Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

question about chemical developers

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Beppe Albor? - 23 Dec 2004 15:19 GMT
hi.
i was reading the safety sheets of some development chemicals products for
film and for papers.
in every sheet that i've read, there's always a paragraph like this :

"Irritating to eyes, respiratory system and skin. Limited evidence of a
carcinogenic effect. May
cause sensitisation by skin contact. Possible risk of irreversible effects.
Carcinogen Category 3.
Mutagen Category 3."

do you know if it's possible to find safe development products, without the
risk of carcinogenic effects ?
i've heard that there are some ecological developers, without a substance
called "hidroquinone".
do you think these products without hidroquinone can be safe from this point
of view (i mean, without the risk of carcinogenic effects ) ?

please, let me know, thanks !!!
Nick Zentena - 23 Dec 2004 16:18 GMT
> hi.
> i was reading the safety sheets of some development chemicals products for
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> do you think these products without hidroquinone can be safe from this point
> of view (i mean, without the risk of carcinogenic effects ) ?

 First of all everything is dangerous. Don't drink the stuff. Don't take a
bath in it. Some developers use Ascorbic Acid [Vitamin C] in place of
Hydroquine. That should be safer.

      I'll bet your house is full of stuff more dangerous then your
photochemicals. The important thing is safe handling.

        Nick
Claudio Bonavolta - 23 Dec 2004 16:46 GMT
> hi.
> i was reading the safety sheets of some development chemicals products for
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> please, let me know, thanks !!!

Hydroquinone is considered a carcinogen now. It has been used, and still be used, widely.
If you don't put constantly your hands in liquid developers, don't breathe the dust from powder
developers and work in a ventilated area, I consider these risks close to nil ...
Hydroquinone is not the only hazardous chemical in a darkroom but using simple prevention habits
limits the risk to the minimum.
By the way, I'm sure you have household products that are certainly more dangerous than the great
majority of the common photographic chemicals.

There are developers more environment friendly like the developers using Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C)
as main development agent.
The most common is XTol, used for films and this a great developer, my favourite for nearly all
films from low to medium-high sensitivity.
For papers, Agfa Neutol Plus also uses Vitamin C.
These not the only ones.
There are also formulas on the web using Vitamin C if you want to mix them from scratch, just do a
Google search.

Un salutone,
Signature

Claudio Bonavolta
http://www.bonavolta.ch

Mike King - 23 Dec 2004 16:58 GMT
I am neither a chemist, an environmentalist or a doctor but here is my
personal take and opinion, backed up by 30 years in the darkroom.  MSDS
sheets are written by lawyers and are full of "CYA" (Cover Your A**).
There are MSDS sheets for water and Oxygen both of which are essential for
life but that can be hazardous when used incorrectly.  And that new items
get added to the mutagenic and carcinogenic lists all the time.  Here is a
link to a "worst case" MSDS for Dihydrogen Monoxide (aka water)
http://www.hsegroup.com/hse/text/water.htm

Having said that, keep in mind that if you limit your exposure to these
substances you should be OK, Hydroquinone is used in some topical skin
cremes but the MSDS warns about skin exposure!  Metol used to be considered
the "baddie", older literature had a lot to say about "metol poisoning" it's
been found the problem was caused by impurities rather than Metol.

I use tongs when processing prints but will reach into a tray when a print
gets stuck, I just wash my hands after I do it.  I don't smoke (talk about
your carcinogens!) and advise against smoking in the darkroom, other than
the smoke film on everything in the darkroom there's that whole hand to
mouth thing.  I won't eat in the darkroom either for the same
reason--besides a break to get a snack in the middle of a session is smart
anyway--gets you out into fresh air for a few minutes.

So here are my rules:

Don't eat, drink or smoke in the darkroom.  If you smoke, you've already
been exposed to more carcinogens that you will experience in a lifetime in
the darkroom.  Probably also true if you eat a lot of red meat or barbeque!

Use tongs for prints.

Frequently wash your hands!  If you wear gloves, wash them frequently, too.

Mix chemicals in another room, the dust is bad for you and your sensitized
materials, too.

Mix chemicals from liquid concentrates or if you mix from dry or bulk
components wear a simple dust mask; a respirator and good ventilation is
recommended for strong organic compounds like acetic acid.

Use eye protection, gloves and a mask when mixing.

Understand and use all chemical handling precautions, read the product
labels, always add acids to water not the reverse, dilution of strong acids
and bases require special techniques and extra care; Glacial Acetic acid,
concentrated ammonia and sodium/potassium hydroxide are especially nasty and
should not be attempted without understanding the extra precautions
required.  Be especially careful when compounding old formulas that use
heavy metals or really toxic, nasty metallic salts.  Mercury, selenium
metal, mercuric chloride, sodium dichromate (or bichromate in old
literature) come to mind but there's a lot of other nasty chemicals out
there, too.  There are a lot of really good chemists that are on this list
(much better than me) if in doubt query the group.

Wipe down your counters and clean your equipment immediately, whenever you
use it, clean your counters after mixing chemicals, clean up all spills
immediately, chemicals in solution are much easier to clear up than dried-on
crud.

Install good ventilation.

Don't even think about using a mercury thermometer!

Take frequent breaks away from the darkroom.

Have GFCI outlets installed in your darkroom and adequate safelighting.

Rubber floor mats are non-slip and good for your feet and back.  Clean them
frequently and the floor beneath your mats.

If you MUST use safer products try Xtol film developer or others made with
ascorbic acid/sodium ascorbate, D-23 uses only Metol no hydroquinone, use
citric acid stop baths (or none), use alkaline fixers or fixers made from
sodium thiosulfate rather than ammonium.  Paper developers with phenidone
rather than Metol (Ilford Bromophen or Multigrade Developer come to mind).

Signature

darkroommike

----------

> hi.
> i was reading the safety sheets of some development chemicals products for
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> please, let me know, thanks !!!
Gregory Blank - 23 Dec 2004 17:24 GMT
> I am neither a chemist, an environmentalist or a doctor but here is my
> personal take and opinion, backed up by 30 years in the darkroom.  MSDS
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> link to a "worst case" MSDS for Dihydrogen Monoxide (aka water)
> http://www.hsegroup.com/hse/text/water.htm

>Snip other good stuff<

As well thought out and defined as that is, you should save it and
repost it when ever the question or a similar one reappears :-)

Signature

LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918

uraniumcommittee@yahoo.com - 23 Dec 2004 17:27 GMT
I have never used ruber gloves and I put my hands in paper developer
all the time. No problem!
Jim Phelps - 23 Dec 2004 18:15 GMT
>I have never used ruber gloves and I put my hands in paper developer
> all the time. No problem!

Uhmm,

  That would be 'Rubber' gloves.  Maybe one has something to do with the
other;~))
uraniumcommittee@yahoo.com - 23 Dec 2004 19:02 GMT
My fingurs don't reed two weel eithre!
Nicholas O. Lindan - 23 Dec 2004 19:26 GMT
> MSDS for Dihydrogen Monoxide (aka water)
> http://www.hsegroup.com/hse/text/water.htm

I think results in getting a really hysterical MSDS for water
may better if water were called:

                  * Hydrogen Hydroxide *

Crystalline colorless solid with liquid and vapor phases.

Shares common properties with other metal hydroxides as sodium
hydroxide (lye).

Cautions:

o Extremely corrosive.  Paraffin containers are required
  for long-term storage.

o Subject to violent phase changes. Heating or cooling will cause
  vessel rupture. Explosion proof vessels with emergency venting
  are recommended and are required at temperatures above 100C.

o Evaporation hazard.  Must be kept in hermetically sealed containers.

....

o Will cause suffocation, workers must be issued breathing apparatus.

o Although small quantities are required for life, consumption
  results in certain death from sodium channel depolarization and
  subsequent cessation of coronary function.

Signature

Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Consulting Engineer:  Electronics; Informatics; Photonics.
Remove spaces etc. to reply: n o lindan at net com dot com
psst.. want to buy an f-stop timer? nolindan.com/da/fstop/

Jim Phelps - 24 Dec 2004 02:59 GMT
> o Although small quantities are required for life, consumption
>   results in certain death from sodium channel depolarization and
>   subsequent cessation of coronary function.

Just goes to show you, anything in sufficient quantity will cause some form
of harm to the human being.
LR Kalajainen - 23 Dec 2004 20:25 GMT
Here's a very simple mix-it-yourself formula using harmless chemicals,
similar to commercial developers such as Xtol or Agfa Neutol.  All the
chemicals you can get at your local hardware store or supermarket.  I've
been using this formula for Delta-400, Delta-100, Fuji ACROS 100 and
Fuji Neopan with outstanding results:

6 g. Sodium carbonate  (this is a common chemical used in dishwasher
detergents or marketed as Arm & Hammer Washing Soda, if that's available
in Italy.)  Alternatively, you can buy it from any chemical supply
house.  It's also sold in swimming pool supply stores as "pH Plus" or
something similar.

4 g. Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) powder or crystals, available in any
natural food or health food store.

4 ml. 1% Phenidone solution  (dissolve 1 g Phenidone powder--the only
chemical you must buy from a proper chemical supply place-- in 100 ml of
90% alcohol.)  Phenidone will dissolve in water, but it takes longer.  
The alcohol preserves it well, and a 100 ml bottle will last months.

1 liter of water.

At 22 degrees Celsius, Delta 100 or Fuji ACROS or Fuji Neopan will
develop in approximately 7 minutes.  You may have to experiment a bit to
find the best time for you.  I rate those films at one stop less than
their manufacturer-recommended speed, so Delta 100 at ISO 50, etc.

For Delta 400, you may want to substitute borax for the sodium carbonate
or your times may be too short.  With borax, Delta 400 will take
approximately 8 minutes; with carbonate, approximately 5.

I lived in Paris for a long time, and had no trouble getting any of
these chemicals.  I would assume they're equally available in Italy,
though perhaps in different packaging or under different brand names.  
But all are friendly to humans and the environment.

Cheers,
Larry

Beppe Alborè wrote:

>hi.
>i was reading the safety sheets of some development chemicals products for
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>please, let me know, thanks !!!
Beppe Albor? - 23 Dec 2004 22:51 GMT
thanks for your help.
i've just a little question for you:
in your opinion, are the following products carcinogenic, or carcinogenic
suspected ?

negative film developer:   kodak xtol

paper developers: kodak ektaflo, kodak selectol

thanks!

Here's a very simple mix-it-yourself formula using harmless chemicals,
similar to commercial developers such as Xtol or Agfa Neutol.  All the
chemicals you can get at your local hardware store or supermarket.  I've
been using this formula for Delta-400, Delta-100, Fuji ACROS 100 and
Fuji Neopan with outstanding results:

6 g. Sodium carbonate  (this is a common chemical used in dishwasher
detergents or marketed as Arm & Hammer Washing Soda, if that's available
in Italy.)  Alternatively, you can buy it from any chemical supply
house.  It's also sold in swimming pool supply stores as "pH Plus" or
something similar.

4 g. Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) powder or crystals, available in any
natural food or health food store.

4 ml. 1% Phenidone solution  (dissolve 1 g Phenidone powder--the only
chemical you must buy from a proper chemical supply place-- in 100 ml of
90% alcohol.)  Phenidone will dissolve in water, but it takes longer.
The alcohol preserves it well, and a 100 ml bottle will last months.

1 liter of water.

At 22 degrees Celsius, Delta 100 or Fuji ACROS or Fuji Neopan will
develop in approximately 7 minutes.  You may have to experiment a bit to
find the best time for you.  I rate those films at one stop less than
their manufacturer-recommended speed, so Delta 100 at ISO 50, etc.

For Delta 400, you may want to substitute borax for the sodium carbonate
or your times may be too short.  With borax, Delta 400 will take
approximately 8 minutes; with carbonate, approximately 5.

I lived in Paris for a long time, and had no trouble getting any of
these chemicals.  I would assume they're equally available in Italy,
though perhaps in different packaging or under different brand names.
But all are friendly to humans and the environment.

Cheers,
Larry

Beppe Albor? wrote:

>hi.
>i was reading the safety sheets of some development chemicals products for
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>please, let me know, thanks !!!
LR Kalajainen - 24 Dec 2004 04:27 GMT
Beppe, I'm not a medical specialist or a chemist, so my opinion is only
that of a reasonably informed layman.  As far as I know, none of the
chemicals I mentioned are carcinogens, nor are the ones in the
developers you mentioned.  Selectol does contain metol, which can cause
skin irritation in a few people, but it is not terribly toxic.  I've
been mixing chemicals for more than 35 years and have never had a bad
reaction or any sort of problem with any of them.

Larry

Beppe Alborè wrote:

>thanks for your help.
>i've just a little question for you:
[quoted text clipped - 74 lines]
>>
>>please, let me know, thanks !!!
dan.c.quinn@att.net - 24 Dec 2004 22:51 GMT
> Here's a very simple mix-it-yourself formula
>
> 6 g. Sodium carbonate>
> 4 g. Vitamin C (ascorbic acid)
> 4 ml. 1% Phenidone solution
> 1 liter of water.

Looked like FX-1 so I checked my copy of P. Dignan's
Classic B&W Formulas. An article there by Gerald Koch,
High Acutance Developers, includes a few formulas;
Beutler, FX-1, FX-13, and Mason.
Mason: .5 gram metol, 5 gram sulfite, and 5.85 gram
carbonate. A trace of iodide is indicated but I think
usually ignored.
I found Beutler too active and FX-1 about right with
Pan F+. Mason's is the same as FX-1 save that it has
twice the carbonate.
I'd think your formula more like Mason's. That A.
acid will need the extra carbonate to give more
like FX-1 results.
BTW, is that carbonate the mono or deca hydrate?
Washing soda is the decahydrate. That would make
a big difference. I'd think then your formula
more like FX-1.                                    Dan
PATRICK GAINER - 25 Dec 2004 18:20 GMT
>  
>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
>  

That is essentially my formula that I published in Darkroom and Creative
Photo Techniques in 1994. There were several variations of it in that
article.
dan.c.quinn@att.net - 23 Dec 2004 23:13 GMT
RE: Beppe Alborè wrote:

> please, let me know, thanks !

If you must, rinse. I would'nt go so far as to
say "wash".
My advise, be up-wind when working with powders.
It's a rare, exotic brew which contains or uses toxic,
skull and crossbones, chemistry. I've one in stock,
sodium selenite. The words TOXIC and Fatal are on
the label.
Of more concern are fumes, more so than in previous
times due to the increase in asthma. To do without the
fumes and oder, use a neutral to alkaline process.  Dan
dan.c.quinn@att.net - 24 Dec 2004 10:21 GMT
RE: Beppe Alborè wrote:

Read all about it! Search this NG for, infirmary . Also,
I'm a bad speller, search for, infirmiry .          Dan
Lloyd Usenet-Erlick - 24 Dec 2004 13:55 GMT
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:19:15 GMT, "Beppe Alborè"
<joker-artist@libero.it> wrote:

>hi.
>i was reading the safety sheets of some development chemicals products for
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>please, let me know, thanks !!!

dec2404 from Lloyd Erlick,

It is very easy to avoid bodily contact with any
chemical used in an ordinary darkroom, especially a
black and white darkroom.

I use the single-tray method of working for making FB
prints, and I never have the least touch of chemistry
on my skin, without gloves or skin-protection creams.

Regular darkroom chemicals are used in water solution,
so they will cannot jump out and get you. Sometimes a
gas may be formed, but the gases involved are smelly,
so they are clear when they are present, and they are
not unduly dangerous if ventilation is used. It's easy
to avoid drinking or eating the chemicals, so with all
modes of transport into the body cut off, even
dangerous chemicals couldn't cause harm.

Substances like hydroquinone need not be feared, so
long as one is not breathing hydroquinone powder/dust
or stirring it into one's coffee (bet you couldn't
swallow it anyway!!) Hydroquinone is likely more of a
problem at the manufacturing end where workers must
handle large amounts day after day. A regular darkroom
worker who keeps hands out of the solutions will not be
likely to suffer from contact.

regards,
--le
Signature

________________________________
Lloyd Erlick Portraits, Toronto.
voice: 416-686-0326
email: portrait@heylloyd.com
net: www.heylloyd.com
________________________________

David Nebenzahl - 24 Dec 2004 16:59 GMT
On 12/23/2004 7:19 AM Beppe Alborè spake thus:

> i've heard that there are some ecological developers, without a substance
> called "hidroquinone".

Speaking of hydroquinone, do y'all realize that this is the chemical agent
thought to be responsible for Michael Jackson's death pallor?

- http://itsb.ucsf.edu/~vcr/Freeze2b.html *
- http://www.snopes.com/photos/jackson.asp
- http://www.robertkotlermd.com/people_news.htm

* actually, they say it's "a cream containing monobenzyl ether of
hydroquinone (also called benoquin)"

Signature

 Today's bullshit job description:

 • Collaborate to produce operational procedures for the systems management
 of the production Information Technology infrastructure.

- from an actual job listing on Craigslist (http://www.craigslist.org)

Claudio Bonavolta - 25 Dec 2004 14:54 GMT
> On 12/23/2004 7:19 AM Beppe Albor? spake thus:
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> * actually, they say it's "a cream containing monobenzyl ether of
> hydroquinone (also called benoquin)"

Yep, and this was the reason France promulgated a law obliging all photo shops to put the developers
containing hydroquinone in closed cupboards ...

Regards,
Signature

Claudio Bonavolta
http://www.bonavolta.ch

The Wogster - 26 Dec 2004 23:45 GMT
> On 12/23/2004 7:19 AM Beppe Alborè spake thus:
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> * actually, they say it's "a cream containing monobenzyl ether of
> hydroquinone (also called benoquin)"

I believe that Hydroquinone was used successfully in fighting malaria in
the past, and this is why it was common enough in the early days of
photography, when they were trying different compounds to see what could
be used as developing agents, it was found to work, and didn't stain the
hands, as some other chemicals do....

W
John - 28 Dec 2004 22:56 GMT
>I believe that Hydroquinone was used successfully in fighting malaria in
>the past, and this is why it was common enough in the early days of
>photography, ....

    Perhaps you were thinking of quinine ? Not that hydroquinone
and quinine aren't related. In fact quinine is a very complex compound
as shown in the following :

    "quinine bark chemicals include: aricine, caffeic acid,
cinchofulvic acid, cincholic acid, cinchonain, cinchonidine,
cinchonine, cinchophyllamine, cinchotannic acid, cinchotine,
conquinamine, cuscamidine, cuscamine, cusconidine, cusconine,
epicatechin, javanine, paricine, proanthocyanidins, quinacimine,
quinamine, quinic acid, quinicine, quinine, quininidine, quinovic
acid, quinovin, and sucirubine."

    It was used to treat numerous ailments though malaria was
certainly it's cheif usage.

Quinine - C20H24N2O2

The following from :

http://www.ibiblio.org/herbmed/eclectic/potter-comp/cinchona_alka.html

Thus, by the ring-arrangement of atoms peculiar to this series, there
are formed from Benzene, (C6H6), the following substances, viz.:—

Phenol, or Carbolic Acid, C6H5OH-by replacing H by OH, (hydroxyl).
Pyrocatechin, or Ortho-di-hydroxy-benzene, C6H4(OH)2—by replacing 2H
by 2OH.
Resorcin, or Meta-di-hydroxy-benzene, C6H4(OH)2—by replacing 2H by
2OH.
Hydroquinone, or Para-di-hydroxy-benzene C6H4(OH)2—by replacing 2H by
2OH.
Pyrogallol, Pyrogallic Acid, Tri-hydroxybenzene C6H3(OH)3,—3H by 3OH.
Amido-benzene, or Anilin, C6H5.NH2—by replacing H by NH2 (amidogen).
Nitro-benzene, C6H5.NO2—by replacing H by NO2 (nitroxyl).
Benzoic Acid, C6H5CO.OH—by replacing H by CO.OH (carboxyl).
Salicylic Acid, HC7H5O3—by replacing 2H by OH and CO.OH.
Naphtaline, C10H8—by uniting two Benzenes in an overlapping ring.
Pyridin, C5H5N—by replacing tetrad C by triad N.
Chinolin, C9H7N—uniting Benzene (C6H6) and Pyridin (C5H5N)

    Most interesting. I never cease to be amazed at the usage of
these chemicals.

Regards,

  John S. Douglas, Photographer -  http://www.puresilver.org
             Please remove the "_" when replying via email
David Nebenzahl - 29 Dec 2004 17:45 GMT
On 12/28/2004 2:56 PM John spake thus:

>> I believe that Hydroquinone was used successfully in fighting malaria in
>> the past, and this is why it was common enough in the early days of
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> quinamine, quinic acid, quinicine, quinine, quininidine, quinovic
> acid, quinovin, and sucirubine."

Plus, doesn't quinine figure in that most essential of social substances,
namely tonic water? Where would mixed drinks be without it?

Signature

 Today's bullshit job description:

 • Collaborate to produce operational procedures for the systems management
 of the production Information Technology infrastructure.

- from an actual job listing on Craigslist (http://www.craigslist.org)

Jordan W. - 29 Dec 2004 19:28 GMT
As in the description of quinine bark below, there is an actual
pure compound called quinine. You can buy it in pure form as the
sulfate salt. It is used as a standard in fluorescence spectroscopy
as well as an anti-malarial. It's pretty different from hydroquinone.

Actually, looking at that list of chemicals in quinine bark, there
are a few that would probably act as staining B&W developers. I
wonder if anyone's ever tried developing film in a gin/tonic mixture?

Didn't think so...

> On 12/28/2004 2:56 PM John spake thus:
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Plus, doesn't quinine figure in that most essential of social
> substances, namely tonic water? Where would mixed drinks be without it?
Richard Knoppow - 27 Dec 2004 10:32 GMT
I suggest Xtol for film and Agfa Neutol Plus for paper. Both are
Phenidone and Ascorbic acid developers with very low toxicity and good
environmental properties.
Xtol is sometimes subject to short term loss of activity. I've had
this happen recently. However, I don't know of another film developer
with only these ingredients. Most other Phenidone film developers also
contain hydroquinone. Hydroquinone is not particularly hazardous in a
photographic developer but has environmental problems.
In general, liquid concentrate developers are less hazardous than
powdered ones because they eliminate the danger of airborne particles.
There are a number of good liquid concentrate film developers on the
market, Kodak T-Max and T-Max RS being among them. Both use a form of
Phenidone and Hydroquinone.  Agfa Neutol Plus is a liquid concentrate.
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com
LR Kalajainen - 27 Dec 2004 12:37 GMT
Richard's correct about Xtol and Neutol.

A home-made version which also does not use Hydroquinone is
5 g sodium metaborate or 6 g sodium carbonate (depending on desired
level of activity)
4 g ascorbic acid (Vitamin C powder)
4 ml 1% Phenidone solution (1 g Phenidone dissolved in 100 ml either 90%
alcohol or propylene glycol)

Starting times at 22C. or 70F:
Delta 400 (with metaborate):  6 minutes
Delta 100 (with carbonate):  6:45  (with metaborate) 10 minutes
Fuji ACROS (with carbonate) 7  (with metaborate) 10 minutes
Fuji Neopan (with carbonate) 6:30

substituting borax in the above formula for the carbonate or metaborate
will give similar results but somewhat longer times.

Larry

>I suggest Xtol for film and Agfa Neutol Plus for paper. Both are
>Phenidone and Ascorbic acid developers with very low toxicity and good
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>Los Angeles, CA, USA
>dickburk@ix.netcom.com
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.