to stand for about 2 to 3 minutes. The rinse off. There should be no visible stain. Film should be held against a white surface to make any stain more visible. If there is any residual halide or reaction products they will cause a yellow or brown stain. This is really the ultimate test of fixing.
 Signature --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA dickburk@ix.netcom.com
UC - 24 May 2005 03:22 GMT > A couple of days ago I processed three rolls of 35mm film in XTOL. The first > roll in the tank was TMAX 100 (TMX) the next two were TMAX 400 (TMY). They > were all developed at 9 minutes in XTOL 1:1, Stopped, Fixed for 10 minutes, > rinsed for 1 minutes, HCA for 1 minute and rinsed for another 5 minutes. The > two rolls of TMY 400 came out completely clear while the TMX 100 was still > pink, what's with that? Was it RAPID FIXER? Use ONLY rapid fixer!
Alan Smithee - 24 May 2005 06:33 GMT > > A couple of days ago I processed three rolls of 35mm film in XTOL. > The first [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Was it RAPID FIXER? Use ONLY rapid fixer! I don't think the fix was the problem as I didn't see any fogging or haze on any of the negatives. The fix was also fresh in this case.
UC - 24 May 2005 14:27 GMT DON'T USE ANYTHING BUT RAPID FIXER!
> > > A couple of days ago I processed three rolls of 35mm film in XTOL. > > The first [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > I don't think the fix was the problem as I didn't see any fogging or haze on > any of the negatives. The fix was also fresh in this case. Alan Smithee - 24 May 2005 06:40 GMT > > A couple of days ago I processed three rolls of 35mm film in XTOL. > The first [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Was it RAPID FIXER? Use ONLY rapid fixer! I think I may start using Rapid Fix as well. Thx. Seems to be some analytical evidence that it works better, chemically, on these types of films.
Bernie - 24 May 2005 04:49 GMT TMX 100, more grains, although smaller than the ones in TMY 400, hence more sensitizing dye and more pink left over after the process. In addition to fresher or two-bath fix, I would suggest more than just one minute in HCA, and increase the wash time time or make sure you use a good flow of water, not just a rinse.
>A couple of days ago I processed three rolls of 35mm film in XTOL. The >first [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > two rolls of TMY 400 came out completely clear while the TMX 100 was still > pink, what's with that? Alan Smithee - 24 May 2005 06:34 GMT > TMX 100, more grains, although smaller than the ones in TMY 400, hence more > sensitizing dye and more pink left over after the process. In addition to > fresher or two-bath fix, I would suggest more than just one minute in HCA, > and increase the wash time time or make sure you use a good flow of water, > not just a rinse. I think poor water flow may be the culprit. Perhaps I was getting the bottom of the tank completely washed. Thx.
> >A couple of days ago I processed three rolls of 35mm film in XTOL. The > >first [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > two rolls of TMY 400 came out completely clear while the TMX 100 was still > > pink, what's with that? Richard Knoppow - 30 May 2005 00:09 GMT >> TMX 100, more grains, although smaller than the ones in >> TMY 400, hence [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > getting the bottom > of the tank completely washed. Thx. If you are washing in a multiple roll tank, like the old tall Nikor tanks, stick a hose down the center of the reels and feed the water from that. The tank makes a very efficient washer that way. Water flowing onto the top of the tank will not usually get down to the bottom. If you can't rig a hose fitting fix a section of hose to the bottom of a funnel and run the faucet into that.
 Signature --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA dickburk@ix.netcom.com
Richard Knoppow - 29 May 2005 23:24 GMT > TMX 100, more grains, although smaller than the ones in > TMY 400, hence more sensitizing dye and more pink left [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >> TMX 100 was still >> pink, what's with that? Kodak recommends 1 to 2 minutes for film in KHCA. In my experience a 2 minute treatment will remove all the residual dye. The used KHCA comes out light purple. I've been using up a supply of very old T-Max 400 lately. This stuff is at least 10 years old, perhaps older. The curious thing is that it fixes out completely in sodium thiosulfate fixer in a total of 10-12 minutes in a two bath system and has no residual dye stain right from the fixer. I vaguely remember that it did have stain when it was new but I'm not sure. Perhaps something happens to the dye with age. I've asked a friend at Kodak to try to track this down. BTW, the film worked fine. Slightly elevated fog but not bad. This despite having been referigerated for only part of its storage time.
 Signature --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA dickburk@ix.netcom.com
Lloyd Erlick - 30 May 2005 13:36 GMT ...
> Kodak recommends 1 to 2 minutes for film in KHCA. In my >experience a 2 minute treatment will remove all the residual [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >bad. This despite having been referigerated for only part of >its storage time. ...
may3005 from Lloyd Erlick,
I can't prove this, and I'm not exactly an authority on color either, but I think the color that comes out of TMY (T-Max 400) during processing has not been consistent over the years. I think Kodak has made changes in that regard over time, and since the film is ten years old it may have different characteristics.
In a slightly different vein, I have stored exposed rolls of TMY for up to three years before processing. I have never found any difference from promptly developed film in the resulting negatives when I make prints from them.
Also, I have been using exactly the fixing regimen you mention (sodium thiosulfate, two bath fixer, six minutes in each bath -- I agitate constantly in the fix) for years. I also see no residual dye stain right from the fixer, unless I have been extremely sloppy and over-used the fixer. I think a healthy fixer is very important.
regards, --le
 Signature ________________________________ Lloyd Erlick Portraits, Toronto. voice: 416-686-0326 email: portrait@heylloyd.com net: www.heylloyd.com ________________________________
Nicholas O. Lindan - 30 May 2005 16:00 GMT > Kodak recommends 1 to 2 minutes for film in KHCA. In my > experience a 2 minute treatment will remove all the residual > dye. I have found the temperature of the HCA (HEICO, in my case) and wash water has a lot of influence on getting the pink out.
At 75F the pink washes right out with no problem. At 65F and below (think Cleveland winters and the price of natural gas) the pink stays in.
 Signature Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio Consulting Engineer: Electronics; Informatics; Photonics. To reply, remove spaces: n o lindan at ix . netcom . com psst.. want to buy an f-stop timer? nolindan.com/da/fstop/
dan.c.quinn@att.net - 31 May 2005 22:34 GMT > I have found the temperature of the HCA (HEICO, in my case) > and wash water has a lot of influence on getting the pink [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > and below (think Cleveland winters and the price of natural > gas) the pink stays in. Via Google I found a study dealing with film washing. Potassium Permanganate was used to test the wash water. A test done with, IIRC, 75F wash water disclosed the presence of thiosulfate where the 68F test showed none. The Ilford film wash sequence was under study. Dan
Richard Knoppow - 01 Jun 2005 05:49 GMT >> I have found the temperature of the HCA (HEICO, in my >> case) [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > of thiosulfate where the 68F test showed none. > The Ilford film wash sequence was under study. Dan Kodak did testing of fixing and washing at various temperatures decades ago. Washing is accelerated by wash water temperature. Below about 65F washing is very slow unless a sulfite wash aid is used. The wash aid results in reasonable washing rates down to about 50F. The Pemanganate test is an old one. It measures the amount of thiosulfate in the water coming out of the paper. Since the diffusion rate is much slower at 65F than at 75F its not surprizing that the test would show much less hypo in the water. The Permanganate test was supplanted in the late 1940's by other methods, in particular the Silver nitrate test and the Methylene Blue test both of which measure the level of residual hypo actually in the emulsion and paper. The Permanganate test is probably valid for measuring the rate at which hypo is able to diffuse out of the paper but it is not a good test for the effectivness of washing, i.e., the level of residual hypo in the emulsion.
 Signature --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA dickburk@ix.netcom.com
dan.c.quinn@att.net - 02 Jun 2005 00:11 GMT > ... Washing is accelerated by wash water temperature. > Below about 65F washing is very slow So, washing is faster at 75F then at 65F. I'd think the warmer water acting on the emulsion would cause the gelatine to swell some little. But what of that longer "diffusion path" which results? I've seen so often mentioned the slow downs in washing due to a longer "diffusion path" Search this NG for, diffusion path . Dan
Richard Knoppow - 11 Jun 2005 18:22 GMT >> ... Washing is accelerated by wash water temperature. >> Below about 65F washing is very slow [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > longer "diffusion path" > Search this NG for, diffusion path . Dan There are several things going on here. Gelatin swells when heated, in fact its swelling and melting temperature are the measure of "hardness". Heat causes an increase in the motion of molecules and parts of molecules like ions, in general chemical reactions take place faster as the temperature is increased. This is more responsible for the increase in wash rate than any other effect. When a sulfite wash aid is used the ion-exchange property of the sulfite is predominant so wash rate is high even when the water temperature is relatively low. However, washing is still faster at higher temperatures.
 Signature --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA dickburk@ix.netcom.com
dan.c.quinn@att.net - 31 May 2005 23:22 GMT > I have found the temperature of the HCA (HEICO, in my case) > and wash water has a lot of influence on getting the pink [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > and below (think Cleveland winters and the price of natural > gas) the pink stays in. For more on film and print washing enter at Google, ilford permanganate . The few articles will take some pointing and clicking. Were it not for my interest in permanganate these articles may have never caught my eye. Dan
|
|
|