Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / April 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

delta3200 with rodinal: ok but takes a little bit longer than 11 minutes

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Gianni Rondinini - 04 Apr 2005 15:56 GMT
hi all.

yesterday evening i developed 2 of my delta3200's with rodinal.
i used rodinal 1+25, 20°c. then i fixed for 8 minutes with ornano
rapid fixer and the usual 6/7 minutes in agepon, agfa's wetting agent.

i must say the negatives show a good contrast and a reasonable tone,
but i think that overdeveloping at least 1 minute may give better
results, because the film seems a little bit dark to me. i'll
"sacrify" a film for a deeper test.

a friend of mine insists that with rodinal you can deeply modify
contrast and grain of the film and says that going to 19 --or even a
bit less-- degrees and increasing development time by 30% would give
far better results as grain and contrast --with fast films--. perhaps
next time i'll give this a try.

chances are also that this wednesday evening i'll develop delta3200's
@12500 with t-max developer --the ones we've been talking about some
weeks ago--. i'll let you know the results on friday.

i hope i'll start printing soon --i still miss a red safe filter for
enlarger lenses: my enlargers were used for color prints and have no
safelight filter at the moment--.

regards,
Signature

Gianni Rondinini
Icem s.r.l. - http://www.icem.it
Tel: +39 0545 78036
Fax: +39 0545 78727

David Nebenzahl - 04 Apr 2005 19:09 GMT
On 4/4/2005 7:56 AM Gianni Rondinini spake thus:

> yesterday evening i developed 2 of my delta3200's with rodinal.
> i used rodinal 1+25, 20°c. then i fixed for 8 minutes with ornano
> rapid fixer and the usual 6/7 minutes in agepon, agfa's wetting agent.

6-7 minutes? Why on earth would you do that? You need 30 seconds max. with any
wetting agent, whether Agepon, Photo-Flo or dish detergent. All you need to do
is coat the film so the water film covers it all over.

> i must say the negatives show a good contrast and a reasonable tone,
> but i think that overdeveloping at least 1 minute may give better
> results, because the film seems a little bit dark to me. i'll
> "sacrify" a film for a deeper test.

"Sacrifice"? But surely you meant to say that _underdeveloping_ may give
better results, because if the film seems a bit dark, then it's overdeveloped
(or overexposed).

If the film seems too light, then you may want to try more development.

Signature

"I know I will go to hell, because I pardoned Richard Nixon."

- Former President Gerald Ford to his golf partners, as related by
the late Hunter S. Thompson

Gianni Rondinini - 06 Apr 2005 10:13 GMT
>6-7 minutes? Why on earth would you do that? You need 30 seconds max. with any
>wetting agent, whether Agepon, Photo-Flo or dish detergent. All you need to do

well, after reading your post i read the sticker on the agepon bottle
and saw that it says "30"-1'" :)
i wasn't in a hurry to remove the film from the wetting agent and used
to leave it there while i washed the tank and something else.

>"Sacrifice"? But surely you meant to say that _underdeveloping_ may give
>better results, because if the film seems a bit dark, then it's overdeveloped
>(or overexposed).

ok, i wrote it the wrong way, but got the point.
i said sacrifice meaning that i won't use a roll of "meaningful"
photos to do some experiments. usually i shot some still life to do my
experiments with films and everything else: a meaningless film can be
sacrified to understand where i'm missing somethings.

thank you.
Signature

Gianni Rondinini
Icem s.r.l. - http://www.icem.it
Tel: +39 0545 78036
Fax: +39 0545 78727

PGG - 06 Apr 2005 15:04 GMT
>>6-7 minutes? Why on earth would you do that? You need 30 seconds max. with any
>>wetting agent, whether Agepon, Photo-Flo or dish detergent. All you need to do
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> i wasn't in a hurry to remove the film from the wetting agent and used
> to leave it there while i washed the tank and something else.

This probably means 30 parts water to 1 part Agepon.  Make sure it is
heavily diluted.  Distilled water prefereable.  In fact I often just use
distilled water only with no wetting agent
Gianni Rondinini - 06 Apr 2005 16:41 GMT
>This probably means 30 parts water to 1 part Agepon.  Make sure it is

no, it's the time suggested for tratment...

as diluition, i work at the recommended 1+200.
never used distilled water, but i'll give it a chance.

thank you.

regards,
Signature

Gianni Rondinini
Icem s.r.l. - http://www.icem.it
Tel: +39 0545 78036
Fax: +39 0545 78727

David Nebenzahl - 06 Apr 2005 17:12 GMT
On 4/6/2005 8:41 AM Gianni Rondinini spake thus:

>> This probably means 30 parts water to 1 part Agepon.  Make sure it is
>
> no, it's the time suggested for tratment...
>
> as diluition, i work at the recommended 1+200.

Try 1+400 instead. That's what I do with Photo-Flo, which is half the
recommended dilution. I find the standard dilution is too strong and leave too
heavy a film on the film.

Signature

"I know I will go to hell, because I pardoned Richard Nixon."

- Former President Gerald Ford to his golf partners, as related by
the late Hunter S. Thompson

Gianni Rondinini - 07 Apr 2005 10:47 GMT
>Try 1+400 instead. That's what I do with Photo-Flo, which is half the

ok, i'll try 1+400.
thank you.

regards,
Signature

Gianni Rondinini
Icem s.r.l. - http://www.icem.it
Tel: +39 0545 78036
Fax: +39 0545 78727

Lloyd Erlick - 09 Apr 2005 14:04 GMT
...  Distilled water prefereable.  In fact I often just
use
>distilled water only with no wetting agent

apr905 from Lloyd Erlick,

Distilled water is very useful in the darkroom. For
final wash of films, it can't be beat. I hang my roll
films in a dust free place, and squirt distilled water
down both sides of each roll. I never use wetting
agent, and I never touch the surfaces of the film while
they are wet (this means no squeegee, no gloves, no
fingers, touch the films). I have never found a problem
from lack of wetting agent. Also, I have never seen a
problem from any sort of mechanical distortion of the
film from differential drying of droplets clinging to
the surfaces vs relatively dry areas of no droplets. By
the time the rolls are dry, they are perfectly uniform
(and clean). Films currently manufactured are well able
to dry uniformly with no problem. In fact, I believe a
wetting agent is incorporated in the coating of modern
films, although it would likely be gone by the time the
film was washed. (I mostly use Kodak film, but I've
never seen a problem from my washing and drying
technique with Agfa or Ilford over the years.)

Wetting agent might be useful for final film wash in
tap water, which might tend to promote water spots on
the dry film (i.e., deposits of minerals from the water
where it had formed droplets on the film and dried).
Distilled water obviates this problem.

The ultimate final wash would probably be to immerse
the film in distilled water while still on the reel.
Two or three changes of distilled water this way and
even the last vestiges of tap water absorbed into the
coating would probably be gone.

regards,
--le
Signature

________________________________
Lloyd Erlick Portraits, Toronto.
voice: 416-686-0326
email: portrait@heylloyd.com
net: www.heylloyd.com
________________________________

pgg - 05 Apr 2005 00:10 GMT
Rodinal and Delta3200 aren't a good match.  The latter is a grainy film
with a true film speed of 1000-1200 instead of 3200.  Therefore you want a
developer that extracts as much shadow detail (or film speed) as possible
and dissolves grain.  Rodinal does _not_ do this.

Ilford Microphen is a good match with Delta3200.

> hi all.
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> regards,
Gianni Rondinini - 06 Apr 2005 10:13 GMT
>Rodinal and Delta3200 aren't a good match.  The latter is a grainy film

i thought they were. after one day of drying the films seemed nice,
but i haven't printed them yet.

>developer that extracts as much shadow detail (or film speed) as possible
>and dissolves grain.  Rodinal does _not_ do this.

ok, i understand.

>Ilford Microphen is a good match with Delta3200.

but *impossible* to find in italy. i even thought that it was
discontinued. i can find tmax and xtol, if they may be better.

regards,
Signature

Gianni Rondinini
Icem s.r.l. - http://www.icem.it
Tel: +39 0545 78036
Fax: +39 0545 78727

PGG - 06 Apr 2005 15:03 GMT
> but *impossible* to find in italy. i even thought that it was
> discontinued. i can find tmax and xtol, if they may be better.

Xtol is a great match for Delta3200.  It delivers more film speed (shadow
detail) than Rodinal.  

Rodinal may deliver results that you like depending on personal
preferences.  I expect it to be grainy, but you might like that.

 
Gianni Rondinini - 06 Apr 2005 16:43 GMT
>Xtol is a great match for Delta3200.  It delivers more film speed (shadow
>detail) than Rodinal.  

ok, i'll stick to xtol for the next ones. i have it at home, so i can
try. i've read good things also of tmax + delta3200: another
possibility to try.

>Rodinal may deliver results that you like depending on personal
>preferences.  I expect it to be grainy, but you might like that.

well, those are pictures taken at a live stage in a jazz club: *thick*
grain was exactly what i wanted, but i haven't printed them yet, then
i don't know how grainy the films are.

i'll let you know --and hope i like it...--.

regards,
Signature

Gianni Rondinini
Icem s.r.l. - http://www.icem.it
Tel: +39 0545 78036
Fax: +39 0545 78727

John - 06 Apr 2005 21:23 GMT
>>Ilford Microphen is a good match with Delta3200.
>
>but *impossible* to find in italy. i even thought that it was
>discontinued. i can find tmax and xtol, if they may be better.

    Make your own. Use the formula for ID68

lfords ID-68
Water @ 125F    750.0ml
Sod. Sulfite    85g
Hydroquinone    5.0g
Borax        7.0g
Boric Acid    2.0g
Pot. Bromide    1.0g
Phenidone    0.13g
Water to make     1.0L

John - http://www.puresilver.org

"Are you planning on accepting the new definition of photography?" - Frank
"Just as soon as humanity accepts a new definition of the term humanity." - John
dan.c.quinn@att.net - 06 Apr 2005 23:55 GMT
>     Make your own. Use the formula for ID68
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Phenidone    0.13g
> Water to make     1.0L

 Two more ID-68 formulas from Patrick Dignan:

 ID-68 "Officially Modified": A mix; P and Q - .2 and 5 gr
                                     S. metabisulfite .75 gr.
                                     S. sulfite 100 gr.
 I think it, 'add the sulfite last' as the phenidone will
 more quickly dissolve in acid solution.
                              B mix; Borax and Boric Acid
                                     3 and 3.5 gr.
                                     P. Bromide 1 gr.
 A and B togeather to make 1 liter. Ph, 8.9 .

 ID-68, a one solution mix: Drop the borax and meta. Use 2 gr
 of Boric Acid. I'd think it, 'add save but a pinch' the
 sulfite last.

 Now there are at least three formulas for ID-68. Ilford's
PQ Universal is the exact same as the above 'modified' save
for no metabisulfite.
 The PQ Universal is a D76 and ID11B buffered equivalent. So
what does it all boil down to? So far five D76 or ID-11B or ID
-68 formulas which in use will likely give same results. Dan
John - 07 Apr 2005 05:17 GMT
> So
>what does it all boil down to? So far five D76 or ID-11B or ID
>-68 formulas which in use will likely give same results. Dan

    Not entirely. I find Microphen to be very different than D76. I know it's not
really supposed to be but I can't deny the better shadow contrasts I get with Microphen.

John - http://www.puresilver.org

"Are you planning on accepting the new definition of photography?" - Frank
"Just as soon as humanity accepts a new definition of the term humanity." - John
Stefano Bramato - 08 Apr 2005 03:45 GMT
>     Not entirely. I find Microphen to be very different than D76. I know it's not
> really supposed to be but I can't deny the better shadow contrasts I get with Microphen.

yes i follow you.
MIcrophen has better shadow and contrast control (and better grain if diluted)
than id11.

Ciao,
Stefano Bramato

--
ed io imparo...
dan.c.quinn@att.net - 08 Apr 2005 21:57 GMT
> > So far five D76 or ID-11B or ID-68 formulas which in use
> > will likely give same results. Dan
>
>     Not entirely. I find Microphen to be very different than
>   D76. I know it's not really supposed to be but I can't deny
>   the better shadow contrasts I get with Microphen.

   "... better shadow contrasts ..." That implies a shorter
toe. In effect a boost in ISO is the result with phenidone.
That is consistant with reports of higher emulsion speeds
with that agent. Do you think that the case? Dan
John - 09 Apr 2005 23:57 GMT
>    "... better shadow contrasts ..." That implies a shorter
>toe. In effect a boost in ISO is the result with phenidone.
>That is consistant with reports of higher emulsion speeds
>with that agent. Do you think that the case? Dan

    No doubt about it. It's really a good all-around developer. Not going to replace
my D23 but it's the only other developer I bother with.

John - http://www.puresilver.org

"Are you planning on accepting the new definition of photography?" - Frank
"Just as soon as humanity accepts a new definition of the term humanity." - John
Gianni Rondinini - 07 Apr 2005 10:47 GMT
>    Make your own. Use the formula for ID68

i'll try.
thank you.

regards,
Signature

Gianni Rondinini
Icem s.r.l. - http://www.icem.it
Tel: +39 0545 78036
Fax: +39 0545 78727

Stefano Bramato - 08 Apr 2005 03:43 GMT
Forse forse il Newsgroup serve bene e  Gianni Rondinini  oggi dice che...

> >    Make your own. Use the formula for ID68
>
> i'll try.
> thank you.
>
> regards,

It's my favourite and I made some slight variations.
If you're interested i can write heere my personal variation on id68-microphen
type developer-

Ciao,
Stefano Bramato

--
ed io imparo...
Gianni Rondinini - 08 Apr 2005 16:54 GMT
>If you're interested i can write heere my personal variation on id68-microphen
>type developer-

why not?

ps: where are you from? i live in faenza (ra)
Signature

Gianni Rondinini
Icem s.r.l. - http://www.icem.it
Tel: +39 0545 78036
Fax: +39 0545 78727

Stefano Bramato - 11 Apr 2005 15:49 GMT
> why not?
>
> ps: where are you from? i live in faenza (ra)

Ciao Gianni,
here my personal variation recipe for id68 - Microphen type developer:

water            750 ml
Sodium sulphite    100 g
Hydroquinone        6.5 g
Borax            8.0 g
Boric Acid        3.5 g
Potassium Bromide    1.0 g
Phenidone        0.2 g
water             to make 1000 ml

I use it diluted 1:1.
I've to solve some problems of storing, seems to be more prone to oxidation
than packed microphen.

MOre suggestions and comments are very very appreciated from everyone here.
Please mr Knoppow, as you are so expert gimme some suggestions!!

PS:
I live in Brindisi.

Ciao,
Stefano Bramato

--
ed io imparo...
dan.c.quinn@att.net - 11 Apr 2005 22:50 GMT
> ... seems to be more prone to oxidation
> than packed microphen.

There is a good chance your chemicals contain some what
more of some impurities which promote oxidation. Dan
Stefano Bramato - 12 Apr 2005 03:23 GMT
>  There is a good chance your chemicals contain some what
> more of some impurities which promote oxidation. Dan

I don't think so.
The stuff was bought in USA straight from Photographers Formulary and I use low
mineral water...

Ciao,
Stefano Bramato

--
ed io imparo...
John - 12 Apr 2005 17:14 GMT
>here my personal variation recipe for id68 - Microphen type developer:
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>MOre suggestions and comments are very very appreciated from everyone here.
>Please mr Knoppow, as you are so expert gimme some suggestions!!

    IMO, I would place the Borax into a completely separate solution which you would
use for your 1:1 dilution. Like this :

    Divided ID-68

        SOLUTION A
    Water        750 ML
    Sod.Sulfite    100g
    Hydroquinone    6.5g
    Boric Acid    3.5g
    Pot.Bromide    1.0g
    Phenidone    0.2g
    Water to make    1.0L

      SOLUTION B
    Water        750ml
    Borax (Gran.)    8.0g
    Water to make     1.0L

    Use 1A : 1B to make your working solution. This will effectively stop oxidation as
it does not progress in acidic environments.

John - http://www.puresilver.org

"Are you planning on accepting the new definition of photography?" - Frank
"Just as soon as humanity accepts a new definition of the term humanity." - John
Stefano Bramato - 06 Apr 2005 17:08 GMT
Ciao Gianni,
i can suggest to use Microphen or HC110 to obtain the results that you
want.
Microphen is quite good also when diluted 1:1 for pushing, only having
care to developing in longer times
and the geain is quite fine.
HC110 have a finer grain that Rodinal (but worst than Microphen IMO) but
is more active
and the grain is very acute.

I suggest also to try this combinations.

ciao,
Stefano

--
ed io imparo.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.