feb2705 from Lloyd Erlick,
>Everything I have read (and experienced) with this toner is that its life is
>dependent upon the number of times the solution is used to tone not how long
>it is sitting in the bottle.
Yes, I think so, too. It seems quite capable of sitting
in the bottle for a very long time, years and years,
apparently.
The tip off that it is losing its strength is
>when the toning times get intolerably long.
And when it's used fairly concentrated, (I dilute my
KRST 1+5 with distilled water) it takes a long time to
lose strength from use. It loses solution volume much
more quickly due to carry-out on the sheets of paper.
This means additional fresh working strength toner must
be added to top it up. So when a relatively strong KRST
solution is used, it's unlikely to suffer reduced
toning capability.
I keep my diluted solution in a
>heavy plastic bottle I salvaged from some other product.
Me too. Mine has a four inch wide mouth, and originally
held cat food. I like the wide mouth because I work
single-tray, so pouring the solution back into the jug
is quite easy with a four inch target. This way the
toner is in the tray only while toning a print, so the
smell of ammonia only has a few minutes to get around
my darkroom. Also, the toner is stored in its working
container. And the toner isn't in the tray long enough
to stain it.
When I get that
>ocasional black stuff and it gets too bothersome I either slowly pour off
>the solution from the bottle into the tray and rinse out the small amt left
>in the bottle or pour the entire solution through a piece of coffee filter
>paper.
>
>Sam
I've noticed over a long period of time that the black
stuff adhering to the walls of my KRST jug is reducing.
I've used this jug since before I gave up acid in the
darkroom, and it was pretty black at the bottom. Over
time the black is disappearing now that there is no
acid in my process.
regards,
--le

Signature
________________________________
Lloyd Erlick Portraits, Toronto.
voice: 416-686-0326
email: portrait@heylloyd.com
net: www.heylloyd.com
________________________________
Tom Phillips - 27 Feb 2005 20:35 GMT
> feb2705 from Lloyd Erlick,
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> solution is used, it's unlikely to suffer reduced
> toning capability.
By using a stronger concentration you have more
toner and tones faster, but it would still suffer
reduced toning capability (both in time and capacity)
since the toning solution still gradually weakens as
you run prints through it. You're not maintaining a
true 1:5 dilution by topping it off, it's still
gradually getting weaker albeit slower than if you
didn't top it off. By using such a strong dilution
you likely just don't notice this.
There may be a difference in how well it keeps based
on the degree of dilution though, or how you store it.
I use it 1:9 and keep it in glass jars. I gradually
extend the toning time as the number of prints toned
increases. This is because to my knowledge there is no
way to determine the correct amount of fresh toner to
add/replenish in order to maintain the original toner
strength/dilution over time. So if with fresh toner
1:9 I tone for 3 minutes, that time gradually gets
extended as the toner weakens (i.e., I guess at the
time based on the intensity of the color change observed.)
> I keep my diluted solution in a
> >heavy plastic bottle I salvaged from some other product.
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> ________________________________
> --