Andre,

On www.apug.org there is a discussion thread on this very topic at
the moment.

Jordan

I thought only Kodak could process Kodachrome....are you sure it was
Kodachome??
I have experimented processing the Ektachromes in color negative..c41 and
you get a color neg with no orange mask. Did it in 1961 when no real hi
speed color was available for slides or print. It gave a very contrasty neg
that could be printed in color by sandwhiching a clear processed unexposed
neg with your normal color pack with pretty good results, grainy like pushed
tri-x at 1000asa. But when you needed the shot that required high speed
color it was great. Kodak supported the unorthadox processing for a while by
give you the formula for an extra chemical you added to the c41 so you could
then process your c41 negs normally. If you did not add the chemical your
normal c41 negs were screwed and you could never color balance, thus it
became a dedicated line for the exktachromes processed as color negs with no
organge mask. Kodak then stopped supporting this way of processing because
they got a lot of complaints from people who really did not know their way
around a lab.
Since that was 1961-63 I really do not know if you can do that anymore.
The reaso I question your Kodacrome way is because only Kodak can process
that film. A friend of mine tried to process Kodachrome in an unorthadox
chemical and only got clear film with lots of black scum floating on top of
the chemicals.
Hope this helped.
Yours,
Tom

De goede a écrit :

Hi !
I do not see what could make it go wrong ?
Of course, you'll have to fiddle a bit with dev times but you can use a
few inches to check.
Ekta has no masks, nor color mask you have to remove, so it should be
simpler than Kodachrome.
I've done B&W slides using E6 chemistry on C41 B&W film with not so bad
results so everything is possible ...
HAve a nice day !