Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / January 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Kentmere Papers Now Directly Available in USA?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ken Nadvornick - 24 Jan 2005 07:49 GMT
From the Kentmere USA (under 'About Kentmere') web site at:

     http://www.kentmereusa.com

     "2005 marks the first time that Kentmere markets its premier
     line of black and white photographic papers under its own name
     in the United States: a superb lineup of fiber based papers
     headed by cold tone graded papers and two variable contrast
     papers. A fast full toned graded resin-coated paper and a
     variable contrast paper have great appeal for both beginning
     photo students and professional labs. Additionally, a fine art
     product line of unique papers in both glossy and matte surfaces,
     geared for the alternative processes such as lith printing and
     hand coloring, round out what is the most complete line of black
     and white photographic papers now available."

I've long had the urge to try the cold-tone Kentmere Bromide graded papers,
but didn't wish to fly to the UK to get it.  According to the above Web
site, it should now be directly available from Freestyle in April, 2005.
Several other papers are claimed to be available as of January, 2005.

(Alas, a check of Freestyle just now showed no search hits for the keyword
"Kentmere.")

Ken
Stephan Goldstein - 24 Jan 2005 12:30 GMT
>From the Kentmere USA (under 'About Kentmere') web site at:
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
>Ken

Aren't Kentmere branded as Luminos in the US?

Steve
Nicholas O. Lindan - 24 Jan 2005 18:49 GMT
"Stephan Goldstein" <sg0ldo1867@yahoo.com> wrote
"Ken Nadvornick" <register.nadvor@verizon.net> wrote:
> >      "2005 marks the first time that Kentmere markets its premier
> >      line of black and white photographic papers under its own name
> >      in the United States

> Aren't Kentmere branded as Luminos in the US?

The mystery: Is Kentmere rebranded Luminos or is Luminos rebranded Kentmere?

It's been a while, but all the Luminos I ever bought was made in Spain,
Hungary, Chekoslovakia etc.  The origin would change now and then with
no notice on the box that it is really a different paper unless
you read the fine print on the bottom.

Luminos is/was the only brand still available in all the old funky
surfaces: burlap, silk, crystal matte, really-really matte ...
They were high-kitsch when they were available but I miss them
now: cream base, brown image, burlap surface.

Signature

Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Consulting Engineer:  Electronics; Informatics; Photonics.
To reply, remove spaces: n o lindan at ix  . netcom . com
psst.. want to buy an f-stop timer? nolindan.com/da/fstop/

jrplatinum - 26 Jan 2005 01:44 GMT
Steve,

Luminos had been marketing some of the Kentmere papers in the U.S.  Now
Luminos is not handling the Kentmere papers.  Freestyle Photo is the
exclusive Kentmere distributor in the U.S.  The first of the product
should be available in the next couple of weeks.

John Richardson
Lawrence Akutagawa - 24 Jan 2005 16:37 GMT
While visiting the LA area during the past holidays, I dropped by Freestyle
to pick up some photo supplies and was told that Freestyle would be offering
Kentmere papers late this month (Jan '05).  A quick check of the Freestyle
website shows no reference to the papers yet.  A short email by interested
persons to Freestyle's customer service should indicate to the mgt there
that they best be quicker than later in making this paper available.  The
sample prints on this paper that I was shown were awesome indeed!

> From the Kentmere USA (under 'About Kentmere') web site at:
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Ken
jrplatinum - 26 Jan 2005 01:46 GMT
Ken,

The Kentmere paper is going through customs as we speak.  When we have
it in stock depends on the government.  Thanks for the great
compliments!

John Richardson
Nicholas O. Lindan - 26 Jan 2005 13:00 GMT
> The Kentmere paper [is just the same old stuff in a new box
> at a higher price.]

This group does not take kindly to commercial posts.  And your post is
in violation of the group charter: so look out, black helicopters
are flying to your place as we speak.

Signature

Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Consulting Engineer:  Electronics; Informatics; Photonics.
To reply, remove spaces: n o lindan at ix  . netcom . com
psst.. want to buy an f-stop timer? nolindan.com/da/fstop/

Tom Phillips - 26 Jan 2005 18:15 GMT
> > The Kentmere paper [is just the same old stuff in a new box
> > at a higher price.]
>
> This group does not take kindly to commercial posts.  And your post is
> in violation of the group charter:


Seems he just posted some relevant info.
Richard Knoppow - 28 Jan 2005 23:40 GMT
>> The Kentmere paper [is just the same old stuff in a new
>> box
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> helicopters
> are flying to your place as we speak.

 C'mon Nicholas, this is a representative of a large store
replying directly to a question, not an advertisment. Back
when Jobo and Ilford used to answer questions here it was
considered a service and not advertising.
 You know I am about as strict on the advertising ban as
anyone here.

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

Gregory Blank - 29 Jan 2005 01:12 GMT
>   C'mon Nicholas, this is a representative of a large store
> replying directly to a question, not an advertisment. Back
> when Jobo and Ilford used to answer questions here it was
> considered a service and not advertising.
>   You know I am about as strict on the advertising ban as
> anyone here.

I am glad you replied as such, I was leaning towards the
same thoughts...thanks for pushing me back towards expressing it.

Its a definite plus that Jobo, and others have contributed here
I would like to see those days resume.

Signature

LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918

John - 24 Jan 2005 20:18 GMT
>From the Kentmere USA (under 'About Kentmere') web site at:
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>(Alas, a check of Freestyle just now showed no search hits for the keyword
>"Kentmere.")

    I tried the Freestyle brand and found it acceptable but not
particularly great. One concern I have is that the do seem to enjoy
bashing Ilford on their site. Another concern is how long will
companies import papers to a country whose dollar is persistently
declining ?

    Just 4 more years .....

Regards,

  John S. Douglas, Photographer -  http://www.puresilver.org
             Please remove the "_" when replying via email
Tom Phillips - 24 Jan 2005 23:19 GMT
> >From the Kentmere USA (under 'About Kentmere') web site at:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> companies import papers to a country whose dollar is persistently
> declining ?

Bashing Ilford? Freestyle? I haven't noticed this.

>         Just 4 more years .....

I predict the radical right in congress tries to
repeal the 22nd Amendment so Bush can steal
another election and continue his world crusade.

After all, God has appointed him...

> Regards,
>
>    John S. Douglas, Photographer -  http://www.puresilver.org
>               Please remove the "_" when replying via email
John - 25 Jan 2005 00:28 GMT
>Bashing Ilford? Freestyle? I haven't noticed this.
>
>>         Just 4 more years .....

"At a time when other companies are struggling, debt-free Kentmere
continues its commitment to fiduciary responsibility, funding all of
its product development and expansion out of its considerable cash
investments and reserves. The company is not run by disinterested
stockholders or banks, but by a dedicated management team that takes a
very hands-on approach to pursuing the company's long-term goals."

    I don't think that anyone fits that target better than Ilford
as they're owned by a bank.

>I predict the radical right in congress tries to
>repeal the 22nd Amendment so Bush can steal
>another election and continue his world crusade.

    Yes we all must be freed and impoverished.

>After all, God has appointed him...

    If that's the case I would have rather had the flood !

    The debt is currently just a little over :

Seven thousand six hundred and twenty five BILLION dollars !

    Your share is roughly $26,000. Will that be cash, check or Pay
Pal ?

    Oh BTW, that is NOT tax deductible !

Regards,

  John S. Douglas, Photographer -  http://www.puresilver.org
             Please remove the "_" when replying via email
Tom Phillips - 25 Jan 2005 02:28 GMT
> >Bashing Ilford? Freestyle? I haven't noticed this.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>         I don't think that anyone fits that target better than Ilford
> as they're owned by a bank.

I think that's basically an interpretation. Really
an ad for Kentmere assuring product availability
(good marketing) is what I see there.

Freestyle has told me the same about Ilford,
that Ilford remains committed to product
availability (i.e., Freestyle's Arista brand
is Ilford paper and film.)

I don't buy either claim :)

> >I predict the radical right in congress tries to
> >repeal the 22nd Amendment so Bush can steal
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>         If that's the case I would have rather had the flood !

Well! Billy Graham says so! So There!
God, don't ya know, is an American and
a Republican! Jesus is white...

>         The debt is currently just a little over :
>
> Seven thousand six hundred and twenty five BILLION dollars !
>
>         Your share is roughly $26,000. Will that be cash, check or Pay
> Pal ?

From a photographer? Good luck collecting
is all I can say ;^)
Gregory Blank - 25 Jan 2005 04:17 GMT
> From a photographer? Good luck collecting
> is all I can say ;^)

Two guys keep me from paying, Smith & E. Weston ;-)

Signature

LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918

John - 25 Jan 2005 09:31 GMT
>> From a photographer? Good luck collecting
>> is all I can say ;^)
>
>Two guys keep me from paying, Smith & E. Weston ;-)

    They come to my home and I'm gonna hit them with a Durst 138 !

Regards,

  John S. Douglas, Photographer -  http://www.puresilver.org
             Please remove the "_" when replying via email
Gregory Blank - 25 Jan 2005 04:14 GMT
> I predict the radical right in congress tries to
> repeal the 22nd Amendment so Bush can steal
> another election and continue his world crusade.
>  
> After all, God has appointed him...

Be careful with that. You'll get me started, and its not pretty
when I get mad. I've been semi mad for four years. Lets just think
photo.

Signature

LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918

Lloyd usenet-Erlick - 25 Jan 2005 12:18 GMT
... You'll get me started, and its not pretty
>when I get mad. I've been semi mad for four years. Lets just think
>photo.

Yes, sorry, I feel the same way. It's all too easy to
get me started on this.
--le
Tom Phillips - 25 Jan 2005 18:23 GMT
> > I predict the radical right in congress tries to
> > repeal the 22nd Amendment so Bush can steal
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Be careful with that.

But it was on CNN :-)

> You'll get me started, and its not pretty
> when I get mad. I've been semi mad for four years. Lets just think
> photo.

One has to consider the absurdity of Bush and his
so-called mission from God and apply appropriate
sardonic humor.

> --
> LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
> to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
Lloyd usenet-Erlick - 25 Jan 2005 20:24 GMT
...

>One has to consider the absurdity of Bush and his
>so-called mission from God and apply appropriate
>sardonic humor.

...

jan2505 from Lloyd Erlick,

Yes! Sardonic humour is the Canadian way, as a matter
of fact.

Sardonic humour doesn't stop the very real effects --
on the whole world -- of additional trillions of
dollars of debt.

I'm really not trying to sound the alarm or anything,
though. We've all seen this before. I'd just like to
understand why no one is saying this out loud. I guess
I shouldn't wonder, though, when the revelations of
torture and the excesses at that prison in Iraq have
not elicited much reaction. Actually, I'm surprised to
see myself unsurprised at the lack of reaction.
Sardonic giving way to cynical??

regards,
--le
Andrew Price - 25 Jan 2005 21:36 GMT
[---]

>Sardonic humour doesn't stop the very real effects --
>on the whole world -- of additional trillions of
>dollars of debt.

I'm glad that I've finished paying off my mortgage.
Lloyd usenet-Erlick - 26 Jan 2005 04:55 GMT
>[---]
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>I'm glad that I've finished paying off my mortgage.

jan2505 from Lloyd Erlick,

Do you have children or grand-children?
Nicholas O. Lindan - 26 Jan 2005 13:04 GMT
> [Budget, monetary collapse, apocalypse ...]
> Do you have children or grand-children?

We all inherit our forefathers' screw-ups.  It is not going
to change, so dance while you can.

Signature

Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Consulting Engineer:  Electronics; Informatics; Photonics.
To reply, remove spaces: n o lindan at ix  . netcom . com
psst.. want to buy an f-stop timer? nolindan.com/da/fstop/

Andrew Price - 26 Jan 2005 19:33 GMT
[---]

>>>Sardonic humour doesn't stop the very real effects --
>>>on the whole world -- of additional trillions of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Do you have children or grand-children?

No, but I understand the relevance of your question.  Accession to
property may become very much more difficult for the future
generation.
Tom Phillips - 25 Jan 2005 22:36 GMT
> ...
> >
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> though. We've all seen this before. I'd just like to
> understand why no one is saying this out loud.

Most of what a lot of people hear these days is
controlled by a few media moguls. Context and
critical journalism is lost in the stampede to
report the most shallow, sensational "news" that
will bump up the mogul's ratings and profit. Witness
the neverending Scott Peterson saga.

The rest is right wing talk radio which, as with
Fox News, first "decides" and then "reports."

I guess
> I shouldn't wonder, though, when the revelations of
> torture and the excesses at that prison in Iraq have
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> regards,
> --le
David Starr - 25 Jan 2005 22:53 GMT
>One has to consider the absurdity of Bush and his
>so-called mission from God and apply appropriate
>sardonic humor.

Jake & Elwood could relate.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Professional Shop Rat: 14,573 days in a GM plant.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Lloyd usenet-Erlick - 25 Jan 2005 12:02 GMT
...

>    Just 4 more years .....
>
>Regards,
>
>   John S. Douglas, Photographer -  http://www.puresilver.org
>              Please remove the "_" when replying via email

[sorry, I'm OT and I can't help myself. History is
repeating itself and we're all going to pay ...]

jan2504 from Lloyd Erlick,

Four more years of what? Deficit financing? I see the
projections are for the US federal budget to be about a
half trillion dollars in deficit annually for the
foreseeable future. If there are deficits like that for
the next four years, it's not very likely year five
will be less! We've seen this in Canada (and didn't the
US go through the very same over the seventies and
eighties?). If you want a strong dollar, better not put
your economy that deeply into debt. And by the way, is
money being printed to stretch over that debt? We've
all had a pretty good look at what happens when the US
economy prints a lot of money...

I'm confused by American peoples' reactions to a half
trillion dollar debt every year. Is it considered a
large amount of money or not?

If the half trillion every year had to be raised by
taxation, would there not be a howl? Why is the same
half trillion raised as debt not a concern? It turns
into taxation later, when it's time to repay, except it
gets carrying costs added. Anyone suggesting this on
behalf of buying a health care system would be called a
commie.

Is the economy really so large it can borrow that much
every year and not be affected? Last time it happened
the worldwide money markets were powerfully affected,
and every householder was in competition with the USA
for borrowed money. Under Reagan, who set a few
record-breaking deficits in a row, interest rates went
through the roof. In those days (mid-eighties) I
remember being very relieved that the rates had come
*down* a tad before our mortgage needed renewal and we
were able to get one at 15%. That was a good rate!
Mortgages peaked at 22% in Canada.

Now another Republican comes along and starts setting
new federal deficit-financing records in the US. Pardon
me for saying, but this looks very bad from the
outside. Does it look good to anyone on the inside of
the US economy? Who would it be that thinks it's a good
thing? Who is benefiting?

And what evidence is there to suggest that it will last
only four years? Judging by the last time it happened,
for every year of deficit, several years of struggle to
slowly reduce deficits were required. Trillions (and
*how many* trillions will it end up being??) of dollars
debt means years and years of repayment later.

Fiscal conservatives always used to say it was wrong to
saddle our descendants with such a large debt. When did
the Republicans stop being fiscal conservatives?

In both our countries (Canada and USA) we see the
spectacle of so-called conservatives applying words
like reform and revolution to their activities. I
believe Bush used the word reform just the other day.

In Ontario, we just recently disposed of a decade-long
conservative administration that billed itself as a
'revolution'. The common sense revolution, they called
it. Once they were out it became known that the overall
deficit left behind (debt, that is) is over ten billion
dollars. So it's very hard for the new administration
to carry on any kind of activity, except repayment.
Sound familiar? (Interestingly, the new administration
here introduced legislation to prevent any government
from hiding debt before an election. Supposedly, it's
full disclosure and transparency now. Pretty late in
the game for this little improvement, isn't it? The
same trick has been pulled frequently.)

Not many people even ask where the money went. Who
holds that debt? Who is getting rich?

Compared to all this, a Canadian-style health care
system for all Americans would be cheap. (Believe me,
you'd like it.) And the money spent on it would mostly
remain circulating within the US. War is just a money
pit.

An American friend of mine remarked the other day that
we all should pray for the continued good health of
President Bush, because Vice President Cheney looks
even scarier! I remember exactly the same thing being
said about Spiro Agnew in Nixon times.

I'm afraid I've lost the thread -- exactly what was
wrong with Al Gore again?

sigh,
--le
Gregory Blank - 25 Jan 2005 13:03 GMT
> I'm afraid I've lost the thread -- exactly what was
> wrong with Al Gore again?

The a majority of the American people seem to have a problem with
a leader that actually thinks.

Signature

LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918

Lloyd usenet-Erlick - 25 Jan 2005 15:41 GMT
>> I'm afraid I've lost the thread -- exactly what was
>> wrong with Al Gore again?
>
>The a majority of the American people seem to have a problem with
>a leader that actually thinks.

jan2505 from Lloyd Erlick,

It's very Canadian to wish to give no offense. In the
case of the USA, there is a great deal of friendly
feeling among Canadians. I'd guess it would the same
throughout the western world, even though there is a
lot of complaint, too. Mostly, the complaints seem to
be along the lines of 'wish you could improve', or
'wish you could follow your own precepts ....' Seldom
do I see such a harsh criticism as you've made, above.
Not that I'm doubting you, or contradicting you. Sadly.
It's interesting that from elsewhere complaints mainly
seem to be friendly requests from friends (could you
please not legitimize torture; it would be very nice if
you would apply your own laws to people you detain) or
name calling from this month's list of enemies
(infidel! the only good American is a dead Jew!).

There must be reasons for these peculiar traits.
American society was able to take significant steps to
rectify the huge problem of racist elements of law and
institutions in the 1960s and later; why can't this
problem be identified and corrected? Shunning
intelligent leadership is self-defeating. It also makes
the neighbours nervous.

regards,
--le
Gregory Blank - 25 Jan 2005 21:44 GMT
> Shunning intelligent leadership is self-defeating. It also makes
> the neighbours nervous.

Well, we both agree there are many good people in The USA, as well
as abroad. He either won fair and square or he did not. Time will
tell fro sure, because a true tyrant can never resist trying to keep the
power hold that they think they have gained "fairly".

There's no way in hell he will get another term, if that's any
consolation, there are just too many people opposed to him.

Signature

LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918

Ken Nadvornick - 25 Jan 2005 18:04 GMT
> [sorry, I'm OT and I can't help myself. History is
> repeating itself and we're all going to pay ...]
[quoted text clipped - 95 lines]
> sigh,
> --le

Uh... wow.

Sorry I brought up the subject of B&W photographic paper.  Won't make that
mistake again...

Ken
Tom Phillips - 25 Jan 2005 18:31 GMT
snip

> Uh... wow.
>
> Sorry I brought up the subject of B&W photographic paper.  Won't make that
> mistake again...

Oh now, we all need a little OT diversion
now and then :)

But I wasn't familiar with this paper prior
so will have to try it.
Lloyd usenet-Erlick - 25 Jan 2005 20:26 GMT
>...
>Uh... wow.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Ken

Jan 2505 from Lloyd Erlick,

Yes, you're right. Sorry, this subject just pulls it
out no matter how I clench my teeth.

I'll try to stop.

regards,
--le
Tom Phillips - 25 Jan 2005 18:17 GMT
snip...

> Now another Republican comes along and starts setting
> new federal deficit-financing records in the US. Pardon
> me for saying, but this looks very bad from the
> outside. Does it look good to anyone on the inside of
> the US economy? Who would it be that thinks it's a good
> thing? Who is benefiting?

But Lloyd you miss the point of all this. Deficits
are the major strategy of the Reagan Revolution neocons.
Being the anti-government zealots they are (meaning
their view is government shouldn't be in the business
of doing things for those citizens who's taxes pay to
run that government...), their strategy is to cut taxes
(mainly for CEOs to the tune of a trillion $$$), run
up a massive deficit thus creating a crisis, then cut
all government spending that isn't _pentagon_ related.
You'll notice in the new projections Bush's $100 billion
war expenditures aren't consider a part of this year's
deficit figures...

> Fiscal conservatives always used to say it was wrong to
> saddle our descendants with such a large debt. When did
> the Republicans stop being fiscal conservatives?

When they stopped being conservatives...

> In both our countries (Canada and USA) we see the
> spectacle of so-called conservatives applying words
> like reform and revolution to their activities. I
> believe Bush used the word reform just the other day.

Yes, reform government by the people and for the people
to government by and for the CEOs...

snip again...

> An American friend of mine remarked the other day that
> we all should pray for the continued good health of
> President Bush, because Vice President Cheney looks
> even scarier! I remember exactly the same thing being
> said about Spiro Agnew in Nixon times.

I would beg to differ. Cheney _is_ the president :)
You don't think a guy who spent the first 40 years
of his life blowing cocaine up his nose and
rearranging his brain has really been running this
country for the last 4 years, do you? ;^)

> I'm afraid I've lost the thread -- exactly what was
> wrong with Al Gore again?

Nothing. He actually won in 2000...
Lloyd usenet-Erlick - 25 Jan 2005 20:37 GMT
jan2505 from Lloyd Erlick,

I wouldn't argue with a word you've said. But as an
outsider I'd expect to be chastised for being so blunt,
or outspoken, or pig-headed, or ingrate, were I to say
it.

Your explication brings to mind the transition of
ancient Rome from its republican start (not
Republican!) to its degenerative imperial period, full
of self centered emperors empowered first by various
gods and then by God.

I'm trying to think of graded papers made in England...

regards,
--le

>snip...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
>
>Nothing. He actually won in 2000...
Tom Phillips - 25 Jan 2005 22:29 GMT
> jan2505 from Lloyd Erlick,
>
> I wouldn't argue with a word you've said. But as an
> outsider I'd expect to be chastised for being so blunt,
> or outspoken, or pig-headed, or ingrate, were I to say
> it.

I think globalization means political opinion
is globally valid.

> Your explication brings to mind the transition of
> ancient Rome from its republican start (not
> Republican!) to its degenerative imperial period, full
> of self centered emperors empowered first by various
> gods and then by God.

This is what's happening. But instead of a king-god
or pope-god, we will have an evangelical right wing
talk radio-god. The real God must be amused by all
this self important human arrogance and historical
repetition.

> I'm trying to think of graded papers made in England...

On topic, does anyone know how Kentmere compares to
other cold tone graded papers, like Seagull?

> regards,
> --le
[quoted text clipped - 53 lines]
> >
> >Nothing. He actually won in 2000...
jrplatinum - 26 Jan 2005 01:40 GMT
Ken,

Prices for the first shipment of Kentmere papers from Freestyle Photo
are now up on their web site at www.freestylephoto.biz.  The first
shipment does not include the cold tone graded bromide papers.
Tom Phillips - 26 Jan 2005 02:10 GMT
> Ken,
>
> Prices for the first shipment of Kentmere papers from Freestyle Photo
> are now up on their web site at www.freestylephoto.biz.  The first
> shipment does not include the cold tone graded bromide papers.

Meaning?
Ken Nadvornick - 26 Jan 2005 05:13 GMT
> Prices for the first shipment of Kentmere papers from Freestyle Photo
> are now up on their web site at www.freestylephoto.biz.  The first
> shipment does not include the cold tone graded bromide papers.

Hi John,

Many thanks for the relevant reply.  Although I'm most anxious to try the
graded bromide papers, over time I expect to explore all of the other
Kentmere offerings as well.  A consistent, dependable supply of quality
graded bromide, however, would be a dream come true for me.

You sound directly connected to either Kentmere USA or Freestyle?

Thanks again,
Ken
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.