Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Lucky SHD 100 and 400

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Neil Purling - 25 Apr 2005 19:47 GMT
In the UK these two Vhinese emulsions are available from Retro Photographic.
They exhibit a unusual effect of halation around the highlights because
there is no anti-halation layer on the back of the film.
This much I have observed. I have also seen some marks on the emulsion ,on
individual frames only.
Is this maker prone to wayward quality?
A search with Google on newsgroup posts for Lucky film suggests emulsion
defects could be expected.
I had the first roll (Lucky SHD 400) processed commercially. I am going to
have another processed by Ilford.
Luka Gojceta - 25 Apr 2005 19:54 GMT
A friend of mine experienced the same problem (dev. in D76 1:1 @ 20 deg.C)

--
"You've got to have an opinion..."

Luka Gojceta

> In the UK these two Vhinese emulsions are available from Retro Photographic.
> They exhibit a unusual effect of halation around the highlights because
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I had the first roll (Lucky SHD 400) processed commercially. I am going to
> have another processed by Ilford.
UC - 26 Apr 2005 01:24 GMT
Are you retarded or what?

Use Ilford or Kodak film!

> In the UK these two Vhinese emulsions are available from Retro Photographic.
> They exhibit a unusual effect of halation around the highlights because
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I had the first roll (Lucky SHD 400) processed commercially. I am going to
> have another processed by Ilford.
Neil Purling - 29 Apr 2005 19:17 GMT
No reason to get abusive.

I just get curious about oddball emulsions from different parts of the
world.
I have bulk loaders with Agfapan 400 and Ilford Pan F.
This doesnt stop me getting curious about other films, especially if they
have something different to offer.
The Chinese film has unusual behaviour which would lead me to use it in a
old Soviet Smena 6 compact.
Nicholas O. Lindan - 30 Apr 2005 16:18 GMT
"Neil Purling" <neil@sextant.karoo.co.uk> wrote

> The Chinese film has unusual behaviour which would lead me to use it in a
> old Soviet Smena 6 compact.

It also breaks in the middle of the roll?

I have a Smena #?, the $15.95 one, and the lens is bloody good, shutter
works, aperture and focus are fine and it has sunny-16 engraved on the
lens barrel.  If the body didn't spontaneously shatter and fly apart it
would be a good choice for teaching photography in schools.

Signature

Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Consulting Engineer:  Electronics; Informatics; Photonics.
To reply, remove spaces: n o lindan at ix  . netcom . com

Neil Purling - 01 May 2005 19:16 GMT
I think that the problems with the shutter are because the Soviets regarded
quality control as a depraved Capitalist idea they'd have nothing to do
with. I haven't used the Smena that much because i've got a whole bunch of
cameras.
You need a reloadable casette to serve as take-up spool.
You keep the whole casette so the film does not need rewinding. I do believe
that the later Smenas had a rewind but mine certainly doesn't.
I also purchased the BLIK ranngefinder to go with it.
The lens is a triplet, a mild wide angle as most compacts are.
The lens is soft in the outer field at wider apertures, which you can use to
advantage.
The Chinese film is very prone to halation around bright areas, like the sky
because it isn't back coated
David Nebenzahl - 02 May 2005 00:30 GMT
On 4/29/2005 11:17 AM Neil Purling spake thus:

> No reason to get abusive.

It's his raison d'etre.

> I just get curious about oddball emulsions from different parts of the
> world.

Me too. Curiosity good. My last experiment was with some very outdated Tura
120 film, which gave me pretty good results, considering, but also some very
strange artifacts: weird bubble-like spots here and there.

> The Chinese film has unusual behaviour which would lead me to use it in a
> old Soviet Smena 6 compact.

Yes, that halation sounds interesting: something you can't get with most other
films, with their anti-halation coatings. Could result in some cool-looking
images.

Signature

It's a good guess that one of two things is going to happen in the
coming days and weeks: Either Bolton goes down—-or we start learning
a lot of unpleasant things about Sen. George Voinovich.

- _Slate_, 4/19/05 (http://slate.msn.com/id/2117028/)

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.