Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Shelf life of E6 chemicals

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
P. Meschter - 10 Dec 2004 22:52 GMT
I have some Kodak E6 that was opened in April and assume this will still be
serviceable.
However, I found a  6-bath Tetenal kit that I bought last year that I forgot
about and has not been opened. If sealed, what might I realistically expect
for a shelf life of the Tetenal? Would you use it?
Thanks,
Paul
uraniumcommittee@yahoo.com - 11 Dec 2004 00:24 GMT
"I have some Kodak E6 that was opened in April and assume this will
still be
serviceable."

What? What?

WHAT?
P. Meschter - 11 Dec 2004 00:59 GMT
Umm...yes. I bought a six bath Kodak E6 kit in April, mixed one batch for a
few 8x10 Fujichromes and haven't touched it since. The diluted chemicals
have been discarded but I assume that the undiluted chemicals are still
usable. Better?

> "I have some Kodak E6 that was opened in April and assume this will
> still be
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> WHAT?
uraniumcommittee@yahoo.com - 11 Dec 2004 01:38 GMT
No, opened chemistry of that age is dead.
Frank Pittel - 11 Dec 2004 02:21 GMT
: Umm...yes. I bought a six bath Kodak E6 kit in April, mixed one batch for a
: few 8x10 Fujichromes and haven't touched it since. The diluted chemicals
: have been discarded but I assume that the undiluted chemicals are still
: usable. Better?

The first thing you want to do is ignore  the troll. The second thing you want to do
is look on the box the chemistry came in and look at the expiration<SP?> date on the
box. I've done the same thing you did and after six months of sitting on a shelf I
had more E6 to develop and mixed up what I needed and it worked fine.

I also just dump a kit with half of it left because it past the expiration date.

Signature

Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------
fwp@deepthought.com

uraniumcommittee@yahoo.com - 11 Dec 2004 02:31 GMT
Ah, but he said this is OPENED chemistry, FP!
It is certainly deceased.
Some Dude - 11 Dec 2004 23:40 GMT
plonk.

You seriously need to find another newsgroup to disrupt.  

killfile for you.

>Ah, but he said this is OPENED chemistry, FP!
>It is certainly deceased.

Cheers,
-sd
http://www.zoom.sh
uraniumcommittee@yahoo.com - 12 Dec 2004 00:40 GMT
Opened E-6 chemistry from April? It's dead.
P. Meschter - 11 Dec 2004 14:04 GMT
Many thanks to all.
Paul

> : Umm...yes. I bought a six bath Kodak E6 kit in April, mixed one batch for a
> : few 8x10 Fujichromes and haven't touched it since. The diluted chemicals
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> I also just dump a kit with half of it left because it past the expiration date.
Claudio Bonavolta - 11 Dec 2004 01:17 GMT
> I have some Kodak E6 that was opened in April and assume this will still be
> serviceable.

If it wasn't mixed completely (I only mix what I need and keep the
concentrates), it may be fine.
First developer darkens with oxydation, it's a good indicator.
You may increase concentrates' life by filling the bottles with inert gaz.
With any chemical, if you have a doubt, don't develop important films with
it.

> However, I found a  6-bath Tetenal kit that I bought last year that I forgot
> about and has not been opened. If sealed, what might I realistically expect
> for a shelf life of the Tetenal? Would you use it?

It should be fine, but, again, try it first with non-important films.

> Thanks,
> Paul

Regards,
Claudio Bonavolta
http://www.bonavolta.ch
P. Meschter - 11 Dec 2004 23:17 GMT
Thank you all for your input. I tried the opened Kodak and it was fine.
Paul

> > I have some Kodak E6 that was opened in April and assume this will still
> be
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Claudio Bonavolta
> http://www.bonavolta.ch
David Nebenzahl - 12 Dec 2004 01:27 GMT
On 12/11/2004 3:17 PM P. Meschter spake thus:

> Thank you all for your input. I tried the opened Kodak and it was fine.
> Paul

Ha! Take that, U-235 (or is it U-238?). "Deceased". "Dead". "Useless".

HA! Your credibility is down another 85 points.

Signature

Don't blame Ralph Nader: blame Gavin Newsom.

uraniumcommittee@yahoo.com - 12 Dec 2004 04:06 GMT
Were the BOTTLES opened, or just the box? No way opened bottles would
still be usable after 9 months.

http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/support/techPubs/cis49/cis49.jhtml?i
d=0.1.14.34.9.16.26&lc=en


"Working Solutions and Oxidation--Once the original container is
opened, the chemicals are exposed to oxidation. Reaction of chemicals,
especially developers, with oxygen in the air will gradually cause them
to deteriorate. Oxidation continues to some extent even if the
container is immediately resealed. You can reduce oxidation by storing
working solutions in amounts that can be used all at one time. For
example, if you open a 10-gallon-size package, mix the entire amount,
and then store the solution in 1-gallon containers. Then, each time you
open a container you can use the entire amount, and the remaining mix
is not exposed to air."

http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml;jsessionid=XQJNZANRU5IUHFW4FBBHWD2W
1YUEK4L4?pq-path=528&mode=&query=E-6+chemistry+storage+opened&x=0&y=0&pq-locale=
en_US&_requestid=35902

Jim Phelps - 12 Dec 2004 13:37 GMT
Uhmm,  Yes they would.  Regardless of material posted by the 'objective'
chemical manufacturer (like telling everyone they go bad after 6 months is
not a way to increase sales or anything like that, no, they wouldn't do
that, would they?).

The world is not a lith toned picture.
Frank Pittel - 12 Dec 2004 19:01 GMT
: Uhmm,  Yes they would.  Regardless of material posted by the 'objective'
: chemical manufacturer (like telling everyone they go bad after 6 months is
: not a way to increase sales or anything like that, no, they wouldn't do
: that, would they?).

To be fair I think we can all agree that it's best not to open the bottles
until you actually need them. I figure that with the one shot kit being marketed
to the "home" user they would have to do something about the shelf life of the
concentrate chemistry. That would be the only way that they would be able to sell
the 5L kits.

Signature

Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------
fwp@deepthought.com

Jim Phelps - 12 Dec 2004 21:44 GMT
Frank,

  I buy larger kits all the time (Ilford P3 in 20 liter, Tetenal C-41 &
RA-4 & D-76 in 5 liter) and preserve the opened concentrates with Protectan
(butane cigarette lighter gas is the same stuff if you look at the MSDS).  I
also place them in brown glass bottles.  These measures keep the
concentrates for better than a year without discoloration or deterioration
(at least not detectable in the developed materials).  It just takes some
good preventative measures and you can keep partially emptied concentrates
for an extended time.  But, I know, the OP didn't say he had taken those
measures.  However, if I can keep them for 16 to 18 months with these
measures, they should last at least half that without.  Note:  none of what
I said related to partially used working solutions.  However, I have kept
RA-4 (working solutions) partially used for many months using the same
techniques.

  Too bad Tetenal killed the Tabs.  They were good kits with single (or
tailorable) amounts of chemistry for the volume at hand.  Always fresh and
one-shot.
Frank Pittel - 12 Dec 2004 22:28 GMT
: Frank,

:    I buy larger kits all the time (Ilford P3 in 20 liter, Tetenal C-41 &
: RA-4 & D-76 in 5 liter) and preserve the opened concentrates with Protectan
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
: RA-4 (working solutions) partially used for many months using the same
: techniques.

I also liked using Protectan until I couldn't get it anymore. Now I use cans
of compressed "air". Aside from the E6 one shot kit I use Tmax-rs which I get
by the gallon, Kodak's rapid fixer, and Tetenal's c41 press kit. I use all of
them in less time then their rated storage life.

:    Too bad Tetenal killed the Tabs.  They were good kits with single (or
: tailorable) amounts of chemistry for the volume at hand.  Always fresh and
: one-shot.

I don't ever remember being able to get the tablets here in the US. The 1 liter
press kit is a reasonable amount of chemistry to mix at once. For me that amounts
to between five and eight rolls of 35mm, 3-4 rolls of MF or as many as 24 sheets of
of 4x5. For me that's not hard to "save" before processing.

Signature

Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------
fwp@deepthought.com

Jim Phelps - 13 Dec 2004 06:38 GMT
> I don't ever remember being able to get the tablets here in the US. The 1
> liter
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> sheets of
> of 4x5. For me that's not hard to "save" before processing.

The Tabs and the 'Pearls' (RA-4) were available here in Europe for about 18
months.  I think Tetenal's biggest failure in marketing them was they stated
on the outside of the box (and in marketing literature) the kit was good for
12-36 exp. rolls.  However, in the instructions they showed doubling the
capacity with a 15 second time increase.  They cost the equivalent of $20
for the box and that made them expensive on a per roll basis (C-41) if you
used the 12 roll figure.  Cheaper if you used the 24 roll figure.  I never
did try the pearls (RA-4), as I find a greater economy in using the 5 liter
kits.  Plus I need a 2.5 liter volume for my processor (ACP-302).

I agree, for one-shot use the press kit is cheaper than taking them out for
processing.  Shouldn't you be able to get about 32-4X5's?

Jim
Frank Pittel - 13 Dec 2004 07:30 GMT
: > I don't ever remember being able to get the tablets here in the US. The 1
: > liter
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
: > sheets of
: > of 4x5. For me that's not hard to "save" before processing.

: The Tabs and the 'Pearls' (RA-4) were available here in Europe for about 18
: months.  I think Tetenal's biggest failure in marketing them was they stated
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
: did try the pearls (RA-4), as I find a greater economy in using the 5 liter
: kits.  Plus I need a 2.5 liter volume for my processor (ACP-302).

I heard that they were hard to dessolve. When the tabs were first released I
was looking forward to them being sold here in the US. In the end I settled
on the press kit for C41. The stuff is cheap and it mixes easily. I just wish
it didn't come in a powder.

: I agree, for one-shot use the press kit is cheaper than taking them out for
: processing.  Shouldn't you be able to get about 32-4X5's?

In theory I should be able to get 36 4x5s. However the Jobo tank I use holds
6 4x5 sheets of film and uses 270ml of chemistry. I shave off 20ml and take
advantage of the splashing of chemistry to give me even development. With only
the exception of stop and fixer I only use chemistry one shot.

Signature

Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------
fwp@deepthought.com

Jim Phelps - 13 Dec 2004 10:59 GMT
> I heard that they were hard to dessolve. When the tabs were first released
> I
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> wish
> it didn't come in a powder.

Moot point, but they dissolved pretty easy.  I'd throw them in the necessary
amount of demineralized water and drop them in the Jobo to warm up to temp.
By the time it got to 35 Celsius, they were dissolved and a quick stir was
all that was needed.  Too bad.  Really convenient.  I had made an offer to
ship anyone (at cost) who wanted to try a set and maybe get Jobo USA to
start importing.  No one took me up on the offer...  Good idea, lousy
marketing.
uraniumcommittee@yahoo.com - 12 Dec 2004 22:02 GMT
I suppose the chemicals might still 'work', but not anywhere near spec.
Jim Phelps - 14 Dec 2004 06:31 GMT
>I suppose the chemicals might still 'work', but not anywhere near spec.

Yesterday, I mixed up a batch of C-41 that was originally opened in October
2003.  According to color densitometer checks, there is no degradation or
measurable difference in a gray card when compared with film that was
processed when the chemistry was brand new (2cc yellow shift, but that's not
at all unusual).  Storage of the concentrates was in brown glass bottles in
a dark cabinet at room temp.  Air in the developer concentrate parts bottles
was displaced with Protectan gas.
uraniumcommittee@yahoo.com - 14 Dec 2004 15:14 GMT
That's a good product! Where can I get some Protectan gas?
Jim Phelps - 14 Dec 2004 17:07 GMT
> That's a good product! Where can I get some Protectan gas?

According to the MSDS (available from Tetenal's web site) it's a 90 - 100%
mixture of propane/butane gases.  The same stuff as gas lighter refill you
can buy at a local drug store.  All you need is a little squirt (about 1 to
2 seconds if a 1 liter bottle is 80% or better filled), so it'll last a
while.  I don't know if Protectan is available in the US any longer, if so,
mail order will slap a hazardous shipping charge on it as well.
uraniumcommittee@yahoo.com - 14 Dec 2004 17:15 GMT
Without such a product, though, color chemical 9 months old won't be
good.
Jim Phelps - 14 Dec 2004 19:46 GMT
> Without such a product, though, color chemical 9 months old won't be
> good.

Arguable.  It would depend upon many factors in the storage process.  To
include type of bottle, temp, heat/cooling cycling, exposed chemical surface
area are a few that come to mind.  The best way to determine is to test, and
the OP did just that to his favor.  To make a concrete stand based upon so
many unknowns is illogical (that last line in my best Spock voice:).
Frank Pittel - 14 Dec 2004 17:27 GMT
: > That's a good product! Where can I get some Protectan gas?

: According to the MSDS (available from Tetenal's web site) it's a 90 - 100%
: mixture of propane/butane gases.  The same stuff as gas lighter refill you
: can buy at a local drug store.  All you need is a little squirt (about 1 to
: 2 seconds if a 1 liter bottle is 80% or better filled), so it'll last a
: while.  I don't know if Protectan is available in the US any longer, if so,
: mail order will slap a hazardous shipping charge on it as well.

All the places I used to get it from stopped carrying it a long time
ago.

Signature

Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------
fwp@deepthought.com

Frank Pittel - 12 Dec 2004 19:35 GMT
I figured it would be. I would recommend that you mix what you need for your
immediate needs and not store mixed chemistry though.

: Thank you all for your input. I tried the opened Kodak and it was fine.
: Paul

: > > I have some Kodak E6 that was opened in April and assume this will still
: > be
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
: > Claudio Bonavolta
: > http://www.bonavolta.ch

Signature

Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------
fwp@deepthought.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.