> That's nice to know, but you should also know that anybody can do the same job
> (accurately aligning their enlarger) with a simple technique requiring only
> two ordinary mirrors.
> [re: Versalab] ... anybody can do the same job (accurately aligning their
> enlarger) with a simple technique requiring only two ordinary mirrors.
The 2-mirror trick works, it's cheap and it's available at any
hardware store.
I use it and don't like it. The top mirror has to be held against
the lens barrel with one hand while one peers through the hole in
the top mirror (have the hardware store grind the mirror edges smooth or
pick up some band-aids on the way home) and then using the other
hand turn an invisible (remember, you are peering through the hole
in the mirror so you can't see squat) and hard to get at alignment
screw while leaning over and bent double at the waist.
To make the alignment easier I use cross of two strips of white
correction tape around the hole and illuminate the tape/top mirror
with a Tensor lamp. The classic method uses a magic-marker black cross,
but it is hard to illuminate black and so the view is quite
dim.
To make the job much easier, Guillermo posted earlier about using
four LED's shining out through the top mirror. There was a website
illustration but it has disappeared. Herewith the original r.p.d.
post:
> From: "G.P" <a...@my.email.pls>
> Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 01:08:25 GMT
> I just finished a prototype of a Poor man's LED alignment tools and it works
beautifully!! It is nothing extraordinary but thought to post a
description for the sake of those that like me are looking for a cheap way
to align their enlarger.
> Took a piece of plywood 1/8"x5"x5", made a 1/2" hole at its center and 4
holes 1.5" from the center and equidistant from each other, these holes were
just big enough to allow the insertion of 4 standard LED's (one in each
hole), the LEDs were series connected, a 50 resistor was added to the
circuit to limit the current and LEDS+resistor fed by a 9volts battery. The
configuration of holes of the piece of wood was replicated at the end side
on one of the mirrors, holes were not made on the mirror, instead its
backing was scraped. The piece of wood with the circuit was glued onto the
mirror. I happened to have the prism of my defunct very first SLR (Minolta
XG2), I placed this prism on the center hole of the piece of wood and can
see very clearly the alignment dots-cross pattern thru the prism. A prism
is not absolutely necessary, one can peek from above the mirror and thru its
center hole, but a prism make the alignment so much easier. A prism can be
easily obtained from a defunct SLR camera, eBay lists many broken SLRs going
for very little money. Edmund Sci. has a right angle prism for about $10,
this place also sells surplus prisms http://www.anchoroptics.com/
> Guillermo
I still, however, lust for a Versalab when alignment time comes around.

Signature
Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Consulting Engineer: Electronics; Informatics; Photonics.
To reply, remove spaces: n o lindan at ix . netcom . com
psst.. want to buy an f-stop timer? nolindan.com/da/fstop/
Lloyd Erlick - 24 Mar 2005 16:13 GMT
mar2405 from Lloyd Erlick,
Uh-oh. Have I been silly again? I've been relying on
the hype around my durst enlarger (L1200). Supposedly
they do not fall out of alignment. Not true?
regards,
--le

Signature
________________________________
Lloyd Erlick Portraits, Toronto.
voice: 416-686-0326
email: portrait@heylloyd.com
net: www.heylloyd.com
________________________________
Nicholas O. Lindan - 24 Mar 2005 18:32 GMT
> Uh-oh. Have I been silly again? I've been relying on
> the hype around my durst enlarger (L1200). Supposedly
> they do not fall out of alignment. Not true?
I imagine it depends on how far it fell and what it fell on.

Signature
Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Consulting Engineer: Electronics; Informatics; Photonics.
To reply, remove spaces: n o lindan at ix . netcom . com
psst.. want to buy an f-stop timer? nolindan.com/da/fstop/
dan.c.quinn@att.net - 24 Mar 2005 23:00 GMT
> I still, however, lust for a Versalab when alignment
> time comes around.
I don't lust at all. In my mind the the proof of a good
alignment is an enlarged, distortion free, all corners sharp,
projection. The proof of that is on the easel. So, I still
maintain that the best method of alignment makes use of a
square, a ruler, and of course, the tools needed for
the adjustments.
Secondary surfaces and indirect proofs are by that method
factored out. What you see is what you get. Dan